137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34891874)
1. An Approach for Live Motion Correction for TRUS-MR Prostate Fusion Biopsy using Deep Learning.
Bhardwaj A; Mathur P; Singh T; Suryanarayana V; Son Y; Kudavelly SR; Song S; Kang H
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2021 Nov; 2021():2993-2996. PubMed ID: 34891874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Learning Non-rigid Deformations for Robust, Constrained Point-based Registration in Image-Guided MR-TRUS Prostate Intervention.
Onofrey JA; Staib LH; Sarkar S; Venkataraman R; Nawaf CB; Sprenkle PC; Papademetris X
Med Image Anal; 2017 Jul; 39():29-43. PubMed ID: 28431275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 2D-3D rigid registration to compensate for prostate motion during 3D TRUS-guided biopsy.
De Silva T; Fenster A; Cool DW; Gardi L; Romagnoli C; Samarabandu J; Ward AD
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):022904. PubMed ID: 23387775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Real-time registration of 3D to 2D ultrasound images for image-guided prostate biopsy.
Gillies DJ; Gardi L; De Silva T; Zhao SR; Fenster A
Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4708-4723. PubMed ID: 28666058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Non-rigid MR-TRUS image registration for image-guided prostate biopsy using correlation ratio-based mutual information.
Gong L; Wang H; Peng C; Dai Y; Ding M; Sun Y; Yang X; Zheng J
Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Jan; 16(1):8. PubMed ID: 28086888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Elastic Versus Rigid Image Registration in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Venderink W; de Rooij M; Sedelaar JPM; Huisman HJ; Fütterer JJ
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Mar; 4(2):219-227. PubMed ID: 28753777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Learning deep similarity metric for 3D MR-TRUS image registration.
Haskins G; Kruecker J; Kruger U; Xu S; Pinto PA; Wood BJ; Yan P
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2019 Mar; 14(3):417-425. PubMed ID: 30382457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of image registration accuracy in three-dimensional transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.
Karnik VV; Fenster A; Bax J; Cool DW; Gardi L; Gyacskov I; Romagnoli C; Ward AD
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):802-13. PubMed ID: 20229890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical modeling constrained surface-based image registration for prostate MR guided TRUS biopsy.
van de Ven WJ; Hu Y; Barentsz JO; Karssemeijer N; Barratt D; Huisman HJ
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2470-81. PubMed ID: 25979040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanically constrained non-rigid MR-TRUS prostate registration using deep learning based 3D point cloud matching.
Fu Y; Lei Y; Wang T; Patel P; Jani AB; Mao H; Curran WJ; Liu T; Yang X
Med Image Anal; 2021 Jan; 67():101845. PubMed ID: 33129147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Label-driven magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) registration using weakly supervised learning for MRI-guided prostate radiotherapy.
Zeng Q; Fu Y; Tian Z; Lei Y; Zhang Y; Wang T; Mao H; Liu T; Curran WJ; Jani AB; Patel P; Yang X
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Jun; 65(13):135002. PubMed ID: 32330922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automatic prostate segmentation using deep learning on clinically diverse 3D transrectal ultrasound images.
Orlando N; Gillies DJ; Gyacskov I; Romagnoli C; D'Souza D; Fenster A
Med Phys; 2020 Jun; 47(6):2413-2426. PubMed ID: 32166768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multiattribute probabilistic prostate elastic registration (MAPPER): application to fusion of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.
Sparks R; Bloch BN; Feleppa E; Barratt D; Moses D; Ponsky L; Madabhushi A
Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 42(3):1153-63. PubMed ID: 25735270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional nonrigid landmark-based magnetic resonance to transrectal ultrasound registration for image-guided prostate biopsy.
Sun Y; Qiu W; Yuan J; Romagnoli C; Fenster A
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2015 Apr; 2(2):025002. PubMed ID: 26158111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating the utility of intraprocedural 3D TRUS image information in guiding registration for displacement compensation during prostate biopsy.
De Silva T; Cool DW; Romagnoli C; Fenster A; Ward AD
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):082901. PubMed ID: 25086558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Technique for a hybrid system of real-time transrectal ultrasound with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in the guidance of targeted prostate biopsy.
Ukimura O; Hirahara N; Fujihara A; Yamada T; Iwata T; Kamoi K; Okihara K; Ito H; Nishimura T; Miki T
Int J Urol; 2010 Oct; 17(10):890-3. PubMed ID: 20812938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted, 3D transrectal ultrasound-guided fusion biopsy for prostate cancer: Quantifying the impact of needle delivery error on diagnosis.
Martin PR; Cool DW; Romagnoli C; Fenster A; Ward AD
Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):073504. PubMed ID: 24989418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of prostate tumor targeting strategies using magnetic resonance imaging-targeted, transrectal ultrasound-guided fusion biopsy.
Martin PR; Cool DW; Fenster A; Ward AD
Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 45(3):1018-1028. PubMed ID: 29363762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MR-targeted TRUS prostate biopsy using local reference augmentation: initial experience.
van de Ven WJ; Venderink W; Sedelaar JP; Veltman J; Barentsz JO; Fütterer JJ; Cornel EB; Huisman HJ
Int Urol Nephrol; 2016 Jul; 48(7):1037-45. PubMed ID: 27068817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Detection of prostate cancer by real-time MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy: 3T MRI and state of the art sonography].
Durmus T; Stephan C; Grigoryev M; Diederichs G; Saleh M; Slowinski T; Maxeiner A; Thomas A; Fischer T
Rofo; 2013 May; 185(5):428-33. PubMed ID: 23420313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
