These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34892268)

  • 1. An Adaptive, Affordable, Open-Source Robotic Hand for Deaf and Deaf-Blind Communication Using Tactile American Sign Language.
    Johnson S; Gao G; Johnson T; Liarokapis M; Bellini C
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2021 Nov; 2021():4732-4737. PubMed ID: 34892268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of an American Sign Language co-curricular training for pharmacy students.
    Bailey N; Kaarto P; Burkey J; Bright D; Sohn M
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2021 Jan; 13(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 33131621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tactile Enumeration and Embodied Numerosity Among the Deaf.
    Hochman S; Cohen ZZ; Ben-Shachar MS; Henik A
    Cogn Sci; 2020 Aug; 44(8):e12880. PubMed ID: 32761651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing Health Literacy in Deaf American Sign Language Users.
    McKee MM; Paasche-Orlow MK; Winters PC; Fiscella K; Zazove P; Sen A; Pearson T
    J Health Commun; 2015; 20 Suppl 2(0 2):92-100. PubMed ID: 26513036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptions of cardiovascular health in an underserved community of deaf adults using American Sign Language.
    McKee M; Schlehofer D; Cuculick J; Starr M; Smith S; Chin NP
    Disabil Health J; 2011 Jul; 4(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 21723526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Emergency Medical Services Communication Barriers and the Deaf American Sign Language User.
    Rotoli JM; Hancock S; Park C; Demers-Mcletchie S; Panko TL; Halle T; Wills J; Scarpino J; Merrill J; Cushman J; Jones C
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2022; 26(3):437-445. PubMed ID: 34060987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. "They're Not Willing To Accommodate Deaf patients": Communication Experiences of Deaf American Sign Language Users in the Emergency Department.
    James TG; Coady KA; Stacciarini JR; McKee MM; Phillips DG; Maruca D; Cheong J
    Qual Health Res; 2022 Jan; 32(1):48-63. PubMed ID: 34823402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deaf patient-provider communication and lung cancer screening: Health Information National Trends survey in American Sign Language (HINTS-ASL).
    Kushalnagar P; Engelman A; Sadler G
    Patient Educ Couns; 2018 Jul; 101(7):1232-1239. PubMed ID: 29548598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Classification Model Utilizing Facial Landmark Tracking to Determine Sentence Types for American Sign Language Recognition.
    Nguyen J; Wang YC
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2023 Jul; 2023():1-4. PubMed ID: 38083701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. American Sign Language Interpreters Perceptions of Barriers to Healthcare Communication in Deaf and Hard of Hearing Patients.
    Hommes RE; Borash AI; Hartwig K; DeGracia D
    J Community Health; 2018 Oct; 43(5):956-961. PubMed ID: 29696596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early visual language skills affect the trajectory of literacy gains over a three-year period of time for preschool aged deaf children who experience signing in the home.
    Allen TE; Morere DA
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0229591. PubMed ID: 32106252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Development of American Sign Language-Based Analogical Reasoning in Signing Deaf Children.
    Henner J; Novogrodsky R; Caldwell-Harris C; Hoffmeister R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Jan; 62(1):93-105. PubMed ID: 30521664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the need for a wearable sign language recognition device for deaf individuals: Results from a national questionnaire.
    Kudrinko K; Flavin E; Shepertycky M; Li Q
    Assist Technol; 2022 Nov; 34(6):684-697. PubMed ID: 33872548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Language codes and sense-making among deaf schoolchildren.
    Maxwell M; Doyle J
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 1996; 1(2):122-36. PubMed ID: 15579817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ask and ye shall not receive: Interpreter-related access barriers reported by Deaf users of American sign language.
    Schniedewind E; Lindsay R; Snow S
    Disabil Health J; 2020 Oct; 13(4):100932. PubMed ID: 32576507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using a social marketing framework to evaluate recruitment of a prospective study of genetic counseling and testing for the deaf community.
    Kobayashi Y; Boudreault P; Hill K; Sinsheimer JS; Palmer CG
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Nov; 13():145. PubMed ID: 24274380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breaking Down Communication Barriers: Assessing the Need for Audiologists to Have Access to Clinically Relevant Sign Language.
    Panning S; Lee RL; Misurelli SM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Apr; 32(4):261-267. PubMed ID: 34082464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cross-cultural communication with patients who use American Sign Language.
    Barnett S
    Fam Med; 2002 May; 34(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 12038720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Emergency Department utilization among Deaf American Sign Language users.
    McKee MM; Winters PC; Sen A; Zazove P; Fiscella K
    Disabil Health J; 2015 Oct; 8(4):573-8. PubMed ID: 26166160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of communication on preventive services among deaf American Sign Language users.
    McKee MM; Barnett SL; Block RC; Pearson TA
    Am J Prev Med; 2011 Jul; 41(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 21665066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.