These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34892304)

  • 1. Simultaneously varying back stiffness and trunk compression in a passive trunk exoskeleton during different activities: A pilot study.
    Gorsic M; Song Y; Johnson AP; Dai B; Novak D
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2021 Nov; 2021():4886-4890. PubMed ID: 34892304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Pilot Study of Varying Thoracic and Abdominal Compression in a Reconfigurable Trunk Exoskeleton During Different Activities.
    Gorsic M; Regmi Y; Johnson AP; Dai B; Novak D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2020 Jun; 67(6):1585-1594. PubMed ID: 31502962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Design and Pilot Evaluation of a Prototype Sensorized Trunk Exoskeleton.
    Hass D; Miller BA; Dai B; Novak D; Gorsic M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2021 Nov; 2021():4537-4541. PubMed ID: 34892226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Design and Pilot Evaluation of a Reconfigurable Spinal Exoskeleton.
    Johnson AP; Gorsic M; Regmi Y; Davidson BS; Dai B; Novak D
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():1731-1734. PubMed ID: 30440729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of a passive trunk exoskeleton on metabolic costs during lifting and walking.
    Baltrusch SJ; van Dieën JH; Bruijn SM; Koopman AS; van Bennekom CAM; Houdijk H
    Ergonomics; 2019 Jul; 62(7):903-916. PubMed ID: 30929608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the physiological benefits of a passive back-support exoskeleton during lifting and working in forward leaning postures.
    van Sluijs RM; Wehrli M; Brunner A; Lambercy O
    J Biomech; 2023 Mar; 149():111489. PubMed ID: 36806003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Toward real-world evaluations of trunk exoskeletons using inertial measurement units.
    Tran MH; Kmecl P; Regmi Y; Dai B; Gorsic M; Novak D
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2019 Jun; 2019():483-487. PubMed ID: 31374676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of a passive back exoskeleton on the mechanical loading of the low-back during symmetric lifting.
    Koopman AS; Kingma I; de Looze MP; van Dieën JH
    J Biomech; 2020 Mar; 102():109486. PubMed ID: 31718821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical evaluation of a new passive back support exoskeleton.
    Koopman AS; Näf M; Baltrusch SJ; Kingma I; Rodriguez-Guerrero C; Babič J; de Looze MP; van Dieën JH
    J Biomech; 2020 May; 105():109795. PubMed ID: 32423541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Passive Back-Support Exoskeleton for Manual Materials Handling: Reduction of Low Back Loading and Metabolic Effort during Repetitive Lifting.
    Schmalz T; Colienne A; Bywater E; Fritzsche L; Gärtner C; Bellmann M; Reimer S; Ernst M
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2022; 10(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 34763618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of a Passive Back Support Exoskeleton when Lifting and Carrying Lumber Boards.
    Novak VD; Song Y; Gorsic M; Dai B
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2023 Jul; 2023():1-4. PubMed ID: 38083667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of Soft versus Rigid Back-Support Exoskeletons during a Lifting Task.
    Schwartz M; Theurel J; Desbrosses K
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul; 18(15):. PubMed ID: 34360352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Model-Based Comparison of Passive and Active Assistance Designs in an Occupational Upper Limb Exoskeleton for Overhead Lifting.
    Zhou X; Zheng L
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2021; 9(3-4):167-185. PubMed ID: 34254566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of control strategies for an active back-support exoskeleton on spine loading and kinematics during lifting.
    Koopman AS; Toxiri S; Power V; Kingma I; van Dieën JH; Ortiz J; de Looze MP
    J Biomech; 2019 Jun; 91():14-22. PubMed ID: 31122661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical Consequences of Using Passive and Active Back-Support Exoskeletons during Different Manual Handling Tasks.
    Schwartz M; Desbrosses K; Theurel J; Mornieux G
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jul; 20(15):. PubMed ID: 37569010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Real-time lumbosacral joint loading estimation in exoskeleton-assisted lifting conditions via electromyography-driven musculoskeletal models.
    Moya-Esteban A; Durandau G; van der Kooij H; Sartori M
    J Biomech; 2023 Aug; 157():111727. PubMed ID: 37499430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Subjective Responses of Low Back Pain Patients and Asymptomatic Controls to Use of Spinal Exoskeleton during Simple Load Lifting Tasks: A Pilot Study.
    Kozinc Ž; Babič J; Šarabon N
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Dec; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 33379316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Kinematic effects of a passive lift assistive exoskeleton.
    Simon AA; Alemi MM; Asbeck AT
    J Biomech; 2021 May; 120():110317. PubMed ID: 33773297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling the metabolic reductions of a passive back-support exoskeleton.
    Alemi MM; Simon AA; Geissinger J; Asbeck AT
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2022 Mar; 132(3):737-760. PubMed ID: 35023764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Short-Term Effects of a Passive Spinal Exoskeleton on Functional Performance, Discomfort and User Satisfaction in Patients with Low Back Pain.
    Kozinc Ž; Baltrusch S; Houdijk H; Šarabon N
    J Occup Rehabil; 2021 Mar; 31(1):142-152. PubMed ID: 32356222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.