These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34892753)

  • 21. Unsupervised hidden semi-Markov model for automatic beat onset detection in 1D Doppler ultrasound.
    Katebi N; Marzbanrad F; Stroux L; Valderrama CE; Clifford GD
    Physiol Meas; 2020 Sep; 41(8):085007. PubMed ID: 32585651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The factor time in fetal heart rate monitoring and the detection of acidosis using the WAS score.
    Roemer VM; Walden R
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2014 Apr; 218(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 24788837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A novel LabVIEW-based multi-channel non-invasive abdominal maternal-fetal electrocardiogram signal generator.
    Martinek R; Kelnar M; Koudelka P; Vanus J; Bilik P; Janku P; Nazeran H; Zidek J
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Feb; 37(2):238-56. PubMed ID: 26799770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Separation and Analysis of Fetal-ECG Signals From Compressed Sensed Abdominal ECG Recordings.
    Da Poian G; Bernardini R; Rinaldo R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2016 Jun; 63(6):1269-79. PubMed ID: 26513775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Hidden Markov model in nonnegative matrix factorization for fetal heart rate estimation using physiological priors.
    Reséndiz Rojas M; Fontecave-Jallon J; Rivet B
    Physiol Meas; 2022 Oct; 43(10):. PubMed ID: 36113452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rapid detection of fetal compromise using input length invariant deep learning on fetal heart rate signals.
    Mendis L; Palaniswami M; Keenan E; Brownfoot F
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jun; 14(1):12615. PubMed ID: 38824217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Novel Framework for Motion-Tolerant Instantaneous Heart Rate Estimation by Phase-Domain Multiview Dynamic Time Warping.
    Zhang Q; Zhou D; Zeng X
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 64(11):2562-2574. PubMed ID: 28113198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An effective digitization method for CTG paper report with binary background grids taken by smartphone.
    Zhao Z; Liu Z; Si Y; Zhang Y; Ye H
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Mar; 200():105872. PubMed ID: 33288216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fetal QRS detection and heart rate estimation: a wavelet-based approach.
    Almeida R; Gonçalves H; Bernardes J; Rocha AP
    Physiol Meas; 2014 Aug; 35(8):1723-35. PubMed ID: 25070210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Design and Implementation of Cardiotocography Signals Classification Algorithm Based on Neural Network.
    Tang H; Wang T; Li M; Yang X
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2018; 2018():8568617. PubMed ID: 30627211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Misidentification of maternal heart rate as fetal on cardiotocography during the second stage of labor: the role of the fetal electrocardiograph.
    Nurani R; Chandraharan E; Lowe V; Ugwumadu A; Arulkumaran S
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Dec; 91(12):1428-32. PubMed ID: 22881463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Quantitative Cardiotocography--what does it look like and what can we expect].
    Roemer VM; Walden R
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2006 Jun; 210(3):77-91. PubMed ID: 16794985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Use of Deep Learning to Detect the Maternal Heart Rate and False Signals on Fetal Heart Rate Recordings.
    Boudet S; Houzé de l'Aulnoit A; Peyrodie L; Demailly R; Houzé de l'Aulnoit D
    Biosensors (Basel); 2022 Aug; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 36140076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. QRS classification and spatial combination for robust heart rate detection in low-quality fetal ECG recordings.
    Warmerdam G; Vullings R; Van Pul C; Andriessen P; Oei SG; Wijn P
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():2004-7. PubMed ID: 24110110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Extraction of foetal ECG from abdominal ECG by nonlinear transformation and estimations.
    John RG; Ramachandran KI
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Jul; 175():193-204. PubMed ID: 31104707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparative study of a new cardiotocography analysis program.
    Chen CY; Chen JC; Yu C; Lin CW
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():2567-70. PubMed ID: 19965213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fetal heart rate estimation from a single phonocardiogram signal using non-negative matrix factorization.
    Dia N; Fontecave-Jallon J; Gumery PY; Rivet B
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():5983-5986. PubMed ID: 31947210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Difference of fetal heart rate accelerations based on 10 and 15 beats per minute.
    Park YS; Koh SK; Hoh JK; Park MI
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2010 Apr; 36(2):291-5. PubMed ID: 20492379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [CTG: microfluctuation].
    Roemer VM
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2004 Dec; 208(6):210-9. PubMed ID: 15647984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accuracy, Clinical Utility, and Usability of a Wireless Self-Guided Fetal Heart Rate Monitor.
    Porter P; Muirhead F; Brisbane J; Schneider B; Choveaux J; Bear N; Carson J; Jones K; Silva D; Neppe C
    Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 137(4):673-681. PubMed ID: 33706351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.