These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34892971)

  • 1. Myth of the molecule: DNA barcodes for species cannot replace morphology for identification and classification.
    Will KW; Rubinoff D
    Cladistics; 2004 Feb; 20(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 34892971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sorting specimen-rich invertebrate samples with cost-effective NGS barcodes: Validating a reverse workflow for specimen processing.
    Wang WY; Srivathsan A; Foo M; Yamane SK; Meier R
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 May; 18(3):490-501. PubMed ID: 29314756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A genomic perspective on the shortcomings of mitochondrial DNA for "barcoding" identification.
    Rubinoff D; Cameron S; Will K
    J Hered; 2006; 97(6):581-94. PubMed ID: 17135463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing DNA Barcodes for Species Identification in North American Reptiles and Amphibians in Natural History Collections.
    Chambers EA; Hebert PD
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0154363. PubMed ID: 27116180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The multiple applications of DNA barcodes in avian evolutionary studies.
    Barreira AS; Lijtmaer DA; Tubaro PL
    Genome; 2016 Nov; 59(11):899-911. PubMed ID: 27824508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Utility of mitochondrial DNA barcodes in species conservation.
    Rubinoff D
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Aug; 20(4):1026-33. PubMed ID: 16922219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. DNA barcoding and species delimitation of butterflies (Lepidoptera) from Nigeria.
    Nneji LM; Adeola AC; Ayoola AO; Oladipo SO; Wang YY; Malann YD; Anyaele O; Nneji IC; Rahman MM; Olory CS
    Mol Biol Rep; 2020 Dec; 47(12):9441-9457. PubMed ID: 33200313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Updating Biodiversity Studies in Loricate Protists: The Case of the Tintinnids (Alveolata, Ciliophora, Spirotrichea).
    Santoferrara LF; Bachy C; Alder VA; Gong J; Kim YO; Saccà A; da Silva Neto ID; Strüder-Kypke MC; Warren A; Xu D; Yi Z; Agatha S
    J Eukaryot Microbiol; 2016 Sep; 63(5):651-6. PubMed ID: 26863912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Land plants and DNA barcodes: short-term and long-term goals.
    Chase MW; Salamin N; Wilkinson M; Dunwell JM; Kesanakurthi RP; Haider N; Savolainen V
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2005 Oct; 360(1462):1889-95. PubMed ID: 16214746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Research progress on DNA barcoding analysis methods].
    Yang QQ; Liu SW; Yu XP
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2018 Mar; 29(3):1006-1014. PubMed ID: 29722246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benchmarking DNA barcodes: An assessment using available primate sequences.
    Hajibabaei M; Singer GA; Hickey DA
    Genome; 2006 Jul; 49(7):851-4. PubMed ID: 16936793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. DNA barcodes and citizen science provoke a diversity reappraisal for the "ring" butterflies of Peninsular Malaysia (Ypthima: Satyrinae: Nymphalidae: Lepidoptera).
    Jisming-See SW; Sing KW; Wilson JJ
    Genome; 2016 Oct; 59(10):879-888. PubMed ID: 27333330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of DNA barcodes in understanding and conservation of mammal diversity in southeast Asia.
    Francis CM; Borisenko AV; Ivanova NV; Eger JL; Lim BK; Guillén-Servent A; Kruskop SV; Mackie I; Hebert PD
    PLoS One; 2010 Sep; 5(9):e12575. PubMed ID: 20838635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Longer is Not Always Better: Optimizing Barcode Length for Large-Scale Species Discovery and Identification.
    Yeo D; Srivathsan A; Meier R
    Syst Biol; 2020 Sep; 69(5):999-1015. PubMed ID: 32065638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrative taxonomy detects cryptic and overlooked fish species in a neotropical river basin.
    Gomes LC; Pessali TC; Sales NG; Pompeu PS; Carvalho DC
    Genetica; 2015 Oct; 143(5):581-8. PubMed ID: 26142058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reverse taxonomy for elucidating diversity of insect-associated nematodes: a case study with termites.
    Kanzaki N; Giblin-Davis RM; Scheffrahn RH; Taki H; Esquivel A; Davies KA; Herre EA
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e43865. PubMed ID: 22952792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. DNA barcoding of Rhododendron (Ericaceae), the largest Chinese plant genus in biodiversity hotspots of the Himalaya-Hengduan Mountains.
    Yan LJ; Liu J; Möller M; Zhang L; Zhang XM; Li DZ; Gao LM
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2015 Jul; 15(4):932-44. PubMed ID: 25469426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Re-integrating earthworm juveniles into soil biodiversity studies: species identification through DNA barcoding.
    Richard B; Decaëns T; Rougerie R; James SW; Porco D; Hebert PD
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2010 Jul; 10(4):606-14. PubMed ID: 21565065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Divergent domains of 28S ribosomal RNA gene: DNA barcodes for molecular classification and identification of mites.
    Zhao Y; Zhang WY; Wang RL; Niu DL
    Parasit Vectors; 2020 May; 13(1):251. PubMed ID: 32404192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Chromosomal identification of cryptic species sharing their DNA barcodes:
    Lukhtanov VA; Shapoval NA
    Comp Cytogenet; 2017; 11(4):759-768. PubMed ID: 29302296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.