These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34892987)

  • 1. High bladder pressure reduces the ability to filter out interference from distractors in low perceptual load condition.
    Gunduz H; Gunduz T; Ozkan Ceylan A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Dec; 75(12):2219-2231. PubMed ID: 34892987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Low cognitive load strengthens distractor interference while high load attenuates when cognitive load and distractor possess similar visual characteristics.
    Minamoto T; Shipstead Z; Osaka N; Engle RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1659-73. PubMed ID: 25813738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control.
    Lavie N; Hirst A; de Fockert JW; Viding E
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Sep; 133(3):339-54. PubMed ID: 15355143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Opposing effects of perceptual versus working memory load on emotional distraction.
    Tavares TP; Logie K; Mitchell DG
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 234(10):2945-56. PubMed ID: 27329606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of acute stress and perceptual load on distractor interference.
    Sato H; Takenaka I; Kawahara JI
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):617-23. PubMed ID: 22463388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of working memory contents and perceptual load on distractor processing: When a response-related distractor is held in working memory.
    Koshino H
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jan; 172():19-25. PubMed ID: 27838400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interactions Between Modality of Working Memory Load and Perceptual Load in Distractor Processing.
    Koshino H; Olid P
    J Gen Psychol; 2015; 142(3):135-49. PubMed ID: 26273937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interference from familiar natural distractors is not eliminated by high perceptual load.
    He C; Chen A
    Psychol Res; 2010 May; 74(3):268-76. PubMed ID: 19652997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Threat distractor and perceptual load modulate test-retest reliability of anterior cingulate cortex response.
    Bunford N; Kinney KL; Michael J; Klumpp H
    Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 2017 Jul; 77():120-127. PubMed ID: 28408292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The spatial focus of attention is controlled at perceptual and cognitive levels.
    Caparos S; Linnell KJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1080-107. PubMed ID: 20873935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Concurrent working memory load can facilitate selective attention: evidence for specialized load.
    Park S; Kim MS; Chun MM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Oct; 33(5):1062-75. PubMed ID: 17924807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Working memory load and distraction: dissociable effects of visual maintenance and cognitive control.
    Konstantinou N; Beal E; King JR; Lavie N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Oct; 76(7):1985-97. PubMed ID: 25085738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Processing overlap-dependent distractor dilution rather than perceptual target load determines attentional selectivity.
    Tan J; Yin S; Wang L; Chen A; Egner T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Nov; 80(8):2048-2059. PubMed ID: 29968079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attentional sets influence perceptual load effects, but not dilution effects.
    Benoni H; Zivony A; Tsal Y
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):785-92. PubMed ID: 24131273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of working memory in auditory selective attention.
    Dalton P; Santangelo V; Spence C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Nov; 62(11):2126-32. PubMed ID: 19557667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selective attention supports working memory maintenance by modulating perceptual processing of distractors.
    Sreenivasan KK; Jha AP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17214561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Foraging through multiple target categories reveals the flexibility of visual working memory.
    Kristjánsson T; Kristjánsson Á
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():108-115. PubMed ID: 29275949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selective target processing: perceptual load or distractor salience?
    Eltiti S; Wallace D; Fox E
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Jul; 67(5):876-85. PubMed ID: 16334059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Opposite effects of capacity load and resolution load on distractor processing.
    Zhang W; Luck SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 25365573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Harnessing the wandering mind: the role of perceptual load.
    Forster S; Lavie N
    Cognition; 2009 Jun; 111(3):345-55. PubMed ID: 19327760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.