172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34894032)
1. Intraoral Digital Scans for Fabricating Tooth-Supported Prostheses Using a Custom Intraoral Scan Body.
Gómez-Polo M; Revilla-León M; Limones Á; Cascos R; Gómez-Polo C; Ortega R
J Prosthodont; 2022 Apr; 31(4):356-361. PubMed ID: 34894032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A guide for selecting the intraoral scan extension when fabricating tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.
Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M; Kois JC
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Jan; 36(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 37789708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Virtual implant scan body switch by using computer-aided design programs avoiding the need of obtaining a new intraoral implant digital scan: A novel protocol.
Alonso Pérez-Barquero J; García-Sala Bonmatí F; de Fernández Estevan L; Guinot Barona C; Maneiro Lojo J; Revilla-León M
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Feb; 36(2):278-283. PubMed ID: 37681471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Feasibility of using an intraoral scanner for a complete-arch digital scan.
Park GH; Son K; Lee KB
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 May; 121(5):803-810. PubMed ID: 30598314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of abutment tooth geometry on the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining dental impressions.
Carbajal Mejía JB; Wakabayashi K; Nakamura T; Yatani H
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):392-399. PubMed ID: 28222873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner.
Flügge TV; Schlager S; Nelson K; Nahles S; Metzger MC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Sep; 144(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 23992820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An additively manufactured intraoral scan body for aiding complete-arch intraoral implant digital scans with guided integration of 3D virtual representation.
Pérez-Giugovaz MG; Mosier M; Revilla-León M
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jan; 127(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 33413985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of a chairside intraoral scanner compared with a laboratory scanner for the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis.
Zarone F; Ruggiero G; Ferrari M; Mangano F; Joda T; Sorrentino R
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):761.e1-761.e7. PubMed ID: 33289647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Additively manufactured devices with varying designs and sizes for acquiring initial intraoral implant scans.
Guirao S; Llansana F; Button H; Yilmaz B; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(S2):181-185. PubMed ID: 37585338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues.
Gan N; Xiong Y; Jiao T
PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158800. PubMed ID: 27383409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of digital auricular impression using intraoral scanner versus conventional impression technique for ear rehabilitation: A controlled clinical trial.
Dohiem MM; Emam NS; Abdallah MF; Abdelaziz MS
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Nov; 75(11):4254-4263. PubMed ID: 36117136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A guide for maximizing the accuracy of intraoral digital scans: Part 2-Patient factors.
Revilla-León M; Kois DE; Kois JC
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Jan; 35(1):241-249. PubMed ID: 36639916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of data obtained from impression scans and cast scans using different impression materials.
Keul C; Runkel C; Güth JF; Schubert O
Int J Comput Dent; 2020; 23(2):129-138. PubMed ID: 32555766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving digital scans by using a peripheral custom tray: A dental technique.
Virard F; Millet C; Bienfait A; Ducret M
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Aug; 126(2):173-177. PubMed ID: 32800578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Merging intraoral scans and CBCT: a novel technique for improving the accuracy of 3D digital models for implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses.
Gómez-Polo M; Ballesteros J; Padilla PP; Pulido PP; Revilla-León M; Ortega R
Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Jun; 24(2):117-123. PubMed ID: 34085497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine.
Revilla-León M; Att W; Özcan M; Rubenstein J
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):470-478. PubMed ID: 32386912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of scan body design on accuracy of the implant position as transferred to a virtual definitive implant cast.
Revilla-León M; Smith Z; Methani MM; Zandinejad A; Özcan M
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):918-923. PubMed ID: 32493568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy and reproducibility of virtual edentulous casts created by laboratory impression scan protocols.
Peng L; Chen L; Harris BT; Bhandari B; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):389-395. PubMed ID: 29703675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A technical and clinical digital approach to the altered cast technique with an intraoral scanner and polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
Cameron AB; Evans JL; Robb ND
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 35850875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
