BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34895114)

  • 1. Comparing the topology of phylogenetic network generators.
    Janssen R; Liu P
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2021 Dec; 19(6):2140012. PubMed ID: 34895114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. PhyloNet: a software package for analyzing and reconstructing reticulate evolutionary relationships.
    Than C; Ruths D; Nakhleh L
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Jul; 9():322. PubMed ID: 18662388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computing the Bounds of the Number of Reticulations in a Tree-Child Network That Displays a Set of Trees.
    Wu Y; Zhang L
    J Comput Biol; 2024 Apr; 31(4):345-359. PubMed ID: 38285528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Classes of explicit phylogenetic networks and their biological and mathematical significance.
    Kong S; Pons JC; Kubatko L; Wicke K
    J Math Biol; 2022 May; 84(6):47. PubMed ID: 35503141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Generation of Level- k LGT Networks.
    Pons JC; Scornavacca C; Cardona G
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2020; 17(1):158-164. PubMed ID: 30703035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bayesian Inference of Reticulate Phylogenies under the Multispecies Network Coalescent.
    Wen D; Yu Y; Nakhleh L
    PLoS Genet; 2016 May; 12(5):e1006006. PubMed ID: 27144273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spaces of phylogenetic networks from generalized nearest-neighbor interchange operations.
    Huber KT; Linz S; Moulton V; Wu T
    J Math Biol; 2016 Feb; 72(3):699-725. PubMed ID: 26037483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inferring explicit weighted consensus networks to represent alternative evolutionary histories.
    Layeghifard M; Peres-Neto PR; Makarenkov V
    BMC Evol Biol; 2013 Dec; 13():274. PubMed ID: 24359207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Applicability of several rooted phylogenetic network algorithms for representing the evolutionary history of SARS-CoV-2.
    Wallin R; van Iersel L; Kelk S; Stougie L
    BMC Ecol Evol; 2021 Dec; 21(1):220. PubMed ID: 34876022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phylogenetic Comparative Methods on Phylogenetic Networks with Reticulations.
    Bastide P; Solís-Lemus C; Kriebel R; William Sparks K; Ané C
    Syst Biol; 2018 Sep; 67(5):800-820. PubMed ID: 29701821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Space of Tree-Based Phylogenetic Networks.
    Fischer M; Francis A
    Bull Math Biol; 2020 Jun; 82(6):70. PubMed ID: 32500263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Binets: Fundamental Building Blocks for Phylogenetic Networks.
    van Iersel L; Moulton V; de Swart E; Wu T
    Bull Math Biol; 2017 May; 79(5):1135-1154. PubMed ID: 28386669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. TriLoNet: Piecing Together Small Networks to Reconstruct Reticulate Evolutionary Histories.
    Oldman J; Wu T; van Iersel L; Moulton V
    Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Aug; 33(8):2151-62. PubMed ID: 27189565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do Branch Lengths Help to Locate a Tree in a Phylogenetic Network?
    Gambette P; van Iersel L; Kelk S; Pardi F; Scornavacca C
    Bull Math Biol; 2016 Sep; 78(9):1773-1795. PubMed ID: 27659024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Uniqueness, intractability and exact algorithms: reflections on level-k phylogenetic networks.
    Van Iersel L; Kelk S; Mnich M
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2009 Aug; 7(4):597-623. PubMed ID: 19634194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Forest-Based Networks.
    Huber KT; Moulton V; Scholz GE
    Bull Math Biol; 2022 Sep; 84(10):119. PubMed ID: 36107279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies.
    Huson DH; Bryant D
    Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Feb; 23(2):254-67. PubMed ID: 16221896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phylogenetic networks do not need to be complex: using fewer reticulations to represent conflicting clusters.
    van Iersel L; Kelk S; Rupp R; Huson D
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Jun; 26(12):i124-31. PubMed ID: 20529896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Choice of topology estimators in Bayesian phylogenetic analysis.
    Sukumaran J; Linkem CW
    Mol Biol Evol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 18984901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characterization of reticulate networks based on the coalescent with recombination.
    Arenas M; Valiente G; Posada D
    Mol Biol Evol; 2008 Dec; 25(12):2517-20. PubMed ID: 18927089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.