These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34896442)
1. Comparative evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive in class II bulk-fill restorations: A 48-month randomized controlled trial. Yazici AR; Uslu Tekce A; Kutuk ZB J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103921. PubMed ID: 34896442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Thirty-six-month clinical evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive. Atalay C; Ozgunaltay G; Yazici AR Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Apr; 24(4):1569-1578. PubMed ID: 31468262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Thirty-six-month follow-up of cervical composite restorations placed with an MDP-free universal adhesive system using different adhesive protocols: a randomized clinical trial. Barceleiro MO; Lopes LS; Tardem C; Calazans FS; Matos TP; Reis A; Calixto AL; Loguercio AD Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jun; 26(6):4337-4350. PubMed ID: 35142923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of dentin roughness on the adhesive performance in non-carious cervical lesions: A double-blind randomized clinical trial. Loguercio AD; Luque-Martinez IV; Fuentes S; Reis A; Muñoz MA J Dent; 2018 Feb; 69():60-69. PubMed ID: 28962842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical performance of posterior restorations using a universal adhesive over moist and dry dentin: A 36-month double-blind split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Ñaupari-Villasante R; Falconi-Páez C; Castro AS; Gutiérrez MF; Mendez-Bauer ML; Aliaga P; Dávila-Sánchez A; Arrais C; Reis A; Loguercio AD J Dent; 2024 Aug; 147():105080. PubMed ID: 38788919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Twenty-four-month clinical performance of different universal adhesives in etch-and-rinse, selective etching and self-etch application modes in NCCL - a randomized controlled clinical trial. Oz FD; Ergin E; Canatan S J Appl Oral Sci; 2019; 27():e20180358. PubMed ID: 30994773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Postoperative sensitivity in posterior resin composite restorations with prior application of a glutaraldehyde-based desensitizing solution: A randomized clinical trial. de Oliveira ILM; Hanzen TA; de Paula AM; Perdigão J; Montes MAJR; Loguercio AD; Monteiro GQM J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103918. PubMed ID: 34879245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 24-Month Clinical Evaluation of Different Bulk-Fill Restorative Resins in Class II Restorations. Guney T; Yazici AR Oper Dent; 2020; 45(2):123-133. PubMed ID: 31693438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Thirty-Six-Month Clinical Comparison of Bulk Fill and Nanofill Composite Restorations. Yazici AR; Antonson SA; Kutuk ZB; Ergin E Oper Dent; 2017; 42(5):478-485. PubMed ID: 28581919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of Dentin Moisture in Posterior Restorations Performed with Universal Adhesive: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Castro AS; Maran BM; Gutierrez MF; Chemin K; Mendez-Bauer ML; Bermúdez JP; Reis A; Loguercio AD Oper Dent; 2022 Mar; 47(2):E91-E105. PubMed ID: 35405005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomized clinical split-mouth study on a novel self-adhesive bulk-fill restorative vs. a conventional bulk-fill composite for restoration of class II cavities - results after three years. Cieplik F; Hiller KA; Buchalla W; Federlin M; Scholz KJ J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104275. PubMed ID: 36044948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical evaluation of posterior restorations over wet and dry dentin using an etch-and-rinse adhesive: A 36-month randomized clinical trial. González CC; Ñaupari-Villasante R; Dos Santos de Castro A; Mendez-Bauer L; Dávila-Sanchez A; Aliaga-Sancho P; Gutierrez MF; Reis A; Loguercio AD Dent Mater; 2024 Apr; 40(4):619-628. PubMed ID: 38369403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A New Dual-cure Universal Simplified Adhesive: 18-month Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial. de Albuquerque EG; Warol F; Calazans FS; Poubel LA; Marins SS; Matos T; de Souza JJ; Reis A; de Oliveira Barceleiro M; Loguercio AD Oper Dent; 2020 Sep; 45(5):E255-E270. PubMed ID: 33170938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Universal Simplified Adhesive applied under different bonding technique's: 36-month Randomized Multicentre Clinical Trial. de Albuquerque EG; Warol F; Tardem C; Calazans FS; Poubel LA; Matos TP; Souza JJ; Reis A; Barceleiro MO; Loguercio AD J Dent; 2022 Jul; 122():104120. PubMed ID: 35398450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Follow-up of flowable resin composites performed with a universal adhesive system in non-carious cervical lesions: A randomized, controlled 24-month clinical trial. Kemaloğlu H; Atalayin Ozkaya C; Ergucu Z; Onal B Am J Dent; 2020 Feb; 33(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 32056414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass ionomer in Class II cavities: one-year results. Balkaya H; Arslan S; Pala K J Appl Oral Sci; 2019; 27():e20180678. PubMed ID: 31596369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]