139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34898927)
1. Revision total hip arthroplasty is associated with poorer clinically meaningful improvements and patient satisfaction compared to primary total hip arthroplasty.
Zhang S; Chen JY; Pang HN; Lo NN; Yeo SJ; Liow MHL
J Orthop; 2021; 28():96-100. PubMed ID: 34898927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Demonstrate Less Improvement and Significantly Higher Rates of Worsening Compared to Primaries.
Salimy MS; Paschalidis A; Dunahoe JA; ; Bedair HS; Melnic CM
J Arthroplasty; 2023 Nov; 38(11):2410-2414. PubMed ID: 37271232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Are Oxford Hip Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Useful Predictors of Clinical Meaningful Improvement and Satisfaction After Total Hip Arthroplasty?
Yeo MGH; Goh GS; Chen JY; Lo NN; Yeo SJ; Liow MHL
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Sep; 35(9):2458-2464. PubMed ID: 32416955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Between Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Realistic Patient Expectations for Patients With Low Baseline Activity.
Dubin J; Westrich G
Orthopedics; 2022; 45(4):251-255. PubMed ID: 35245136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preoperative mental distress is associated with poorer physical improvements after revision total hip arthroplasty.
Zhang S; Tay DKJ; Pang HN; Lo NN; Yeo SJ; Liow MHL
J Orthop; 2023 Jan; 35():18-23. PubMed ID: 36345326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does obesity lead to lower rates of clinically meaningful improvement or satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty? A propensity score-matched study.
Goh GS; Zeng GJ; Tay DK; Lo NN; Yeo SJ; Liow MHL
Hip Int; 2022 Sep; 32(5):610-619. PubMed ID: 33226866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Machine learning algorithms do not outperform preoperative thresholds in predicting clinically meaningful improvements after total knee arthroplasty.
Zhang S; Lau BPH; Ng YH; Wang X; Chua W
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2022 Aug; 30(8):2624-2630. PubMed ID: 34245310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does the Primary Surgical Approach Matter When Choosing the Approach for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty?
Christensen TH; Humphrey TJ; Salimy MS; Roundy RS; Goel RK; Guild GN; Schwarzkopf R; Bedair HS; Aggarwal VK
J Arthroplasty; 2024 Jan; 39(1):211-217. PubMed ID: 37393962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimum 5-Year Outcomes of Robotic-assisted Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Nested Comparison Against Manual Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.
Domb BG; Chen JW; Lall AC; Perets I; Maldonado DR
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2020 Oct; 28(20):847-856. PubMed ID: 32109923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing Methods to Determine the Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Veterans Undergoing Elective Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty in Veterans Health Administration Hospitals.
Kuo AC; Giori NJ; Bowe TR; Manfredi L; Lalani NF; Nordin DA; Harris AHS
JAMA Surg; 2020 May; 155(5):404-411. PubMed ID: 32211842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Return to activity following revision total hip arthroplasty.
Turnbull GS; Scott CEH; MacDonald DJ; Breusch SJ
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2019 Mar; 139(3):411-421. PubMed ID: 30535720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic arm-assisted versus manual total hip arthroplasty.
Clement ND; Gaston P; Bell A; Simpson P; Macpherson G; Hamilton DF; Patton JT
Bone Joint Res; 2021 Jan; 10(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 33380216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement With Capsular Management: Factors Associated With Achieving Clinically Significant Outcomes.
Cvetanovich GL; Weber AE; Kuhns BD; Alter J; Harris JD; Mather RC; Nho SJ
Am J Sports Med; 2018 Feb; 46(2):288-296. PubMed ID: 29161115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient-reported Outcome Measures of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Prosthetic Joint Infection is not Inferior to Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Lim J; Pang HN; Tay K; Chia SL; Yeo SJ; Lo NN
Malays Orthop J; 2020 Nov; 14(3):73-81. PubMed ID: 33403065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The oxford knee score minimal clinically important difference for revision total knee arthroplasty.
Khow YZ; Liow MHL; Goh GS; Chen JY; Lo NN; Yeo SJ
Knee; 2021 Oct; 32():211-217. PubMed ID: 34509827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Effect of Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty on Gait Kinematics].
Janura M; ZahutovÁ E; Gallo J; Svoboda Z; HonzÍkovÁ L
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2020; 87(4):243-250. PubMed ID: 32940219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Weighted Scoring System Based on Preoperative and Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Guide Timing of Knee Arthroplasty.
Khow YZ; Liow MHL; Yeoh ZGF; Chen JY; Lo NN; Yeo SJ
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Dec; 36(12):3894-3900. PubMed ID: 34454804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient-reported outcome measures, complication rates, and re-revision rates are not associated with the indication for revision total hip arthroplasty : a prospective evaluation of 647 consecutive patients.
Innocenti M; Smulders K; Willems JH; Goosen JHM; van Hellemondt G
Bone Joint J; 2022 Jul; 104-B(7):859-866. PubMed ID: 35775171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. John Charnley Award: Preoperative Patient-reported Outcome Measures Predict Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Function After THA.
Berliner JL; Brodke DJ; Chan V; SooHoo NF; Bozic KJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):321-9. PubMed ID: 26201420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimum 5-Year Outcomes for Revision Hip Arthroscopy With a Prospective Subanalysis Against a Propensity-Matched Control Primary Group.
Maldonado DR; Kyin C; Rosinsky PJ; Shapira J; Diulus SC; Lall AC; Domb BG
Am J Sports Med; 2021 Jul; 49(8):2090-2101. PubMed ID: 33999725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
