These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34900932)

  • 1. The GW/BSE Method in Magnetic Fields.
    Holzer C; Pausch A; Klopper W
    Front Chem; 2021; 9():746162. PubMed ID: 34900932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optical Gaps of Ionic Materials from GW/BSE-in-DFT and CC2-in-DFT.
    Sharma M; Sierka M
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2024 Nov; 20(21):9592-9605. PubMed ID: 39417709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. All-Electron BSE@
    Yao Y; Golze D; Rinke P; Blum V; Kanai Y
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Mar; 18(3):1569-1583. PubMed ID: 35138865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Benchmarking the GW Approximation and Bethe-Salpeter Equation for Groups IB and IIB Atoms and Monoxides.
    Hung L; Bruneval F; Baishya K; Öğüt S
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 May; 13(5):2135-2146. PubMed ID: 28387124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Communication: A hybrid Bethe-Salpeter/time-dependent density-functional-theory approach for excitation energies.
    Holzer C; Klopper W
    J Chem Phys; 2018 Sep; 149(10):101101. PubMed ID: 30219024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening mixing GW/Bethe-Salpeter approach for triplet states of organic molecules.
    Ziaei V; Bredow T
    J Phys Condens Matter; 2018 Oct; 30(39):395501. PubMed ID: 30124435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy Assessment of GW Starting Points for Calculating Molecular Excitation Energies Using the Bethe-Salpeter Formalism.
    Gui X; Holzer C; Klopper W
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Apr; 14(4):2127-2136. PubMed ID: 29499116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Excitation Energies from the Single-Particle Green's Function with the GW Approximation.
    Jin Y; Yang W
    J Phys Chem A; 2019 Apr; 123(14):3199-3204. PubMed ID: 30920830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implementation of the Bethe-Salpeter equation in the TURBOMOLE program.
    Krause K; Klopper W
    J Comput Chem; 2017 Mar; 38(6):383-388. PubMed ID: 27925312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combining Renormalized Singles
    Li J; Golze D; Yang W
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Nov; 18(11):6637-6645. PubMed ID: 36279250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pros and Cons of the Bethe-Salpeter Formalism for Ground-State Energies.
    Loos PF; Scemama A; Duchemin I; Jacquemin D; Blase X
    J Phys Chem Lett; 2020 May; 11(9):3536-3545. PubMed ID: 32298578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamical correction to the Bethe-Salpeter equation beyond the plasmon-pole approximation.
    Loos PF; Blase X
    J Chem Phys; 2020 Sep; 153(11):114120. PubMed ID: 32962392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Excited-State Geometry Optimization of Small Molecules with Many-Body Green's Functions Theory.
    Çaylak O; Baumeier B
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Feb; 17(2):879-888. PubMed ID: 33399447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fragment-Based Excited-State Calculations Using the GW Approximation and the Bethe-Salpeter Equation.
    Fujita T; Noguchi Y
    J Phys Chem A; 2021 Dec; 125(49):10580-10592. PubMed ID: 34871000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantum-Quantum and Quantum-Quantum-Classical Schemes for Near-Gap Excitations with Projection-Based-Embedded
    Sundaram V; Baumeier B
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2024 Jul; 20(13):5451-5465. PubMed ID: 38916411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the Role of the Kohn-Sham Density in the Calculation of the Low-Lying Bethe-Salpeter Excitation Energies.
    Kshirsagar AR; Poloni R
    J Phys Chem A; 2023 Mar; 127(11):2618-2627. PubMed ID: 36913525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. All-electron ab initio Bethe-Salpeter equation approach to neutral excitations in molecules with numeric atom-centered orbitals.
    Liu C; Kloppenburg J; Yao Y; Ren X; Appel H; Kanai Y; Blum V
    J Chem Phys; 2020 Jan; 152(4):044105. PubMed ID: 32007075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combining localized orbital scaling correction and Bethe-Salpeter equation for accurate excitation energies.
    Li J; Jin Y; Su NQ; Yang W
    J Chem Phys; 2022 Apr; 156(15):154101. PubMed ID: 35459294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Non-linear light-matter interactions from the Bethe-Salpeter equation.
    Rauwolf N; Klopper W; Holzer C
    J Chem Phys; 2024 Feb; 160(6):. PubMed ID: 38341783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An assessment of low-lying excitation energies and triplet instabilities of organic molecules with an ab initio Bethe-Salpeter equation approach and the Tamm-Dancoff approximation.
    Rangel T; Hamed SM; Bruneval F; Neaton JB
    J Chem Phys; 2017 May; 146(19):194108. PubMed ID: 28527441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.