158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34901445)
1. The Current Portrayal of Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in a Portuguese Tertiary Center.
Falcão D; Alves da Silva J; Pereira Guedes T; Garrido M; Novo I; Pedroto I
GE Port J Gastroenterol; 2021; 28(6):392-397. PubMed ID: 34901445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Clinical Impact of Rockall and Glasgow-Blatchford Scores in Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Maia S; Falcão D; Silva J; Pedroto I
GE Port J Gastroenterol; 2021 Jul; 28(4):243-252. PubMed ID: 34386553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of various prognostic scores in variceal and non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A prospective cohort study.
Rout G; Sharma S; Gunjan D; Kedia S; Nayak B; Shalimar
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr; 38(2):158-166. PubMed ID: 30830583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding.
Bryant RV; Kuo P; Williamson K; Yam C; Schoeman MN; Holloway RH; Nguyen NQ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Oct; 78(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 23790755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Can Glasgow-Blatchford Score and Pre-endoscopic Rockall Score Predict the Occurrence of Hypotension in Initially Normotensive Patients with Non-variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding?].
Kim JS; Ko BS; Son CH; Ahn S; Seo DW; Lee YS; Lee JH; Oh BJ; Lim KS; Kim WY
Korean J Gastroenterol; 2016 Jan; 67(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 26809627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Kim MS; Choi J; Shin WC
BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):136. PubMed ID: 31349816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of AIMS65 Score and Other Scoring Systems for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Koreans with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Park SM; Yeum SC; Kim BW; Kim JS; Kim JH; Sim EH; Ji JS; Choi H
Gut Liver; 2016 Jul; 10(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 27377742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Two Scoring Systems in Predicting Outcomes in Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Taiwanese Population.
Wang CH; Hung MS; Wu KH; Chen YC
J Acute Med; 2017 Sep; 7(3):115-121. PubMed ID: 32995182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Peptic Ulcer Is the Most Common Cause of Non-Variceal Upper-Gastrointestinal Bleeding (NVUGIB) in China.
Lu M; Sun G; Zhang XM; Xv YQ; Chen SY; Song Y; Li XL; Lv B; Ren JL; Chen XQ; Zhang H; Mo C; Wang YZ; Yang YS
Med Sci Monit; 2018 Oct; 24():7119-7129. PubMed ID: 30291716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment and prognosis in peptic ulcer bleeding.
Laursen SB
Dan Med J; 2014 Jan; 61(1):B4797. PubMed ID: 24547604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Glasgow Blatchford, pre-endoscopic Rockall and AIMS65 scores show no difference in predicting rebleeding rate and mortality in variceal bleeding.
Budimir I; Gradišer M; Nikolić M; Baršić N; Ljubičić N; Kralj D; Budimir I
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Nov; 51(11):1375-9. PubMed ID: 27356670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective Comparison of the AIMS65 Score, Glasgow-Blatchford Score, and Rockall Score for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Variceal and Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Chang A; Ouejiaraphant C; Akarapatima K; Rattanasupa A; Prachayakul V
Clin Endosc; 2021 Mar; 54(2):211-221. PubMed ID: 32668528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are Short-Stay Units Safe and Effective in the Treatment of Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding?
Candelli M; Lumare M; Riccioni ME; Mestice A; Ojetti V; Pignataro G; Merra G; Piccioni A; Gabrielli M; Gasbarrini A; Franceschi F
Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 May; 59(6):. PubMed ID: 37374225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. AGA Clinical Practice Update on Endoscopic Therapies for Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Expert Review.
Mullady DK; Wang AY; Waschke KA
Gastroenterology; 2020 Sep; 159(3):1120-1128. PubMed ID: 32574620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictors of early rebleeding after endoscopic therapy in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to high-risk lesions.
Maggio D; Barkun AN; Martel M; Elouali S; Gralnek IM;
Can J Gastroenterol; 2013 Aug; 27(8):454-8. PubMed ID: 23936874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the quick SOFA score with Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scores in predicting severity in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Taslidere B; Sonmez E; Özcan AB; Mehmetaj L; Keskin EB; Gulen B
Am J Emerg Med; 2021 Jul; 45():29-36. PubMed ID: 33647759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
Yaka E; Yılmaz S; Doğan NÖ; Pekdemir M
Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Antithrombotic drugs and non-variceal bleeding outcomes and risk scoring systems: comparison of Glasgow Blatchford, Rockall and Charlson scores.
Taha AS; McCloskey C; Craigen T; Angerson WJ
Frontline Gastroenterol; 2016 Oct; 7(4):257-263. PubMed ID: 28839866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity of the Pre-endoscopic Scoring Systems for the Prediction of the Failure of Endoscopic Hemostasis in Bleeding Gastroduodenal Peptic Ulcers.
Iino C; Shimoyama T; Igarashi T; Aihara T; Ishii K; Sakamoto J; Tono H; Fukuda S
Intern Med; 2018 May; 57(10):1355-1360. PubMed ID: 29321420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multicenter evaluation of first-line endoscopic treatment with the OTSC in acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding and comparison with the Rockall cohort: the FLETRock study.
Wedi E; Fischer A; Hochberger J; Jung C; Orkut S; Richter-Schrag HJ
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):307-314. PubMed ID: 28656336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
