These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34902501)

  • 1. Specialists' opinion regarding factors related to wet loads after steam sterilization.
    Barbosa Rodrigues S; Queiroz de Souza R; Uchikawa Graziano K; Sidnei Erzinger G
    J Hosp Infect; 2022 Feb; 120():117-122. PubMed ID: 34902501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A survey to quantify wet loads after steam sterilization processes in healthcare facilities.
    van Doornmalen JPCM; Tessarolo F; Lapanaitis N; Henrotin K; Inglese A; Oussoren HW; Queiroz de Souza R
    J Hosp Infect; 2019 Sep; 103(1):e105-e109. PubMed ID: 31132393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigating steam penetration using thermometric methods in dental handpieces with narrow internal lumens during sterilizing processes with non-vacuum or vacuum processes.
    Winter S; Smith A; Lappin D; McDonagh G; Kirk B
    J Hosp Infect; 2017 Dec; 97(4):338-342. PubMed ID: 28778810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of Wet Pack Incidence in Steam Sterilization: A Study in a Chinese Medical Center.
    Chen Y; Bao L; Yi L; Hu R
    Med Sci Monit; 2024 Mar; 30():e942601. PubMed ID: 38493296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors concerned in the efficient steam sterilization of surgical dressings.
    FALLON RJ
    J Clin Pathol; 1961 Sep; 14(5):505-11. PubMed ID: 13891475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reason behind wet pack after steam sterilization and its consequences: An overview from Central Sterile Supply Department of a cancer center in eastern India.
    Basu D
    J Infect Public Health; 2017; 10(2):235-239. PubMed ID: 27450707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Alternate Approach for Defining Worst Case in Steam Sterilization Validation of Porous/Hard Goods Loads.
    Chakraborty S; Soman V; Dhumal V
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2021; 75(1):91-99. PubMed ID: 32817322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Updated review of wet pack complications in pulse vacuum pressure steam sterilisation processes in central sterile supply departments.
    Huang Q; Tang J; Zhu J; Tan H; Huang Y; He G
    Trop Doct; 2024 Apr; 54(2):116-122. PubMed ID: 38105600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of rapid readout biological indicators for 132 degrees C gravity and 132 degrees C vacuum-assisted steam sterilization cycles using a new automated fluorescent reader.
    Alfa MJ; Olson N; DeGagne P; Jackson M
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2002 Jul; 23(7):388-92. PubMed ID: 12138978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monitoring sterilization of dressings in high-vacuum pressure-steam sterilizers.
    FALLON RJ
    J Clin Pathol; 1961 Nov; 14(6):666-9. PubMed ID: 13891476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Sterilization effect analysis of B-class pulsation table top vacuum sterilizer to dental handpieces].
    Zeng SR; Jiang B; Xiao XR
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Jun; 25(3):269-71. PubMed ID: 17629204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of a rapid readout biological indicator for 121 degrees C gravity and 132 degrees C vacuum-assisted steam sterilization cycles.
    Vesley D; Nellis MA; Allwood PB
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 1995 May; 16(5):281-6. PubMed ID: 7657976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Tale of Two Sterilizers.
    Agalloco JP
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2020; 74(1):162-169. PubMed ID: 30770480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Troubleshooting failed sterilization loads: Process failures and wet packs/loads.
    Seavey R
    Am J Infect Control; 2016 May; 44(5 Suppl):e29-34. PubMed ID: 27131132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a new rapid readout biological indicator for use in 132°C and 135°C vacuum-assisted steam sterilization cycles.
    Schneider PM
    Am J Infect Control; 2014 Feb; 42(2):e17-21. PubMed ID: 24485381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of three types of sterilization on the contents of sharps containers.
    Sheldrake MA; Majors CD; Gaines DJ; Palenik CJ
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Nov; 26(11):771-8. PubMed ID: 8628836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Steam quality monitoring as a strategy to reduce wet packs and sterilization failure.
    Miguel EA; Dos Santos FP; Laranjeira PR; Ishii M; Pinto TJA
    Am J Infect Control; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38972599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Criteria for evaluating and choosing a method of drying medical objects after steam sterilization].
    Tsibikov VB; Rabin'kiĭ BIa
    Med Tekh; 1986; (3):15-8. PubMed ID: 3747774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Failure of non-vacuum steam sterilization processes for dental handpieces.
    Winter S; Smith A; Lappin D; McDonagh G; Kirk B
    J Hosp Infect; 2017 Dec; 97(4):343-347. PubMed ID: 28903057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new vacuum-packaging process for in-hospital steam sterilization.
    Sanderson RS
    Med Instrum; 1983; 17(3):252-4. PubMed ID: 6877131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.