These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34903170)

  • 1. AttCRISPR: a spacetime interpretable model for prediction of sgRNA on-target activity.
    Xiao LM; Wan YQ; Jiang ZR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Dec; 22(1):589. PubMed ID: 34903170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. BoostMEC: predicting CRISPR-Cas9 cleavage efficiency through boosting models.
    Zarate OA; Yang Y; Wang X; Wang JP
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Oct; 23(1):446. PubMed ID: 36289480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A generalizable Cas9/sgRNA prediction model using machine transfer learning with small high-quality datasets.
    Ham DT; Browne TS; Banglorewala PN; Wilson TL; Michael RK; Gloor GB; Edgell DR
    Nat Commun; 2023 Sep; 14(1):5514. PubMed ID: 37679324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interpretable CRISPR/Cas9 off-target activities with mismatches and indels prediction using BERT.
    Luo Y; Chen Y; Xie H; Zhu W; Zhang G
    Comput Biol Med; 2024 Feb; 169():107932. PubMed ID: 38199209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of sgRNA on-target activity in bacteria by deep learning.
    Wang L; Zhang J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Oct; 20(1):517. PubMed ID: 31651233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction of off-target specificity and cell-specific fitness of CRISPR-Cas System using attention boosted deep learning and network-based gene feature.
    Liu Q; He D; Xie L
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Oct; 15(10):e1007480. PubMed ID: 31658261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Benchmarking deep learning methods for predicting CRISPR/Cas9 sgRNA on- and off-target activities.
    Zhang G; Luo Y; Dai X; Dai Z
    Brief Bioinform; 2023 Sep; 24(6):. PubMed ID: 37775147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CRISPRpred(SEQ): a sequence-based method for sgRNA on target activity prediction using traditional machine learning.
    Muhammad Rafid AH; Toufikuzzaman M; Rahman MS; Rahman MS
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Jun; 21(1):223. PubMed ID: 32487025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CNN-XG: A Hybrid Framework for sgRNA On-Target Prediction.
    Li B; Ai D; Liu X
    Biomolecules; 2022 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 35327601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. DeepCRISTL: deep transfer learning to predict CRISPR/Cas9 functional and endogenous on-target editing efficiency.
    Elkayam S; Orenstein Y
    Bioinformatics; 2022 Jun; 38(Suppl 1):i161-i168. PubMed ID: 35758815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using traditional machine learning and deep learning methods for on- and off-target prediction in CRISPR/Cas9: a review.
    Sherkatghanad Z; Abdar M; Charlier J; Makarenkov V
    Brief Bioinform; 2023 May; 24(3):. PubMed ID: 37080758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of CRISPR/Cas9 single guide RNA cleavage efficiency and specificity by attention-based convolutional neural networks.
    Zhang G; Zeng T; Dai Z; Dai X
    Comput Struct Biotechnol J; 2021; 19():1445-1457. PubMed ID: 33841753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Deep learning improves the ability of sgRNA off-target propensity prediction.
    Liu Q; Cheng X; Liu G; Li B; Liu X
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Feb; 21(1):51. PubMed ID: 32041517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. DeepCRISPR: optimized CRISPR guide RNA design by deep learning.
    Chuai G; Ma H; Yan J; Chen M; Hong N; Xue D; Zhou C; Zhu C; Chen K; Duan B; Gu F; Qu S; Huang D; Wei J; Liu Q
    Genome Biol; 2018 Jun; 19(1):80. PubMed ID: 29945655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. TransCrispr: Transformer Based Hybrid Model for Predicting CRISPR/Cas9 Single Guide RNA Cleavage Efficiency.
    Wan Y; Jiang Z
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2023; 20(2):1518-1528. PubMed ID: 36006888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interpretable neural architecture search and transfer learning for understanding CRISPR-Cas9 off-target enzymatic reactions.
    Zhang Z; Lamson AR; Shelley M; Troyanskaya O
    Nat Comput Sci; 2023 Dec; 3(12):1056-1066. PubMed ID: 38177723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Potential high-frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR/Cas9 in Arabidopsis and its prevention.
    Zhang Q; Xing HL; Wang ZP; Zhang HY; Yang F; Wang XC; Chen QJ
    Plant Mol Biol; 2018 Mar; 96(4-5):445-456. PubMed ID: 29476306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Boosting activity of high-fidelity CRISPR/Cas9 variants using a tRNA
    He X; Wang Y; Yang F; Wang B; Xie H; Gu L; Zhao T; Liu X; Zhang D; Ren Q; Liu X; Liu Y; Gao C; Gu F
    J Biol Chem; 2019 Jun; 294(23):9308-9315. PubMed ID: 31010827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Whole genome analysis of CRISPR Cas9 sgRNA off-target homologies via an efficient computational algorithm.
    Zhou H; Zhou M; Li D; Manthey J; Lioutikova E; Wang H; Zeng X
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Nov; 18(Suppl 9):826. PubMed ID: 29219081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A machine learning approach for predicting CRISPR-Cas9 cleavage efficiencies and patterns underlying its mechanism of action.
    Abadi S; Yan WX; Amar D; Mayrose I
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Oct; 13(10):e1005807. PubMed ID: 29036168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.