BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34903436)

  • 1. Breast cancer screening in average and high-risk women.
    Rahman WT; Helvie MA
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Sep; 83():3-14. PubMed ID: 34903436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Moseley TW
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jun; 59(2):362-79. PubMed ID: 27101241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiation-Induced Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality From Digital Mammography Screening: A Modeling Study.
    Miglioretti DL; Lange J; van den Broek JJ; Lee CI; van Ravesteyn NT; Ritley D; Kerlikowske K; Fenton JJ; Melnikow J; de Koning HJ; Hubbard RA
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):205-14. PubMed ID: 26756460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mammography screening: A major issue in medicine.
    Autier P; Boniol M
    Eur J Cancer; 2018 Feb; 90():34-62. PubMed ID: 29272783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years at average risk for breast cancer: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2007; 7(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 23074501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.
    Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Overall assessment system of combined mammography and ultrasound for breast cancer screening in Japan.
    Ohnuki K; Tohno E; Tsunoda H; Uematsu T; Nakajima Y
    Breast Cancer; 2021 Mar; 28(2):254-262. PubMed ID: 33389614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis: Recent Advances in Imaging and Current Limitations.
    Gegios AR; Peterson MS; Fowler AM
    PET Clin; 2023 Oct; 18(4):459-471. PubMed ID: 37296043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital mammography imaging: breast tomosynthesis and advanced applications.
    Helvie MA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):917-29. PubMed ID: 20868894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Collaborative Modeling of the Benefits and Harms Associated With Different U.S. Breast Cancer Screening Strategies.
    Mandelblatt JS; Stout NK; Schechter CB; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Krapcho M; Trentham-Dietz A; Munoz D; Lee SJ; Berry DA; van Ravesteyn NT; Alagoz O; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson AN; Near AM; Hoeffken A; Chang Y; Heijnsdijk EA; Chisholm G; Huang X; Huang H; Ergun MA; Gangnon R; Sprague BL; Plevritis S; Feuer E; de Koning HJ; Cronin KA
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):215-25. PubMed ID: 26756606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital breast tomosynthesis plus synthesised mammography versus digital screening mammography for the detection of invasive breast cancer (TOSYMA): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, superiority trial.
    Heindel W; Weigel S; Gerß J; Hense HW; Sommer A; Krischke M; Kerschke L;
    Lancet Oncol; 2022 May; 23(5):601-611. PubMed ID: 35427470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast Cancer Screening for Women at Higher-Than-Average Risk: Updated Recommendations From the ACR.
    Monticciolo DL; Newell MS; Moy L; Lee CS; Destounis SV
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2023 Sep; 20(9):902-914. PubMed ID: 37150275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screening for Breast Cancer.
    Niell BL; Freer PE; Weinfurtner RJ; Arleo EK; Drukteinis JS
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 Nov; 55(6):1145-1162. PubMed ID: 28991557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening: The Reggio Emilia Tomosynthesis Randomized Trial.
    Pattacini P; Nitrosi A; Giorgi Rossi P; Iotti V; Ginocchi V; Ravaioli S; Vacondio R; Braglia L; Cavuto S; Campari C;
    Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):375-385. PubMed ID: 29869961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Mammography in Older Women.
    Upneja A; Long JB; Aminawung JA; Kyanko KA; Kunst N; Xu X; Busch SH; Gross CP; Richman IB
    J Gen Intern Med; 2022 Jun; 37(8):1870-1876. PubMed ID: 34595682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Skaane P
    Breast Cancer; 2017 Jan; 24(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 27138386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Screening outcome for consecutive examinations with digital breast tomosynthesis versus standard digital mammography in a population-based screening program.
    Hovda T; Brandal SHB; Sebuødegård S; Holen ÅS; Bjørndal H; Skaane P; Hofvind S
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):6991-6999. PubMed ID: 31187221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interval breast cancers in the 'screening with tomosynthesis or standard mammography' (STORM) population-based trial.
    Houssami N; Bernardi D; Caumo F; Brunelli S; Fantò C; Valentini M; Romanucci G; Gentilini MA; Zorzi M; Macaskill P
    Breast; 2018 Apr; 38():150-153. PubMed ID: 29328943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tomosynthesis Impact on Breast Cancer Screening in Patients Younger Than 50 Years Old.
    Rose SL; Shisler JL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jun; 210(6):1401-1404. PubMed ID: 29629810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.