These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34904067)

  • 1. Multiphysics Analysis of Ultrasonic Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Side Effects on Surrounding Tissues.
    Moghimnezhad M; Shahidian A; Andayesh M
    J Biomed Phys Eng; 2021 Dec; 11(6):701-712. PubMed ID: 34904067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of tissue injury from focused ultrasonic propulsion of kidney stones versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Connors BA; Evan AP; Blomgren PM; Hsi RS; Harper JD; Sorensen MD; Wang YN; Simon JC; Paun M; Starr F; Cunitz BW; Bailey MR; Lingeman JE
    J Urol; 2014 Jan; 191(1):235-41. PubMed ID: 23917165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Experimentally validated multiphysics computational model of focusing and shock wave formation in an electromagnetic lithotripter.
    Fovargue DE; Mitran S; Smith NB; Sankin GN; Simmons WN; Zhong P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1598-609. PubMed ID: 23927200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Kidney damage in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a numerical approach for different shock profiles.
    Weinberg K; Ortiz M
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2009 Aug; 8(4):285-99. PubMed ID: 18807077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for isolated lower pole calculi compared with isolated middle and upper caliceal calculi.
    Obek C; Onal B; Kantay K; Kalkan M; Yalçin V; Oner A; Solok V; Tansu N
    J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2081-4; discussion 2085. PubMed ID: 11696710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combined short and long-delay tandem shock waves to improve shock wave lithotripsy according to the Gilmore-Akulichev theory.
    de Icaza-Herrera M; Fernández F; Loske AM
    Ultrasonics; 2015 Apr; 58():53-9. PubMed ID: 25553714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An FDTD-based computer simulation platform for shock wave propagation in electrohydraulic lithotripsy.
    Yılmaz B; Çiftçi E
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Jun; 110(3):389-98. PubMed ID: 23261077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Structure Types of Kidney Stones and Their Susceptibility to Shock Wave Fragmentation.
    Kolupayev S; Lesovoy V; Bereznyak E; Andonieva N; Shchukin D
    Acta Inform Med; 2021 Mar; 29(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 34012210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of energy density and acoustic cavitation in shock wave lithotripsy.
    Loske AM
    Ultrasonics; 2010 Feb; 50(2):300-5. PubMed ID: 19819511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A novel method to control P+/P- ratio of the shock wave pulses used in the extracorporeal piezoelectric lithotripsy (EPL).
    Lewin PA; Chapelon JY; Mestas JL; Birer A; Cathignol D
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1990; 16(5):473-88. PubMed ID: 2238254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shock wave-bubble interaction near soft and rigid boundaries during lithotripsy: numerical analysis by the improved ghost fluid method.
    Kobayashi K; Kodama T; Takahira H
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(19):6421-40. PubMed ID: 21918295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acoustic and mechanical properties of artificial stones in comparison to natural kidney stones.
    Heimbach D; Munver R; Zhong P; Jacobs J; Hesse A; Müller SC; Preminger GM
    J Urol; 2000 Aug; 164(2):537-44. PubMed ID: 10893640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shifting the Split Reflectors to Enhance Stone Fragmentation of Shock Wave Lithotripsy.
    Wang JC; Zhou Y
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1876-89. PubMed ID: 27166016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhanced kidney stone fragmentation by short delay tandem conventional and modified lithotriptor shock waves: a numerical analysis.
    Tham LM; Lee HP; Lu C
    J Urol; 2007 Jul; 178(1):314-9. PubMed ID: 17499770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Management of Proximal Ureteric Stones: Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) Versus Ureterorenoscopic Lithotripsy (URSL).
    Joshi HN; Shrestha B; Karmacharya RM; Makaju S; Koju R; Gyawali D
    Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2017 Oct.-Dec.; 15(60):343-346. PubMed ID: 30580354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling elastic wave propagation in kidney stones with application to shock wave lithotripsy.
    Cleveland RO; Sapozhnikov OA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Oct; 118(4):2667-76. PubMed ID: 16266186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What makes a shock wave efficient in lithotripsy?
    Granz B; Köhler G
    J Stone Dis; 1992 Apr; 4(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 10149177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of Stepwise Voltage Escalation on Treatment Outcomes following Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy of Renal Calculi: A Prospective Randomized Study.
    Ng CF; Yee CH; Teoh JYC; Lau B; Leung SCH; Wong CYP; Wong KT; Chu WCW; Yuen J
    J Urol; 2019 Nov; 202(5):986-993. PubMed ID: 31112104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tandem shock wave cavitation enhancement for extracorporeal lithotripsy.
    Loske AM; Prieto FE; Fernandez F; van Cauwelaert J
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Nov; 47(22):3945-57. PubMed ID: 12476975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is there a role for prophylactic shock wave lithotripsy for asymptomatic calyceal stones?
    Collins JW; Keeley FX
    Curr Opin Urol; 2002 Jul; 12(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 12072647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.