These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34904247)

  • 1. Giomer composite compared to glass ionomer in occlusoproximal ART restorations of primary molars: 24-month RCT.
    Pássaro AL; Olegário IC; Laux CM; Oliveira RC; Tedesco TK; Raggio DP
    Aust Dent J; 2022 Jun; 67(2):148-158. PubMed ID: 34904247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation and comparison of silorane resin composite to glass ionomer in occluso-proximal restorations of primary molars: A randomized controlled trial.
    Maru VP; Kulkarni P; Chauhan R; Bapat SS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2022; 40(3):281-287. PubMed ID: 36260469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Survival rate of primary molar restorations is not influenced by hand mixed or encapsulated GIC: 24 months RCT.
    Oliveira RC; Camargo LB; Novaes TF; Pontes LRA; Olegário IC; Gimenez T; Pássaro AL; Tedesco TK; Braga MM; Mendes FM; Raggio DP
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Jul; 21(1):371. PubMed ID: 34301217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 2-year survival and cost analysis of occlusoproximal ART restorations using encapsulated glass ionomer cement in primary molars: a randomized controlled trial.
    Garbim JR; Saihara CS; Olegário IC; Hesse D; Araujo MP; Bonifácio CC; Braga MM; Raggio DP
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):647. PubMed ID: 38824540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Glass carbomer and compomer for ART restorations: 3-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Olegário IC; Hesse D; Mendes FM; Bonifácio CC; Raggio DP
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Apr; 23(4):1761-1770. PubMed ID: 30171345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Atraumatic restorative treatment versus conventional restorative treatment for managing dental caries.
    Dorri M; Martinez-Zapata MJ; Walsh T; Marinho VC; Sheiham Deceased A; Zaror C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 12(12):CD008072. PubMed ID: 29284075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Low-cost GICs reduce survival rate in occlusal ART restorations in primary molars after one year: A RCT.
    Olegário IC; Pacheco AL; de Araújo MP; Ladewig NM; Bonifácio CC; Imparato JC; Raggio DP
    J Dent; 2017 Feb; 57():45-50. PubMed ID: 27956016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does low-cost GIC have the same survival rate as high-viscosity GIC in atraumatic restorative treatments? A RCT.
    Moura MS; Sousa GP; Brito MHSF; Silva MCC; Lima MDM; Moura LFAD; Lima CCB
    Braz Oral Res; 2020; 33():e125. PubMed ID: 31994598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A clinical evaluation of resin-based composite and glass ionomer cement restorations placed in primary teeth using the ART approach: results at 24 months.
    Ersin NK; Candan U; Aykut A; Onçağ O; Eronat C; Kose T
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2006 Nov; 137(11):1529-36. PubMed ID: 17082278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bilayer technique and nano-filled coating increase success of approximal ART restorations: a randomized clinical trial.
    Hesse D; Bonifácio CC; Guglielmi Cde A; Bönecker M; van Amerongen WE; Raggio DP
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2016 May; 26(3):231-9. PubMed ID: 26370224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of conventional treatment using bulk-fill composite resin versus Atraumatic Restorative Treatments in primary and permanent dentition: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial.
    Olegário IC; Hesse D; Bönecker M; Imparato JC; Braga MM; Mendes FM; Raggio DP
    BMC Oral Health; 2016 Aug; 17(1):34. PubMed ID: 27485432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical performance of glass ionomer cement and composite resin in Class II restorations in primary teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Dias AGA; Magno MB; Delbem ACB; Cunha RF; Maia LC; Pessan JP
    J Dent; 2018 Jun; 73():1-13. PubMed ID: 29649506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is it worth using low-cost glass ionomer cements for occlusal ART restorations in primary molars? 2-year survival and cost analysis of a Randomized clinical trial.
    Olegário IC; Ladewig NM; Hesse D; Bonifácio CC; Braga MM; Imparato JCP; Mendes FM; Raggio DP
    J Dent; 2020 Oct; 101():103446. PubMed ID: 32758684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Restoration of permanent teeth in young rural children in Cambodia using the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique and Fuji II glass ionomer cement.
    Mallow PK; Durward CS; Klaipo M
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 1998 Mar; 8(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9558544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of atraumatic restorative treatment on adhesive restorations for dental caries in deciduous molars.
    de Medeiros Serpa EB; Clementino MA; Granville-Garcia AF; Rosenblatt A
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2017; 35(2):167-173. PubMed ID: 28492197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conventional versus resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for Class II restorations in primary molars. A 3-year clinical study.
    Hübel S; Mejàre I
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2003 Jan; 13(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 12542617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Silver diamine fluoride modified atraumatic restorative treatment compared to conventional restorative technique on carious primary molars-A randomized controlled trial.
    Bansal K; Shamoo A; Mani K; K PD; Verma A; Mathur VP; Tewari N
    J Dent; 2023 Nov; 138():104698. PubMed ID: 37704105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term clinical performance of heat-cured high-viscosity glass ionomer class II restorations versus resin-based composites in primary molars: a randomized comparison trial.
    Kupietzky A; Atia Joachim D; Tal E; Moskovitz M
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2019 Oct; 20(5):451-456. PubMed ID: 30820833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. One year Survival Rate of Ketac Molar versus Vitro Molar for Occlusoproximal ART Restorations: a RCT.
    Anna Luisa de Brito P; Isabel Cristina O; Clarissa Calil B; Ana Flávia Bissoto C; José Carlos Pettorossi I; Daniela Prócida R
    Braz Oral Res; 2017 Nov; 31():e88. PubMed ID: 29116299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Longevity of posterior restorations in primary teeth: results from a paediatric dental clinic.
    Pinto Gdos S; Oliveira LJ; Romano AR; Schardosim LR; Bonow ML; Pacce M; Correa MB; Demarco FF; Torriani DD
    J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1248-54. PubMed ID: 25150105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.