These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34905141)

  • 21. How much energy do we need to ablate 1 cubic millimeter of stone during Thulium Fiber Laser lithotripsy? An in vitro study.
    Panthier F; Chicaud M; Doizi S; Kutchukian S; Lapouge P; Solano C; Candela L; Daudon M; Berthe L; Corrales M; Traxer O
    World J Urol; 2024 Jan; 42(1):57. PubMed ID: 38280001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of Superpulse Thulium Fiber Laser
    Jiang P; Okhunov Z; Afyouni AS; Ali S; Hosseini Sharifi SH; Bhatt R; Brevik A; Ayad M; Larson K; Osann K; Patel RM; Landman J; Clayman RV
    J Endourol; 2023 Mar; 37(3):335-340. PubMed ID: 36401505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How Lasers Ablate Stones:
    Taratkin M; Laukhtina E; Singla N; Tarasov A; Alekseeva T; Enikeev M; Enikeev D
    J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):931-936. PubMed ID: 31885281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Preclinical comparison of superpulse thulium fiber laser and a holmium:YAG laser for lithotripsy.
    Andreeva V; Vinarov A; Yaroslavsky I; Kovalenko A; Vybornov A; Rapoport L; Enikeev D; Sorokin N; Dymov A; Tsarichenko D; Glybochko P; Fried N; Traxer O; Altshuler G; Gapontsev V
    World J Urol; 2020 Feb; 38(2):497-503. PubMed ID: 31055626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. What to expect from the novel pulsed thulium:YAG laser? A systematic review of endourological applications.
    Ventimiglia E; Robesti D; Bevilacqua L; Tondelli E; Oliva I; Orecchia L; Juliebø-Jones P; Pietropaolo A; De Coninck V; Esperto F; Tailly T; Ferretti S; Gauhar V; Somani B; Villa L; Keller EX; Salonia A; Traxer O; Kartalas Goumas I
    World J Urol; 2023 Nov; 41(11):3301-3308. PubMed ID: 37682286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative Analyses and Ablation Efficiency of Thulium Fiber Laser by Stone Composition.
    Johnson J; Lee J; Movassaghi M; Han D; Pingle SR; Williams J; Schulster M; Gorroochurn P; Shao Y; Shah O
    J Urol; 2024 Mar; 211(3):445-454. PubMed ID: 38134235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Experts' recommendations in laser use for the treatment of urolithiasis: a comprehensive guide by the European Section of Uro-Technology (ESUT) and Training-Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group.
    Ortner G; Somani BK; Güven S; Kitzbichler G; Traxer O; Giusti G; Proietti S; Liatsikos E; Kallidonis P; Krambeck A; Goumas IK; Duvdevani M; Kamphuis GM; Ferretti S; Dragos L; Ghani K; Miernik A; Juliebø-Jones P; Jung H; Tailly T; Pietropaolo A; Hamri SB; Papatsoris A; Sarica K; Scoffone CM; Cracco CM; Keller EX; Durutovic O; Pereira S; Herrmann TRW; Nagele U; Gözen AS; Tokas T
    World J Urol; 2024 Jan; 42(1):33. PubMed ID: 38217743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical Comparison of Super Pulse Thulium Fiber Laser and High-Power Holmium Laser for Ureteral Stone Management.
    Martov AG; Ergakov DV; Guseynov M; Andronov AS; Plekhanova OA
    J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):795-800. PubMed ID: 33238763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser with MOSES technology is more efficient than thulium fibre laser in supine mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
    Vergamini LB; Ito W; Choi B N; Du HE; Sardiu ME; Neff D; Duchene DA; Molina WR; Whiles BB
    BJU Int; 2024 Aug; 134(2):276-282. PubMed ID: 38797721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Gas Bubble Anatomy During Laser Lithotripsy: An Experimental
    Petzold R; Suarez-Ibarrola R; Miernik A
    J Endourol; 2021 Jul; 35(7):1051-1057. PubMed ID: 33207950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Thulium Fiber Laser Versus Holmium:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet for Lithotripsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Uleri A; Farré A; Izquierdo P; Angerri O; Kanashiro A; Balaña J; Gauhar V; Castellani D; Sanchez-Martin F; Monga M; Serrano A; Gupta M; Baboudjian M; Gallioli A; Breda A; Emiliani E
    Eur Urol; 2024 Jun; 85(6):529-540. PubMed ID: 38290963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Temperature rise during ureteral laser lithotripsy: comparison of super pulse thulium fiber laser (SPTF) vs high power 120 W holmium-YAG laser (Ho:YAG).
    Molina WR; Carrera RV; Chew BH; Knudsen BE
    World J Urol; 2021 Oct; 39(10):3951-3956. PubMed ID: 33604733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. High power holmium:YAG versus thulium fiber laser treatment of kidney stones in dusting mode: ablation rate and fragment size studies.
    Hardy LA; Vinnichenko V; Fried NM
    Lasers Surg Med; 2019 Aug; 51(6):522-530. PubMed ID: 30648761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Experimental verification of thulium lithotripsy].
    Rapoport LM; Vinarov AZ; Sorokin NI; Dymov AM; Enikeev DV; Tsarichenko DG; Lekarev VY; Klimov RE; Andreeva VA; Kovalenko AA
    Urologiia; 2018 Dec; (5):74-80. PubMed ID: 30575354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of Holmium:YAG and Thulium Fiber Lasers on Soft Tissue: An
    Doizi S; Germain T; Panthier F; Compérat E; Traxer O; Berthe L
    J Endourol; 2022 Feb; 36(2):251-258. PubMed ID: 34409842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Thulium fiber laser vs Ho:YAG in RIRS: a prospective randomized clinical trial assessing the efficacy of lasers and different fiber diameters (150 µm and 200 µm).
    Taratkin M; Azilgareeva C; Petov V; Morozov A; Ali S; Babaevskaya D; De Coninck V; Korolev D; Akopyan G; Scoffone CM; Chinenov D; Androsov A; Fajkovic H; Lifshitz D; Traxer O; Enikeev D
    World J Urol; 2023 Dec; 41(12):3705-3711. PubMed ID: 37855897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Is "Kidney Stone Calculator" efficient in predicting ureteroscopic lithotripsy duration? A holmium:YAG and thulium fiber lasers comparative analysis.
    Chicaud M; Kutchukian S; Doizi S; Audenet F; Berthe L; Yonneau L; Lebret T; Timsit MO; Mejean A; Candela L; Solano C; Corrales M; Duquesne I; Descazeaud A; Traxer O; Panthier F
    World J Urol; 2024 Apr; 42(1):233. PubMed ID: 38613608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Tissue thermal effect during lithotripsy and tissue ablation in endourology: a systematic review of experimental studies comparing Holmium and Thulium lasers.
    Ortner G; Rice P; Nagele U; Herrmann TRW; Somani BK; Tokas T
    World J Urol; 2023 Jan; 41(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 36515722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Getting hot in here! Comparison of Holmium vs. thulium laser in an anatomic hydrogel kidney model.
    Wanderling C; Saxton A; Phan D; Doersch KM; Shepard L; Schuler N; Hassig S; Quarrier S; Osinski T; Ghazi A
    Urolithiasis; 2024 Mar; 52(1):49. PubMed ID: 38520506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Temperature Assessment of a Novel Pulsed Thulium Solid-State Laser Compared with a Holmium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Laser.
    Petzold R; Suarez-Ibarrola R; Miernik A
    J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):853-859. PubMed ID: 33191783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.