These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34905215)

  • 21. An improved method for permeability estimation of the bioclastic limestone reservoir based on NMR data.
    Ge X; Fan Y; Liu J; Zhang L; Han Y; Xing D
    J Magn Reson; 2017 Oct; 283():96-109. PubMed ID: 28923777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Estimation of hydraulic parameters in a complex porous aquifer system using geoelectrical methods.
    Kazakis N; Vargemezis G; Voudouris KS
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Apr; 550():742-750. PubMed ID: 26849338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Transient Recharge Estimability Through Field-Scale Groundwater Model Calibration.
    Knowling MJ; Werner AD
    Ground Water; 2017 Nov; 55(6):827-840. PubMed ID: 28498485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of empirical, semi-empirical and physically based models of soil hydraulic functions derived for bi-modal soils.
    Kutílek M; Jendele L; Krejca M
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Feb; 104(1-4):84-9. PubMed ID: 19022525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Constraining groundwater modeling with magnetic resonance soundings.
    Boucher M; Favreau G; Nazoumou Y; Cappelaere B; Massuel S; Legchenko A
    Ground Water; 2012; 50(5):775-84. PubMed ID: 22150349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Characterization of subsoil heterogeneity, estimation of grain size distribution and hydraulic conductivity at the Krauthausen test site using Cone Penetration Test.
    Tillmann A; Englert A; Nyari Z; Fejes I; Vanderborght J; Vereecken H
    J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Jan; 95(1-2):57-75. PubMed ID: 17920726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Field study of hydrogeologic characterization methods in a heterogeneous aquifer.
    Alexander M; Berg SJ; Illman WA
    Ground Water; 2011; 49(3):365-82. PubMed ID: 21671501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reconsideration at field scale of the relationship between hydraulic conductivity and porosity: the case of a sandy aquifer in South Italy.
    Fallico C
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():537387. PubMed ID: 25180202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sensitivity analyses of the theoretical equations used in point velocity probe (PVP) data interpretation.
    Devlin JF
    J Contam Hydrol; 2016 Sep; 192():140-145. PubMed ID: 27454892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Groundwater flow velocities in karst aquifers; importance of spatial observation scale and hydraulic testing for contaminant transport prediction.
    Medici G; West LJ
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Aug; 28(32):43050-43063. PubMed ID: 34125385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Simulation Assessment of Direct Push Injection Logging for High-Resolution Aquifer Characterization.
    Liu G; Borden RC; Butler JJ
    Ground Water; 2019 Jul; 57(4):562-574. PubMed ID: 30178579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Geophysical constraints on contaminant transport modeling in a heterogeneous fluvial aquifer.
    Bowling JC; Zheng C; Rodriguez AB; Harry DL
    J Contam Hydrol; 2006 May; 85(1-2):72-88. PubMed ID: 16574272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Electromagnetic-induction logging to monitor changing chloride concentrations.
    Metzger LF; Izbicki JA
    Ground Water; 2013; 51(1):108-21. PubMed ID: 22607466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Quantifying motional dynamics in nuclear magnetic resonance logging.
    O'Neill KT; Hopper TAJ; Fridjonsson EO; Johns ML
    J Magn Reson; 2022 Apr; 337():107167. PubMed ID: 35217380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Improving estimates of groundwater velocity in a fractured rock borehole using hydraulic and tracer dilution methods.
    Maldaner CH; Quinn PM; Cherry JA; Parker BL
    J Contam Hydrol; 2018 Jul; 214():75-86. PubMed ID: 29907430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Field study of TCE diffusion profiles below DNAPL to assess aquitard integrity.
    Parker BL; Cherry JA; Chapman SW
    J Contam Hydrol; 2004 Oct; 74(1-4):197-230. PubMed ID: 15358493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Use of tandem circulation wells to measure hydraulic conductivity without groundwater extraction.
    Goltz MN; Huang J; Close ME; Flintoft MJ; Pang L
    J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Sep; 100(3-4):127-36. PubMed ID: 18674844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spin echo SPI methods for quantitative analysis of fluids in porous media.
    Li L; Han H; Balcom BJ
    J Magn Reson; 2009 Jun; 198(2):252-60. PubMed ID: 19307140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. NMR properties of petroleum reservoir fluids.
    Hirasaki GJ; Lo SW; Zhang Y
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2003; 21(3-4):269-77. PubMed ID: 12850718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.