These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34905250)
1. Regulating Gene Editing in the Wild: Building Regulatory Capacity to Incorporate Deliberative Democracy. Maschke KJ; Gusmano MK Hastings Cent Rep; 2021 Nov; 51 Suppl 2():S42-S47. PubMed ID: 34905250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Deliberative Public Consultation via Deliberative Polling: Criteria and Methods. Fishkin JS Hastings Cent Rep; 2021 Nov; 51 Suppl 2():S19-S24. PubMed ID: 34905249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Empowering Indigenous Knowledge in Deliberations on Gene Editing in the Wild. Taitingfong R; Ullah A Hastings Cent Rep; 2021 Nov; 51 Suppl 2():S74-S84. PubMed ID: 34905244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Public Deliberation about Gene Editing in the Wild. Gusmano MK; Kaebnick GE; Maschke KJ; Neuhaus CP; Wills BC Hastings Cent Rep; 2021 Nov; 51 Suppl 2():S2-S10. PubMed ID: 34905246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the quality of democratic deliberation: a case study of public deliberation on the ethics of surrogate consent for research. De Vries R; Stanczyk A; Wall IF; Uhlmann R; Damschroder LJ; Kim SY Soc Sci Med; 2010 Jun; 70(12):1896-1903. PubMed ID: 20378225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Epistocracy for online deliberative bioethics. Schiavone G; Mameli M; Boniolo G Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2015 Jul; 24(3):272-80. PubMed ID: 26059953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stock options, tax credits or employment contracts please! The value of deliberative public disagreement about human tissue donation. Walmsley HL Soc Sci Med; 2011 Jul; 73(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 21683492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Abelson J; Forest PG; Eyles J; Smith P; Martin E; Gauvin FP Soc Sci Med; 2003 Jul; 57(2):239-51. PubMed ID: 12765705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Giving Voice to the Voiceless in Environmental Gene Editing. Kofler N; Grogan CM Hastings Cent Rep; 2021 Nov; 51 Suppl 2():S66-S73. PubMed ID: 34905241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing Facilitator Fidelity to Principles of Public Deliberation: Tutorial. Draucker C; Carrión A; Ott MA; Knopf A JMIR Form Res; 2023 Dec; 7():e51202. PubMed ID: 38090788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Envisioning Complex Futures: Collective Narratives and Reasoning in Deliberations over Gene Editing in the Wild. Wills BC; Gusmano MK; Schlesinger M Hastings Cent Rep; 2021 Nov; 51 Suppl 2():S92-S100. PubMed ID: 34905247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Political Bioethics. Gregg B J Med Philos; 2022 Nov; 47(4):516-529. PubMed ID: 35512122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Deficits of Public Deliberation in U.S. Oversight for Gene Edited Organisms. Kuzma J Hastings Cent Rep; 2021 Nov; 51 Suppl 2():S25-S33. PubMed ID: 34905248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Participatory potential and deliberative function: a debate on broadening the scope of democracy through the health councils]. Bispo Júnior JP; Gerschman S Cien Saude Colet; 2013 Jan; 18(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 23338491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Health technology adoption and the politics of governance in the UK. Milewa T Soc Sci Med; 2006 Dec; 63(12):3102-12. PubMed ID: 16982120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does Gene Editing in the Wild Require Broad Public Deliberation? Kaebnick GE Hastings Cent Rep; 2021 Nov; 51 Suppl 2():S34-S41. PubMed ID: 34905251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influencing health policy through public deliberation: Lessons learned from two decades of Citizens'/community juries. Degeling C; Rychetnik L; Street J; Thomas R; Carter SM Soc Sci Med; 2017 Apr; 179():166-171. PubMed ID: 28285232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Narratives in Public Deliberation: Empowering Gene Editing Debate with Storytelling. Chen K; Burgess MM Hastings Cent Rep; 2021 Nov; 51 Suppl 2():S85-S91. PubMed ID: 34905243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Promises and perils of public deliberation: contrasting two national bioethics commissions on embryonic stem cell research. Cohen CB Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2005 Sep; 15(3):269-88. PubMed ID: 16250108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Blueprint for a deliberative public forum on biobanking policy: were theoretical principles achievable in practice? Molster C; Maxwell S; Youngs L; Kyne G; Hope F; Dawkins H; O'Leary P Health Expect; 2013 Jun; 16(2):211-24. PubMed ID: 21645188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]