These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

508 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34905283)

  • 1. Adequacy evaluation and use of pancreatic adenocarcinoma specimens for next-generation sequencing acquired by endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA and FNB.
    Gan Q; Roy-Chowdhuri S; Duose DY; Stewart JM; Coronel E; Bhutani MS; Lee JH; Weston B; Ge PS; Ross WA; Maitra A
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2022 Apr; 130(4):275-283. PubMed ID: 34905283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliable Detection of Somatic Mutations for Pancreatic Cancer in Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided Fine Needle Aspirates with Next-Generation Sequencing: Implications from a Prospective Cohort Study.
    Habib JR; Zhu Y; Yin L; Javed AA; Ding D; Tenior J; Wright M; Ali SZ; Burkhart RA; Burns W; Wolfgang CL; Shin E; Yu J; He J
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Dec; 25(12):3149-3159. PubMed ID: 34244950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration pancreatic adenocarcinoma samples yield adequate DNA for next-generation sequencing: A cohort analysis.
    Bunduc S; Varzaru B; Iacob RA; Sorop A; Manea I; Spiridon A; Chelaru R; Croitoru AE; Becheanu G; Dumbrava M; Dima S; Popescu I; Gheorghe C
    World J Gastroenterol; 2023 May; 29(18):2864-2874. PubMed ID: 37274073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration for genomic profiling and DNA yield in pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
    Kandel P; Nassar A; Gomez V; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Crook JE; Fares NS; Wallace MB
    Endoscopy; 2021 Apr; 53(4):376-382. PubMed ID: 32767288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition by EUS-FNA versus EUS-FNB for solid pancreatic mass without ROSE: a retrospective study.
    Wong T; Pattarapuntakul T; Netinatsunton N; Ovartlarnporn B; Sottisuporn J; Chamroonkul N; Sripongpun P; Jandee S; Kaewdech A; Attasaranya S; Piratvisuth T
    World J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jun; 20(1):215. PubMed ID: 35751053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy Versus Aspiration for Tissue Sampling Adequacy for Molecular Testing in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.
    Mohamed WT; Jahagirdar V; Jaber F; Ahmed MK; Fatima I; Bierman T; Fu Z; Jones PG; Hassan AF; Faber E; Clarkston WK; Ghoz H; Tawfik OW; Jonnalagadda S
    Cancers (Basel); 2024 Feb; 16(4):. PubMed ID: 38398152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition for Successful Next-Generation Sequencing in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.
    Park JK; Lee JH; Noh DH; Park JK; Lee KT; Lee JK; Lee KH; Jang KT; Cho J
    Gut Liver; 2020 May; 14(3):387-394. PubMed ID: 31581388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (EUS-FNA) versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in Pancreatic and Non-Pancreatic Lesions.
    Yousri M; Abusinna E; Tahoun N; Okasha HH; El-Habashi AH
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Jun; 23(6):2151-2158. PubMed ID: 35763660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
    Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Echoendoscopic ultrasound pancreatic adenocarcinoma diagnosis and theranostic approach: should
    Béchade D; Palmieri LJ; Bonhomme B; Pernot S; Léna J; Fonck M; Pesqué S; Boillet G; Italiano A; Roseau G
    Therap Adv Gastroenterol; 2024; 17():17562848231224943. PubMed ID: 38250014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comprehensive molecular profiling of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in FNA, biopsy, and resection specimens.
    Razzano D; Bouza SJ; Hernandez PV; Wang M; Robert ME; Walther Z; Cai G
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2022 Sep; 130(9):726-734. PubMed ID: 35511415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition with or without rapid on-site evaluation for solid pancreatic lesions: five years of experience from a single center.
    Liu Y; Xiong D; Zhao Y; Meng Z; Wu X; Jiang Q; Wang Q; Wu D; Zhang S; Feng Y; Yang A
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2023; 58(10):1185-1193. PubMed ID: 37114616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
    Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
    Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. EUS-guided reverse bevel fine-needle biopsy sampling and open tip fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions - a prospective, comparative study.
    Hedenström P; Demir A; Khodakaram K; Nilsson O; Sadik R
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb; 53(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 29301477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In memoriam: Fine-needle aspiration, birth: Fine-needle biopsy: The changing trend in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition.
    Bang JY; Kirtane S; Krall K; Navaneethan U; Hasan M; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
    Dig Endosc; 2019 Mar; 31(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 30256458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy for Next-Generation Sequencing of Pancreatic Exocrine Malignancies.
    Larson BK; Tuli R; Jamil LH; Lo SK; Deng N; Hendifar AE
    Pancreas; 2018 Sep; 47(8):990-995. PubMed ID: 30028448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Targeted next generation sequencing of endoscopic ultrasound acquired cytology from ampullary and pancreatic adenocarcinoma has the potential to aid patient stratification for optimal therapy selection.
    Gleeson FC; Kerr SE; Kipp BR; Voss JS; Minot DM; Tu ZJ; Henry MR; Graham RP; Vasmatzis G; Cheville JC; Lazaridis KN; Levy MJ
    Oncotarget; 2016 Aug; 7(34):54526-54536. PubMed ID: 27203738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of EUS-guided FNB using a Franseen needle for tissue acquisition and microsatellite instability evaluation in unresectable pancreatic lesions.
    Sugimoto M; Irie H; Takagi T; Suzuki R; Konno N; Asama H; Sato Y; Nakamura J; Takasumi M; Hashimoto M; Kato T; Kobashi R; Kobayashi Y; Hashimoto Y; Hikichi T; Ohira H
    BMC Cancer; 2020 Nov; 20(1):1094. PubMed ID: 33176750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy alone vs. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid onsite evaluation in pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial.
    Chen YI; Chatterjee A; Berger R; Kanber Y; Wyse J; Lam E; Gan I; Auger M; Kenshil S; Telford J; Donnellan F; Quinlan J; Lutzak G; Alshamsi F; Parent J; Waschke K; Alghamdi A; Barkun J; Metrakos P; Chaudhury P; Martel M; Dorreen A; Candido K; Miller C; Adam V; Barkun A; Zogopoulos G; Wong C
    Endoscopy; 2022 Jan; 54(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 33506455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study.
    Tian L; Tang AL; Zhang L; Liu XW; Li JB; Wang F; Shen SR; Wang XY
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3533-3539. PubMed ID: 29404729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.