These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3490529)
21. Abortion: the father's rights. Gilbert RA Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1973; 42(3):441-67. PubMed ID: 11664234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The adolescent's right to confidential care when considering abortion. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Adolescence. Pediatrics; 1996 May; 97(5):746-51. PubMed ID: 8628623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The impact of medical technology on the pregnant woman's right to privacy. Annas GJ Am J Law Med; 1987; 13(2-3):213-32. PubMed ID: 3333216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Rationalizing the abortion debate: legal rhetoric and the abortion controversy. Chemerinsky E Buffalo Law Rev; 1982; 31(1):107-64. PubMed ID: 11655711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Inside the womb: interpreting the Ferguson case. Weyrauch S Duke J Gend Law Policy; 2002; 9():81-90. PubMed ID: 14986666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. A child's right to health care. Picard E Dimens Health Serv; 1979 May; 56(5):60-1. PubMed ID: 446952 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Legal aspects of medical genetics in Wisconsin. Clayton EW Wis Med J; 1985 Mar; 84(3):28-32. PubMed ID: 3993069 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Grounded in the reality of their lives: listening to teens who make the abortion decision without involving their parents. Ehrlich JS Berkeley Womens Law J; 2003; 18():61-180. PubMed ID: 15156878 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Supreme Court upholds right of mature minor to obtain abortion without parental consent. Fam Plann Perspect; 1979; 11(4):252-3. PubMed ID: 477929 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [The legal position of the obstetrician in relation to the pregnant patient, the father and the child as well as the expert witness]. Hiersche HD; Hiersche F Gynakologe; 1989 Dec; 22(6):384-9. PubMed ID: 2696704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. How technology is reframing the abortion debate. Callahan D Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Feb; 16(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 3514547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Roe v. Wade reaffirmed. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Aug; 13(4):21-2. PubMed ID: 6629744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Bioethical consideration of maternal-fetal issues. Post LF Fordham Urban Law J; 1997; 24(4):757-75. PubMed ID: 12455510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Key court cases. Where are they now? Cushing M Am J Nurs; 1984 Dec; 84(12):1469-70. PubMed ID: 6568793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Risks of consent. Whomes S Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(4):40. PubMed ID: 2211087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Caution in foregoing patient education]. Fenger H; Klotz S; Hoffmeier A Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2005 Dec; 130(50):2910-1. PubMed ID: 16342017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Mothers and doctors' orders: unmasking the doctor's fiduciary role in maternal-fetal conflicts. Oberman M Northwest Univ Law Rev; 2000; 94(2):451-501. PubMed ID: 12455556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]