BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34905747)

  • 1. Quality and readability of online health information on menopausal hormone therapy in Canada: what are our patients reading?
    Murtaza F; Shirreff L; Huang LN; Jacobson M; Jarcevic R; Christakis MK
    Menopause; 2021 Dec; 29(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 34905747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
    Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality and Readability of Web-based Arabic Health Information on Denture Hygiene: An Infodemiology Study.
    Alhajj MN; Mashyakhy M; Ariffin Z; Ab-Ghani Z; Johari Y; Salim NS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Sep; 21(9):956-960. PubMed ID: 33568578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS).
    Erkin Y; Hanci V; Ozduran E
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Apr; 102(16):e33529. PubMed ID: 37083809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
    Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality and Reliability of Publicly Accessible Information on Laser Treatments for Urinary Incontinence: What Is Available to Our Patients?
    Perruzza D; Jolliffe C; Butti A; McCaffrey C; Kung R; Gagnon L; Lee P
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(7):1524-1530. PubMed ID: 31927043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Quality of Online Information on Glaucoma.
    Shah R; Mahajan J; Oydanich M; Khouri AS
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023; 6(1):93-99. PubMed ID: 35940574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How readable and quality are online patient education materials about Helicobacter pylori?: Assessment of the readability, quality and reliability.
    Yilmaz Hanci S
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Oct; 102(43):e35543. PubMed ID: 37904459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Readability and Quality of Web-Based Patient Information on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Quantitative Content Analysis.
    Tan DJY; Ko TK; Fan KS
    JMIR Form Res; 2023 Nov; 7():e47762. PubMed ID: 38010802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A critical appraisal of web-based information on shoulder pain comparing biomedical vs. psychosocial information.
    Barrett DR; Boone JD; Butch JO; Cavender JA; Sole G; Wassinger CA
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Jan; 32(1):e23-e32. PubMed ID: 36108880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. IVC filter - assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.
    Ko TK; Yun Tan DJ; Hadeed S
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2024 Mar; 12(2):101695. PubMed ID: 37898304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality and readability of web-based Arabic health information on COVID-19: an infodemiological study.
    Halboub E; Al-Ak'hali MS; Al-Mekhlafi HM; Alhajj MN
    BMC Public Health; 2021 Jan; 21(1):151. PubMed ID: 33461516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of the Readability and Quality of Online Information for Patients and Their Families Regarding Schizophrenia.
    Ekinci O; Koyuncu AN
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2024 May; 212(5):278-283. PubMed ID: 38416420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of the Arabic patient-centered online information about orthodontic pain: A quality and readability assessment.
    Alassaf MS; Hamadallah HH; Almuzaini A; Aloufi AM; Al-Turki KN; Khoshhal AS; Alsulaimani MA; Eshky R
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0303308. PubMed ID: 38781283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Web-Based Health Information Following the Renewal of the Cervical Screening Program in Australia: Evaluation of Readability, Understandability, and Credibility.
    Mac OA; Thayre A; Tan S; Dodd RH
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jun; 22(6):e16701. PubMed ID: 32442134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Glioblastoma: assessment of the readability and reliability of online information.
    Ahmadi O; Louw J; Leinonen H; Gan PYC
    Br J Neurosurg; 2021 Oct; 35(5):551-554. PubMed ID: 33769170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Online information for incisional hernia repair: What are patients reading?
    Rouhi AD; Ghanem YK; Bader E; Hoeltzel GD; Joshi ART; Williams NN; Dumon KR
    Surgeon; 2023 Aug; 21(4):e195-e200. PubMed ID: 36588086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Online Patient Information for Hysterectomies: A Systematic Environmental Scan of Quality and Readability.
    Jain M; Chkipov P; Stacey D; Posner G; Bacal V; Chen I
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2022 Aug; 44(8):870-876. PubMed ID: 35487458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online information on Behçet's disease.
    Özduran E; Hanci V
    Reumatismo; 2022 Sep; 74(2):. PubMed ID: 36101989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Readability and Quality of Online Health Information Regarding Parathyroidectomy.
    Byrne J; Keogh S; Cullinane C; Razzaq Z; Redmond HP
    OTO Open; 2022; 6(4):2473974X221133308. PubMed ID: 36311181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.