160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34905924)
1. Ecotoxicological QSTR and QSTTR Modeling for the Prediction of Acute Oral Toxicity of Pesticides against Multiple Avian Species.
Mukherjee RK; Kumar V; Roy K
Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Jan; 56(1):335-348. PubMed ID: 34905924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictive classification-based QSTR models for toxicity study of diverse pesticides on multiple avian species.
Banjare P; Singh J; Roy PP
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Apr; 28(14):17992-18003. PubMed ID: 33410022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predicting Toxicities of Diverse Chemical Pesticides in Multiple Avian Species Using Tree-Based QSAR Approaches for Regulatory Purposes.
Basant N; Gupta S; Singh KP
J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jul; 55(7):1337-48. PubMed ID: 26158470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Chemometric modeling of aquatic toxicity of contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) in Dugesia japonica and its interspecies correlation with daphnia and fish: QSTR and QSTTR approaches.
Hossain KA; Roy K
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2018 Dec; 166():92-101. PubMed ID: 30253287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ecotoxicological Modeling, Ranking and Prioritization of Pharmaceuticals Using QSTR and i-QSTTR Approaches: Application of 2D and Fragment Based Descriptors.
Khan K; Kar S; Sanderson H; Roy K; Leszczynski J
Mol Inform; 2019 Aug; 38(8-9):e1800078. PubMed ID: 30474352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting aquatic toxicities of chemical pesticides in multiple test species using nonlinear QSTR modeling approaches.
Basant N; Gupta S; Singh KP
Chemosphere; 2015 Nov; 139():246-55. PubMed ID: 26142614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. QSTR modeling for qualitative and quantitative toxicity predictions of diverse chemical pesticides in honey bee for regulatory purposes.
Singh KP; Gupta S; Basant N; Mohan D
Chem Res Toxicol; 2014 Sep; 27(9):1504-15. PubMed ID: 25167463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ecotoxicological QSAR modeling of endocrine disruptor chemicals.
Khan K; Roy K; Benfenati E
J Hazard Mater; 2019 May; 369():707-718. PubMed ID: 30831523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Toxicity prediction of 1,2,4-triazoles compounds by QSTR and interspecies QSTTR models.
Liu Z; Dang K; Gao J; Fan P; Li C; Wang H; Li H; Deng X; Gao Y; Qian A
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2022 Sep; 242():113839. PubMed ID: 35816839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. First report on ecotoxicological QSTR and i-QSTR modeling for the prediction of acute ecotoxicity of diverse organic chemicals against three protozoan species.
Kumar A; Kumar V; Podder T; Ojha PK
Chemosphere; 2023 Sep; 335():139066. PubMed ID: 37257655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In silico prediction of chemical toxicity on avian species using chemical category approaches.
Zhang C; Cheng F; Sun L; Zhuang S; Li W; Liu G; Lee PW; Tang Y
Chemosphere; 2015 Mar; 122():280-287. PubMed ID: 25532772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interspecies quantitative structure-toxicity-toxicity (QSTTR) relationship modeling of ionic liquids. Toxicity of ionic liquids to V. fischeri, D. magna and S. vacuolatus.
Das RN; Roy K; Popelier PL
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2015 Dec; 122():497-520. PubMed ID: 26414597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Acute Rat and Mouse Oral Toxicity Determination of Anticholinesterase Inhibitor Carbamate Pesticides: A QSTR Approach.
Roy PP; Banjare P; Verma S; Singh J
Mol Inform; 2019 Aug; 38(8-9):e1800151. PubMed ID: 31066240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exploring QSAR models for assessment of acute fish toxicity of environmental transformation products of pesticides (ETPPs).
Pandey SK; Ojha PK; Roy K
Chemosphere; 2020 Aug; 252():126508. PubMed ID: 32240857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A QSTR model for toxicity prediction of pesticides towards Daphnia magna.
Jia Q; Wang J; Yan F; Wang Q
Chemosphere; 2022 Mar; 291(Pt 2):132980. PubMed ID: 34813852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of acute toxicity of pesticides for Americamysis bahia using linear and nonlinear QSTR modelling approaches.
Diéguez-Santana K; Nachimba-Mayanchi MM; Puris A; Gutiérrez RT; González-Díaz H
Environ Res; 2022 Nov; 214(Pt 3):113984. PubMed ID: 35981614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intelligent consensus predictions of bioconcentration factor of pharmaceuticals using 2D and fragment-based descriptors.
Khan K; Kumar V; Colombo E; Lombardo A; Benfenati E; Roy K
Environ Int; 2022 Dec; 170():107625. PubMed ID: 36375281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prioritization of the ecotoxicological hazard of PAHs towards aquatic species spanning three trophic levels using 2D-QSTR, read-across and machine learning-driven modelling approaches.
Li F; Wang P; Fan T; Zhang N; Zhao L; Zhong R; Sun G
J Hazard Mater; 2024 Mar; 465():133410. PubMed ID: 38185092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting acute contact toxicity of pesticides in honeybees (Apis mellifera) through a k-nearest neighbor model.
Como F; Carnesecchi E; Volani S; Dorne JL; Richardson J; Bassan A; Pavan M; Benfenati E
Chemosphere; 2017 Jan; 166():438-444. PubMed ID: 27705831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. QSAR modeling in ecotoxicological risk assessment: application to the prediction of acute contact toxicity of pesticides on bees (Apis mellifera L.).
Hamadache M; Benkortbi O; Hanini S; Amrane A
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Jan; 25(1):896-907. PubMed ID: 29067614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
