186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34906102)
1. Assessing the quality of deliberative stakeholder consultations involving allied health professionals in pediatric palliative care and hematology/oncology in Canada.
Rahimzadeh V; Longo C; Gagnon J; Fernandez C; Bartlett G
BMC Palliat Care; 2021 Dec; 20(1):189. PubMed ID: 34906102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Communication of Pharmacogenomic test results and treatment plans in pediatric oncology: deliberative stakeholder consultations with parents.
Longo C; Rahimzadeh V; Bartlett G
BMC Palliat Care; 2021 Jan; 20(1):15. PubMed ID: 33435936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing Facilitator Fidelity to Principles of Public Deliberation: Tutorial.
Draucker C; Carrión A; Ott MA; Knopf A
JMIR Form Res; 2023 Dec; 7():e51202. PubMed ID: 38090788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Health professionals' perspectives on breast cancer risk stratification: understanding evaluation of risk versus screening for disease.
Puzhko S; Gagnon J; Simard J; Knoppers BM; Siedlikowski S; Bartlett G
Public Health Rev; 2019; 40():2. PubMed ID: 30858992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Public Deliberation Process on Patient Perspectives on Health Information Sharing: Evaluative Descriptive Study.
Raj M; Ryan K; Nong P; Calhoun K; Trinidad MG; De Vries R; Creary M; Spector-Bagdady K; Kardia SLR; Platt J
JMIR Cancer; 2022 Sep; 8(3):e37793. PubMed ID: 36112409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The ASTUTE Health study protocol: deliberative stakeholder engagements to inform implementation approaches to healthcare disinvestment.
Watt AM; Hiller JE; Braunack-Mayer AJ; Moss JR; Buchan H; Wale J; Riitano DE; Hodgetts K; Street JM; Elshaug AG;
Implement Sci; 2012 Oct; 7():101. PubMed ID: 23088222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Deliberative Public Consultation via Deliberative Polling: Criteria and Methods.
Fishkin JS
Hastings Cent Rep; 2021 Nov; 51 Suppl 2():S19-S24. PubMed ID: 34905249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Addressing ethical challenges at the intersection of pharmacogenomics and primary care using deliberative consultations.
Longo C; Rahimzadeh V; O'Doherty K; Bartlett G
Pharmacogenomics; 2016 Nov; 17(16):1795-1805. PubMed ID: 27767407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An Australian approach to the policy translation of deliberated citizen perspectives on biobanking.
Molster C; Maxwell S; Youngs L; Potts A; Kyne G; Hope F; Dawkins H; O'Leary P
Public Health Genomics; 2012; 15(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 22179074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Protocol: Evaluating the impact of a nation-wide train-the-trainer educational initiative to enhance the quality of palliative care for children with cancer.
Widger K; Friedrichsdorf S; Wolfe J; Liben S; Pole JD; Bouffet E; Greenberg M; Husain A; Siden H; Whitlock JA; Rapoport A
BMC Palliat Care; 2016 Jan; 15():12. PubMed ID: 26818836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Engaging the public on biobanks: outcomes of the BC biobank deliberation.
O'Doherty KC; Burgess MM
Public Health Genomics; 2009; 12(4):203-15. PubMed ID: 19367089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The challenges of ethical deliberation in palliative care settings: A descriptive study.
Dumont S; Turcotte V; Aubin M; Casimiro L; Lavoie M; Picard L
Palliat Support Care; 2022 Apr; 20(2):212-220. PubMed ID: 35574913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stakeholder perspectives towards implementing the national framework on palliative care in Canada.
Xiao J; Brenneis C; Fassbender K
Health Policy; 2022 Jun; 126(6):576-583. PubMed ID: 35120726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk-Stratified Pathways for Cancer Survivorship Care: Insights from a Deliberative Multi-Stakeholder Consultation.
Tremblay D; Touati N; Bilodeau K; Prady C; Usher S; Leblanc Y
Curr Oncol; 2021 Sep; 28(5):3408-3419. PubMed ID: 34590587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Deliberative processes in health technology assessment of medicines: the case of Spain.
Pinilla-Dominguez P; Pinilla-Dominguez J
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2023 Jul; 39(1):e50. PubMed ID: 37403252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of public deliberation methods for gathering input on issues in healthcare: Results from a randomized trial.
Carman KL; Mallery C; Maurer M; Wang G; Garfinkel S; Yang M; Gilmore D; Windham A; Ginsburg M; Sofaer S; Gold M; Pathak-Sen E; Davies T; Siegel J; Mangrum R; Fernandez J; Richmond J; Fishkin J; Siu Chao A
Soc Sci Med; 2015 May; 133():11-20. PubMed ID: 25828260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Blueprint for a deliberative public forum on biobanking policy: were theoretical principles achievable in practice?
Molster C; Maxwell S; Youngs L; Kyne G; Hope F; Dawkins H; O'Leary P
Health Expect; 2013 Jun; 16(2):211-24. PubMed ID: 21645188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Testing a deliberative democracy method with citizens of African ancestry to weigh pros and cons of targeted screening for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk.
Guan Y; Pathak S; Ballard D; Veluswamy JK; McCullough LE; McBride CM; Gornick MC
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():984926. PubMed ID: 36424974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the quality of democratic deliberation: a case study of public deliberation on the ethics of surrogate consent for research.
De Vries R; Stanczyk A; Wall IF; Uhlmann R; Damschroder LJ; Kim SY
Soc Sci Med; 2010 Jun; 70(12):1896-1903. PubMed ID: 20378225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
