These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34906477)

  • 21. Development of a consent resource for genomic data sharing in the clinical setting.
    Riggs ER; Azzariti DR; Niehaus A; Goehringer SR; Ramos EM; Rodriguez LL; Knoppers B; Rehm HL; Martin CL;
    Genet Med; 2019 Jan; 21(1):81-88. PubMed ID: 29899502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. "A Question of Trust" and "a Leap of Faith"-Study Participants' Perspectives on Consent, Privacy, and Trust in Smart Home Research: Qualitative Study.
    Kennedy MR; Huxtable R; Birchley G; Ives J; Craddock I
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Nov; 9(11):e25227. PubMed ID: 34842551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Research participants' perceptions and views on consent for biobank research: a review of empirical data and ethical analysis.
    D'Abramo F; Schildmann J; Vollmann J
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Sep; 16():60. PubMed ID: 26354520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Biobanking for Genomic and Personalized Health Research: Participant Perceptions and Preferences.
    Barnes R; Votova K; Rahimzadeh V; Osman N; Penn AM; Zawati MH; Knoppers BM
    Biopreserv Biobank; 2020 Jun; 18(3):204-212. PubMed ID: 32302503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Ethical concerns on sharing genomic data including patients' family members.
    Takashima K; Maru Y; Mori S; Mano H; Noda T; Muto K
    BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Jun; 19(1):61. PubMed ID: 29914459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Qualitative Data Sharing: Participant Understanding, Motivation, and Consent.
    VandeVusse A; Mueller J; Karcher S
    Qual Health Res; 2022 Jan; 32(1):182-191. PubMed ID: 34847803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Obtaining informed consent for clinical tumor and germline exome sequencing of newly diagnosed childhood cancer patients.
    Scollon S; Bergstrom K; Kerstein RA; Wang T; Hilsenbeck SG; Ramamurthy U; Gibbs RA; Eng CM; Chintagumpala MM; Berg SL; McCullough LB; McGuire AL; Plon SE; Parsons DW
    Genome Med; 2014; 6(9):69. PubMed ID: 25317207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Should Feedback of Individual Results be Integrated into the Consent Process in African Genomics? Participants' Views from an HIV-TB Genomics Research Project in Botswana.
    Ralefala D; Kasule M; Wonkam A; Matshaba M; de Vries J
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2022; 13(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 34197280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Exploring the Role of Shared Decision Making in the Consent Process for Pediatric Genomics Research in Cameroon, Tanzania, and Ghana.
    Bukini D; deVries J; Treadwell M; Anie K; Dennis-Antwi J; Kamga KK; McCurdy S; Ohene-Frempong K; Makani J; Wonkam A
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2019; 10(3):182-189. PubMed ID: 31379268
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ethical frameworks for obtaining informed consent in tumour profiling: an evidence-based case for Singapore.
    Bylstra Y; Lysaght T; Thrivikraman J; Watson S; Tan P
    Hum Genomics; 2017 Dec; 11(1):31. PubMed ID: 29221462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Conducting a large, multi-site survey about patients' views on broad consent: challenges and solutions.
    Smith ME; Sanderson SC; Brothers KB; Myers MF; McCormick J; Aufox S; Shrubsole MJ; Garrison NA; Mercaldo ND; Schildcrout JS; Clayton EW; Antommaria AH; Basford M; Brilliant M; Connolly JJ; Fullerton SM; Horowitz CR; Jarvik GP; Kaufman D; Kitchner T; Li R; Ludman EJ; McCarty C; McManus V; Stallings S; Williams JL; Holm IA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):162. PubMed ID: 27881091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Key Implications of Data Sharing in Pediatric Genomics.
    Rahimzadeh V; Schickhardt C; Knoppers BM; Sénécal K; Vears DF; Fernandez CV; Pfister S; Plon S; Terry S; Williams J; Williams MS; Cornel M; Friedman JM
    JAMA Pediatr; 2018 May; 172(5):476-481. PubMed ID: 29554172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Understandings of genomic research in developing countries: a qualitative study of the views of MalariaGEN participants in Mali.
    Traore K; Bull S; Niare A; Konate S; Thera MA; Kwiatkowski D; Parker M; Doumbo OK
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Jun; 16():42. PubMed ID: 26077875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Young people's views about consenting to data linkage: findings from the PEARL qualitative study.
    Audrey S; Brown L; Campbell R; Boyd A; Macleod J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Mar; 16():34. PubMed ID: 27001504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Participant Reactions to a Literacy-Focused, Web-Based Informed Consent Approach for a Genomic Implementation Study.
    Kraft SA; Porter KM; Duenas DM; Guerra C; Joseph G; Lee SS; Shipman KJ; Allen J; Eubanks D; Kauffman TL; Lindberg NM; Anderson K; Zepp JM; Gilmore MJ; Mittendorf KF; Shuster E; Muessig KR; Arnold B; Goddard KAB; Wilfond BS
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2021; 12(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 32981477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Exploring the challenges of and solutions to sharing personal genomic data for use in healthcare.
    Parvinen L; Alamäki A; Hallikainen H; Mäki M
    Health Informatics J; 2023; 29(1):14604582231152185. PubMed ID: 36651319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Patient Perspectives on Sharing Anonymized Personal Health Data Using a Digital System for Dynamic Consent and Research Feedback: A Qualitative Study.
    Spencer K; Sanders C; Whitley EA; Lund D; Kaye J; Dixon WG
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Apr; 18(4):e66. PubMed ID: 27083521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The challenge of informed consent and return of results in translational genomics: empirical analysis and recommendations.
    Henderson GE; Wolf SM; Kuczynski KJ; Joffe S; Sharp RR; Parsons DW; Knoppers BM; Yu JH; Appelbaum PS
    J Law Med Ethics; 2014; 42(3):344-55. PubMed ID: 25264092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Informed consent for whole genome sequencing: a qualitative analysis of participant expectations and perceptions of risks, benefits, and harms.
    Tabor HK; Stock J; Brazg T; McMillin MJ; Dent KM; Yu JH; Shendure J; Bamshad MJ
    Am J Med Genet A; 2012 Jun; 158A(6):1310-9. PubMed ID: 22532433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Should Researchers Offer Results to Family Members of Cancer Biobank Participants? A Mixed-Methods Study of Proband and Family Preferences.
    Gordon DR; Radecki Breitkopf C; Robinson M; Petersen WO; Egginton JS; Chaffee KG; Petersen GM; Wolf SM; Koenig BA
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2019; 10(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 30596322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.