158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34906738)
1. Evaluation of quantitative light-induced fluorescence to assess lesion depth in cavitated and non-cavitated root caries lesions - An in vitro study.
Kreher D; Park KJ; Schmalz G; Schulz-Kornas E; Haak R; Ziebolz D
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2022 Mar; 37():102675. PubMed ID: 34906738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laser fluorescence is a predictor of lesion depth in non-cavitated root carious lesions - an in vitro study.
Kreher D; Schmalz G; Haak R; Ziebolz D
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2023 Mar; 41():103243. PubMed ID: 36565731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of non-cavitated root caries lesions by quantitative light-induced fluorescence-An in vivo feasibility study.
Günther E; Park KJ; Meißner T; Kottmann T; Schmalz G; Haak R; Ziebolz D
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2020 Jun; 30():101671. PubMed ID: 31988025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Light-based diagnostic methods for the in vivo assessment of initial caries lesions: Laser fluorescence, QLF and OCT.
Park KJ; Voigt A; Schneider H; Ziebolz D; Haak R
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2021 Jun; 34():102270. PubMed ID: 33785442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vivo detection of non-cavitated caries lesions on occlusal surfaces by visual inspection and quantitative light-induced fluorescence.
Kühnisch J; Ifland S; Tranaeus S; Hickel R; Stösser L; Heinrich-Weltzien R
Acta Odontol Scand; 2007 Jun; 65(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 17514522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Arrest of root caries with an adjuvant chlorhexidine-fluoride varnish over a 12-months observation period: a QLF-analyzed, placebo-controlled, randomized, clinical trial (RCT).
Park KJ; Meißner T; Günther E; Schmalz G; Kottmann T; Krause F; Haak R; Ziebolz D
Odontology; 2022 Jan; 110(1):193-202. PubMed ID: 34255238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The diagnostic efficacy of quantitative light-induced fluorescence in detection of dental caries of primary teeth.
Cho KH; Kang CM; Jung HI; Lee HS; Lee K; Lee TY; Song JS
J Dent; 2021 Dec; 115():103845. PubMed ID: 34637890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of demineralization and remineralization of intact root surface lesions in the clinic by a quantitative light-induced fluorescence system.
Durmusoglu O; Tağtekin DA; Yanikoğlu F
Lasers Med Sci; 2012 Mar; 27(2):397-402. PubMed ID: 21424800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study to quantify demineralized enamel in deciduous and permanent teeth using laser- and light-induced fluorescence techniques.
Ando M; van Der Veen MH; Schemehorn BR; Stookey GK
Caries Res; 2001; 35(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 11799288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of surface defects in early caries assessment using quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) and micro-digital-photography (MDP).
Meharry MR; Dawson D; Wefel JS; Harless JD; Kummet CM; Xiao X
J Dent; 2012 Nov; 40(11):955-61. PubMed ID: 22892465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of a novel in vitro model for non-cavitated carious lesion formation reflecting carious lesion activity.
Kim HE
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2024 Apr; 46():104037. PubMed ID: 38438002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Red fluorescence intensity as a criterion for assessing remineralization efficacy in early carious lesions.
Kim HE
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2024 Feb; 45():103963. PubMed ID: 38184220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monitoring enamel caries on resin-treated occlusal surfaces using quantitative light-induced fluorescence: an in vitro study.
Silva FG; Freitas PM; Mendes FM; de Novaes TF; Diniz MB; Oliveira Guaré R
Lasers Med Sci; 2020 Sep; 35(7):1629-1636. PubMed ID: 32382936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of initial caries lesions on smooth surfaces by quantitative light-induced fluorescence and visual examination: an in vivo comparison.
Heinrich-Weltzien R; Kühnisch J; Ifland S; Tranaeus S; Angmar-Månsson B; Stösser L
Eur J Oral Sci; 2005 Dec; 113(6):494-8. PubMed ID: 16324139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of fluorescence parameters between three generations of QLF devices for detecting enamel caries in vitro and on smooth surfaces.
Park SW; Kim SK; Lee HS; Lee ES; de Josselin de Jong E; Kim BI
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2019 Mar; 25():142-147. PubMed ID: 30508664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tooth caries classification with quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) images using convolutional neural network for permanent teeth in vivo.
Park EY; Jeong S; Kang S; Cho J; Cho JY; Kim EK
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Dec; 23(1):981. PubMed ID: 38066624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of QLF and DIAGNOdent for quantification of smooth surface caries.
Shi XQ; Tranaeus S; Angmar-Månsson B
Caries Res; 2001; 35(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 11125192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Red fluorescence threshold for assessing the lesion activity of early caries.
Lee YR; Kim HE
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2020 Dec; 32():102040. PubMed ID: 33011395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pilot clinical study to assess caries lesion activity using quantitative light-induced fluorescence during dehydration.
Ando M; Ferreira-Zandoná AG; Eckert GJ; Zero DT; Stookey GK
J Biomed Opt; 2017 Mar; 22(3):35005. PubMed ID: 28280839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of dental caries detection with quantitative light-induced fluorescence in comparison to different field of view devices.
Oh SH; Choi JY; Kim SH
Sci Rep; 2022 Apr; 12(1):6139. PubMed ID: 35414687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
