These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3490749)

  • 1. Baseline screening mammography: one vs two views per breast.
    Sickles EA; Weber WN; Galvin HB; Ominsky SH; Sollitto RA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Dec; 147(6):1149-53. PubMed ID: 3490749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Second-screening mammography: one versus two views per breast.
    Ikeda DM; Sickles EA
    Radiology; 1988 Sep; 168(3):651-6. PubMed ID: 3406393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mammography screening: an incremental cost effectiveness analysis of two view versus one view procedures in London.
    Bryan S; Brown J; Warren R
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1995 Feb; 49(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 7707010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: comparison of craniocaudal, mediolateral oblique, and mediolateral views.
    Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
    Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):695-701. PubMed ID: 17114620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Baseline screening mammography with one versus two views.
    Anttinen I; Pamilo M; Roiha M; Soiva M; Suramo I
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):241-3. PubMed ID: 2591390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. UKCCCR multicentre randomised controlled trial of one and two view mammography in breast cancer screening.
    Wald NJ; Murphy P; Major P; Parkes C; Townsend J; Frost C
    BMJ; 1995 Nov; 311(7014):1189-93. PubMed ID: 7488893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Oblique-view mammography: adequacy for screening. Work in progress.
    Muir BB; Kirkpatrick AE; Roberts MM; Duffy SW
    Radiology; 1984 Apr; 151(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 6701330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast thickness in routine mammograms: effect on image quality and radiation dose.
    Helvie MA; Chan HP; Adler DD; Boyd PG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Dec; 163(6):1371-4. PubMed ID: 7992731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mammography for screening high-risk patients for cancer: value of including a lateral projection.
    Kreager JA; Kornguth PJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):295-7. PubMed ID: 8310913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast cancer detection: one versus two views.
    Bassett LW; Bunnell DH; Jahanshahi R; Gold RH; Arndt RD; Linsman J
    Radiology; 1987 Oct; 165(1):95-7. PubMed ID: 3628795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characteristics of breast cancer in an incident cancer population.
    Schmitt EL; Threatt B
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Aug; 143(2):403-6. PubMed ID: 6611076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Mammographic diagnosis based on oblique projection. Personal experience].
    Gozzi G; Vidali C; Polonio G; Cressa C; Sabella M
    Radiol Med; 1988 Apr; 75(4):365-9. PubMed ID: 3375480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mammography screening. One versus two views and independent double reading.
    Thurfjell E
    Acta Radiol; 1994 Jul; 35(4):345-50. PubMed ID: 8011383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Film-screen mammography: comparison of views.
    Bassett LW; Bunnell DH; Gold RH; Jahanshahi R
    J Natl Med Assoc; 1989 Apr; 81(4):391-4. PubMed ID: 2738948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast compression and radiation dose in two different mammographic oblique projections: 45 and 60 degrees.
    Brnić Z; Hebrang A
    Eur J Radiol; 2001 Oct; 40(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 11673002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Number of projections in mammography: influence on detection of breast disease.
    Andersson I; Hildell J; Mühlow A; Pettersson H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Feb; 130(2):349-51. PubMed ID: 414592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficacy of step-oblique mammography for confirmation and localization of densities seen on only one standard mammographic view.
    Pearson KL; Sickles EA; Frankel SD; Leung JW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Mar; 174(3):745-52. PubMed ID: 10701619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficiency of cancer detection during routine repeat (incident) mammographic screening: two versus one view mammography.
    Blanks RG; Given-Wilson RM; Moss SM
    J Med Screen; 1998; 5(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 9795875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An investigation into why two-view mammography is better than one-view in breast cancer screening.
    Hackshaw AK; Wald NJ; Michell MJ; Field S; Wilson AR
    Clin Radiol; 2000 Jun; 55(6):454-8. PubMed ID: 10873691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breast radiography using the oblique projection.
    Bassett LW; Gold RH
    Radiology; 1983 Nov; 149(2):585-7. PubMed ID: 6622708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.