These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34908144)

  • 1. Absolute and Relative Reliability of a Comprehensive Quantitative Sensory Testing Protocol in Women Treated for Breast Cancer.
    Dams L; Haenen V; Van der Gucht E; Devoogdt N; Smeets A; Bernar K; De Vrieze T; De Groef A; Meeus M
    Pain Med; 2022 May; 23(6):1162-1175. PubMed ID: 34908144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability and minimal detectable change of dynamic temporal summation and conditioned pain modulation using a single experimental paradigm.
    Vincenot M; Beaulieu LD; Gendron L; Marchand S; Léonard G
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(7):e0307556. PubMed ID: 39052569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Test-retest agreement and reliability of quantitative sensory testing 1 year after breast cancer surgery.
    Andersen KG; Kehlet H; Aasvang EK
    Clin J Pain; 2015 May; 31(5):393-403. PubMed ID: 25084072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short-term test-retest-reliability of conditioned pain modulation using the cold-heat-pain method in healthy subjects and its correlation to parameters of standardized quantitative sensory testing.
    Gehling J; Mainka T; Vollert J; Pogatzki-Zahn EM; Maier C; Enax-Krumova EK
    BMC Neurol; 2016 Aug; 16():125. PubMed ID: 27495743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The long-term reliability of static and dynamic quantitative sensory testing in healthy individuals.
    Marcuzzi A; Wrigley PJ; Dean CM; Adams R; Hush JM
    Pain; 2017 Jul; 158(7):1217-1223. PubMed ID: 28328574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multifactorial assessment of measurement errors affecting intraoral quantitative sensory testing reliability.
    Moana-Filho EJ; Alonso AA; Kapos FP; Leon-Salazar V; Durand SH; Hodges JS; Nixdorf DR
    Scand J Pain; 2017 Jul; 16():93-98. PubMed ID: 28850419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of the conditioned pain modulation paradigm across three anatomical sites.
    Nuwailati R; Curatolo M; LeResche L; Ramsay DS; Spiekerman C; Drangsholt M
    Scand J Pain; 2020 Apr; 20(2):283-296. PubMed ID: 31812949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative Sensory Testing in Women After Surgery for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.
    Dams L; Van der Gucht E; Meeus M; Devoogdt N; Smeets A; Penen F; De Baerdemaecker T; Haenen V; Bernar K; De Vrieze T; De Groef A
    Clin J Pain; 2021 Jul; 37(7):538-564. PubMed ID: 33883413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of static and dynamic quantitative sensory testing in patients with painful chronic pancreatitis.
    Olesen SS; van Goor H; Bouwense SA; Wilder-Smith OH; Drewes AM
    Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2012; 37(5):530-6. PubMed ID: 22854397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of CPM reliability: quantification of the within-subject reliability of 10 different protocols.
    Vaegter HB; Petersen KK; Mørch CD; Imai Y; Arendt-Nielsen L
    Scand J Pain; 2018 Oct; 18(4):729-737. PubMed ID: 30007061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reproducibility of quantitative sensory testing applied to musculoskeletal orofacial region: Site and sex differences.
    Costa YM; de Araújo-Júnior ENS; Fiedler LS; de Souza PRJ; Silva LLCP; Ferreira DMAO; Conti PCR; Bonjardim LR
    Eur J Pain; 2019 Jan; 23(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 29989267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative sensory testing: a comprehensive protocol for clinical trials.
    Rolke R; Magerl W; Campbell KA; Schalber C; Caspari S; Birklein F; Treede RD
    Eur J Pain; 2006 Jan; 10(1):77-88. PubMed ID: 16291301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability of temporal summation, thermal and pressure pain thresholds in a healthy cohort and musculoskeletal trauma population.
    Middlebrook N; Heneghan NR; Evans DW; Rushton A; Falla D
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233521. PubMed ID: 32469913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Test-retest reliability of quantitative sensory testing for mechanical somatosensory and pain modulation assessment of masticatory structures.
    Costa YM; Morita-Neto O; de Araújo-Júnior EN; Sampaio FA; Conti PC; Bonjardim LR
    J Oral Rehabil; 2017 Mar; 44(3):197-204. PubMed ID: 28008644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of intra-oral quantitative sensory testing (QST) in patients with atypical odontalgia and healthy controls - a multicentre study.
    Baad-Hansen L; Pigg M; Yang G; List T; Svensson P; Drangsholt M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2015 Feb; 42(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 25284726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Test-Retest Instability of Temporal Summation and Conditioned Pain Modulation Measures in Older Adults.
    Naugle KM; Ohlman T; Wind B; Miller L
    Pain Med; 2020 Nov; 21(11):2863-2876. PubMed ID: 33083842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving QST Reliability--More Raters, Tests, or Occasions? A Multivariate Generalizability Study.
    O'Neill S; O'Neill L
    J Pain; 2015 May; 16(5):454-62. PubMed ID: 25683899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Test-retest reliability of thermal quantitative sensory testing on two sites within the L5 dermatome of the lumbar spine and lower extremity.
    Knutti IA; Suter MR; Opsommer E
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Sep; 579():157-62. PubMed ID: 25064700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Concurrent validity of dynamic bedside quantitative sensory testing paradigms in breast cancer survivors with persistent pain.
    Haenen V; Meeus M; Devoogdt N; Morlion B; Dams L; De Groote A; Foubert A; De Groef A
    Scand J Pain; 2024 Jan; 24(1):. PubMed ID: 38498596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The interrater and test-retest reliability of 3 modalities of quantitative sensory testing in healthy adults and people with chronic low back pain or rheumatoid arthritis.
    Brady SM; Georgopoulos V; Veldhuijzen van Zanten JJCS; Duda JL; Metsios GS; Kitas GD; Fenton SAM; Walsh DA; McWilliams DF
    Pain Rep; 2023 Dec; 8(6):e1102. PubMed ID: 37829138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.