These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34908144)
21. Development of a new bed-side-test assessing conditioned pain modulation: a test-retest reliability study. Larsen JB; Madeleine P; Arendt-Nielsen L Scand J Pain; 2019 Jul; 19(3):565-574. PubMed ID: 30920956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Feasibility and reliability of a quantitative sensory testing protocol in youth with acute musculoskeletal pain postsurgery or postinjury. Li R; Holley AL; Palermo TM; Ohls O; Edwards RR; Rabbitts JA Pain; 2023 Jul; 164(7):1627-1638. PubMed ID: 36727891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reliability of Pain Measurements Using Computerized Cuff Algometry: A DoloCuff Reliability and Agreement Study. Kvistgaard Olsen J; Fener DK; Waehrens EE; Wulf Christensen A; Jespersen A; Danneskiold-Samsøe B; Bartels EM Pain Pract; 2017 Jul; 17(6):708-717. PubMed ID: 27611494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Test-retest and interobserver reliability of quantitative sensory testing according to the protocol of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): a multi-centre study. Geber C; Klein T; Azad S; Birklein F; Gierthmühlen J; Huge V; Lauchart M; Nitzsche D; Stengel M; Valet M; Baron R; Maier C; Tölle T; Treede RD Pain; 2011 Mar; 152(3):548-556. PubMed ID: 21237569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Questionnaire-based somatosensory profiling in breast cancer survivors: are we there yet? Associations between questionnaires and quantitative sensory testing. Dams L; Van der Gucht E; Haenen V; Devoogdt N; Smeets A; Morlion B; Bernar K; De Vrieze T; Moloney N; De Groef A; Meeus M Disabil Rehabil; 2023 Jun; 45(11):1865-1876. PubMed ID: 35617510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Reliability of thermal quantitative sensory testing: a systematic review. Moloney NA; Hall TM; Doody CM J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(2):191-207. PubMed ID: 22773522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Reliability of intraoral quantitative sensory testing (QST). Pigg M; Baad-Hansen L; Svensson P; Drangsholt M; List T Pain; 2010 Feb; 148(2):220-226. PubMed ID: 20022428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Continuum of somatosensory profiles in breast cancer survivors with and without pain, compared to healthy controls and patients with fibromyalgia. Haenen V; Dams L; Meeus M; Devoogdt N; Morlion B; De Groote A; De Groef A Eur J Pain; 2024 Aug; 28(7):1226-1241. PubMed ID: 38440910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Do chronic low back pain subgroups derived from dynamic quantitative sensory testing exhibit differing multidimensional profiles? Rabey M; Kendell M; Koren S; Silva I; Watts L; Wong C; Slater H; Smith A; Beales D Scand J Pain; 2021 Jul; 21(3):474-484. PubMed ID: 33639047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. How stable are quantitative sensory testing measurements over time? Report on 10-week reliability and agreement of results in healthy volunteers. Nothnagel H; Puta C; Lehmann T; Baumbach P; Menard MB; Gabriel B; Gabriel HHW; Weiss T; Musial F J Pain Res; 2017; 10():2067-2078. PubMed ID: 28919806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Verbal instructions influence pain thresholds assessment: A study using manual and electronic mechanical stimulators. Suzuki K; Baad-Hansen L; Svensson P Eur J Pain; 2017 May; 21(5):900-906. PubMed ID: 28106324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Development of a Novel Brief Quantitative Sensory Testing Protocol That Integrates Static and Dynamic Pain Assessments: Test-Retest Performance in Healthy Adults. De Vita MJ; Buckheit K; Gilmour CE; Moskal D; Maisto SA Pain Med; 2022 Feb; 23(2):347-351. PubMed ID: 34601615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): reference data for the trunk and application in patients with chronic postherpetic neuralgia. Pfau DB; Krumova EK; Treede RD; Baron R; Toelle T; Birklein F; Eich W; Geber C; Gerhardt A; Weiss T; Magerl W; Maier C Pain; 2014 May; 155(5):1002-1015. PubMed ID: 24525274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Alterations in endogenous pain modulation in endurance athletes: an experimental study using quantitative sensory testing and the cold-pressor task. Tesarz J; Gerhardt A; Schommer K; Treede RD; Eich W Pain; 2013 Jul; 154(7):1022-9. PubMed ID: 23657118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Considerations for multi-centre conditioned pain modulation (CPM) research; an investigation of the inter-rater reliability, level of agreement and confounders for the Achilles tendon and Triceps Surae. Murphy M; Gibson W; Chivers P; Docking S; Rio E Br J Pain; 2021 Feb; 15(1):91-101. PubMed ID: 33633856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Is One Trial Sufficient to Obtain Excellent Pressure Pain Threshold Reliability in the Low Back of Asymptomatic Individuals? A Test-Retest Study. Balaguier R; Madeleine P; Vuillerme N PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160866. PubMed ID: 27513474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Quantitative sensory testing: identifying pain characteristics in patients with osteoarthritis. Arant KR; Katz JN; Neogi T Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2022 Jan; 30(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 34597800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessment of Sensory Thresholds in Dogs using Mechanical and Hot Thermal Quantitative Sensory Testing. Cunningham RM; Park RM; Knazovicky D; Lascelles BDX; Gruen ME J Vis Exp; 2021 Oct; (176):. PubMed ID: 34779443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of pressure pain threshold assessment in stroke patients. Zhang YH; Wang YC; Hu GW; Ding XQ; Shen XH; Yang H; Rong JF; Wang XQ Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2022 Aug; 58(4):549-557. PubMed ID: 35362718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]