BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34908207)

  • 1. Rethinking the significance of surgery for uterine cervical cancer.
    Shimada M; Tsuji K; Shigeta S; Nagai T; Watanabe Z; Tokunaga H; Kigawa J; Yaegashi N
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2022 Mar; 48(3):576-586. PubMed ID: 34908207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Re-classification of uterine cervical cancer cases treated with radical hysterectomy based on the 2018 FIGO staging system.
    Osaku D; Komatsu H; Okawa M; Iida Y; Sato S; Oishi T; Harada T
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 60(6):1054-1058. PubMed ID: 34794737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is the revised 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer more prognostic than the 2009 FIGO staging system for women previously staged as IB disease?
    Ayhan A; Aslan K; Bulut AN; Akilli H; Öz M; Haberal A; Meydanli MM
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Sep; 240():209-214. PubMed ID: 31325847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage IB and IIA cervical cancer with tumor diameter of 3 cm or greater.
    Kong TW; Chang SJ; Lee J; Paek J; Ryu HS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Feb; 24(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 24407571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of Histopathological Risk Factors on the Treatment of Stage IB-IIB Uterine Cervical Cancer.
    Shimada M; Tokunaga H; Kigawa J; Yaegashi N
    Tohoku J Exp Med; 2020 Dec; 252(4):339-351. PubMed ID: 33311005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ovarian metastasis in carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
    Shimada M; Kigawa J; Nishimura R; Yamaguchi S; Kuzuya K; Nakanishi T; Suzuki M; Kita T; Iwasaka T; Terakawa N
    Gynecol Oncol; 2006 May; 101(2):234-7. PubMed ID: 16300819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy without uterine manipulator for cervical cancer stage IB: description of the technique, our experience and results after the era of LACC trial.
    Kavallaris A; Chalvatzas N; Gkoutzioulis A; Zygouris D
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Apr; 303(4):1039-1047. PubMed ID: 33068159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging.
    Levine MD; Brown J; Crane EK; Tait DL; Naumann RW
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):824-828. PubMed ID: 32730990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of the effect of adjuvant radiotherapy on outcomes and complications after radical hysterectomy in FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer patients with intermediate risk factors (GOTIC Study).
    Nakamura K; Kitahara Y; Satoh T; Takei Y; Takano M; Nagao S; Sekiguchi I; Suzuki M
    World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 14(1):173. PubMed ID: 27356862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perioperative morbidity and rate of upstaging after laparoscopic staging for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: results of a prospective randomized trial.
    Köhler C; Mustea A; Marnitz S; Schneider A; Chiantera V; Ulrich U; Scharf JP; Martus P; Vieira MA; Tsunoda A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 213(4):503.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25986030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical principles for managing stage IB2, IIA2, and IIB uterine cervical cancer (Bulky Tumors) in Japan: a survey of the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group.
    Mikami M; Aoki Y; Sakamoto M; Shimada M; Takeshima N; Fujiwara H; Matsumoto T; Kita T; Takizawa K;
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Sep; 24(7):1333-40. PubMed ID: 25078340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Matched-case comparison for the role of surgery in FIGO stage Ib1-IIa squamous cell carcinoma of cervix and suspicious para-aortic lymph node metastasis.
    Kim HS; Park NH; Wu HG; Cho JY; Chung HH; Kim JW; Song YS; Kim SH; Kang SB
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 16(1):133-9. PubMed ID: 18979134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.
    Chen X; Zhao N; Ye P; Chen J; Nan X; Zhao H; Zhou K; Zhang Y; Xue J; Zhou H; Shang H; Zhu H; Leanne VM; Yan X
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):564-571. PubMed ID: 32276941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Trend in proportion and clinicopathological characteristics of young women with stage Ⅰa2 to Ⅱa2 cervical cancer].
    Wang W; Hao M; Chen CL; Liu P; Ling B; Kang S; Lu AW; Wang WL; Zhao WD; Zhu QY; Zhao YY; Zhao HW; Jin SL; Ni Y; Lang JH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Oct; 54(10):666-672. PubMed ID: 31648442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Prognostic factors of stage IB and IIA carcinoma of the cervix treated by surgery].
    Zhang WH; Wu LY; Bai P; Li SM; Zhang R; Li B; Sun JH; Wu AR
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2004 Aug; 26(8):490-2. PubMed ID: 15555341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally invasive surgical management of early-stage cervical cancer: an analysis of the risk factors of surgical complications and of oncologic outcomes.
    Garabedian C; Merlot B; Bresson L; Tresch E; Narducci F; Leblanc E
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 May; 25(4):714-21. PubMed ID: 25647258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651-Gynecologic Oncology Group 183.
    Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Chi DS; Amendola MA; Brandt K; Schwartz LH; Koelliker S; Siegelman ES; Brown JJ; McGhee RB; Iyer R; Vitellas KM; Snyder B; Long HJ; Fiorica JV; Mitchell DG; ;
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 Dec; 23(36):9329-37. PubMed ID: 16361632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Predictive Model for Parametrial Invasion in Patients With FIGO Stage IB Cervical Cancer: Individualized Approach for Primary Treatment.
    Kong TW; Piao X; Chang SJ; Paek J; Lee Y; Lee EJ; Ryu HS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Jan; 26(1):184-91. PubMed ID: 26512782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinicopathologic Factors of Cervical Adenocarcinoma Stages IB to IIB.
    Mabuchi Y; Yahata T; Kobayashi A; Tanizaki Y; Shiro M; Ota N; Yagi S; Minami S; Ino K
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Nov; 25(9):1677-82. PubMed ID: 26495760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radical Hysterectomy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Bulky-Size Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis between the Robotic and Abdominal Approaches.
    Liu CH; Lee YC; Lin JC; Chan IS; Lee NR; Chang WH; Liu WM; Wang PH
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Oct; 16(20):. PubMed ID: 31614465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.