These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Do serologic and synovial tests help diagnose infection in revision hip arthroplasty with metal-on-metal bearings or corrosion? Yi PH; Cross MB; Moric M; Levine BR; Sporer SM; Paprosky WG; Jacobs JJ; Della Valle CJ Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Feb; 473(2):498-505. PubMed ID: 25171935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Serum D-Dimer Test Is Promising for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Timing of Reimplantation. Shahi A; Kheir MM; Tarabichi M; Hosseinzadeh HRS; Tan TL; Parvizi J J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Sep; 99(17):1419-1427. PubMed ID: 28872523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Diagnostic value of albumin/fibrinogen ratio and C-reactive protein/albumin/globulin ratio for periprosthetic joint infection: a retrospective study. Ji W; Liu Z; Lin T PeerJ; 2023; 11():e16662. PubMed ID: 38111666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. C-reactive protein course during the first 5 days after total knee arthroplasty cannot predict early prosthetic joint infection. Windisch C; Brodt S; Roehner E; Matziolis G Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2017 Aug; 137(8):1115-1119. PubMed ID: 28488017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Diagnostic value of next-generation sequencing to detect periprosthetic joint infection. Yin H; Xu D; Wang D BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Mar; 22(1):252. PubMed ID: 33676477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Role of blood markers in predicting the failure of prosthesis removal and antibiotic-loaded bone cement spacer implantation for treatment of periprosthetic joint infection]. Huang JC; Wang QK; Song ZY; Gao ZY; Chen X; Dai ZP; Zheng J; Jin Y Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Aug; 61(8):681-687. PubMed ID: 37400211 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Serum D-dimer as a diagnostic index of PJI and retrospective analysis of etiology in patients with PJI. Hu Q; Fu Y; Tang L Clin Chim Acta; 2020 Jul; 506():67-71. PubMed ID: 32178976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Synovial Fluid Viscosity Test is Promising for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection. Fu J; Ni M; Chai W; Li X; Hao L; Chen J J Arthroplasty; 2019 Jun; 34(6):1197-1200. PubMed ID: 30837099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A Clinical Pilot Study to Evaluate CD64 Expression on Blood Monocytes as an Indicator of Periprosthetic Joint Infection. Qu PF; Li R; Xu C; Chai W; Li H; Fu J; Chen JY J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2020 Sep; 102(17):e99. PubMed ID: 32358410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Acute or chronic periprosthetic joint infection? Using the ESR ∕ CRP ratio to aid in determining the acuity of periprosthetic joint infections. Christopher ZK; McQuivey KS; Deckey DG; Haglin J; Spangehl MJ; Bingham JS J Bone Jt Infect; 2021; 6(6):229-234. PubMed ID: 34159047 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. The relationship of C-reactive protein/interleukin-6 concentrations between serum and synovial fluid in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. Yu BZ; Li R; Li X; Chai W; Zhou YG; Chen JY J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Dec; 16(1):733. PubMed ID: 34930392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Comparison and estimation of different diagnostic methods in detecting the presence of periprosthetic joint infection]. Tang X; Wang Q; Wang H; Wang S; Zhong Q; Li Z; Ke Y; Li R; Li H; Lin J Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Apr; 54(4):251-7. PubMed ID: 27029198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Evaluation of synovial fluid neutrophil CD64 index as a screening biomarker of prosthetic joint infection. Qin L; Hu N; Li X; Chen Y; Wang J; Huang W Bone Joint J; 2020 Apr; 102-B(4):463-469. PubMed ID: 32228083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Serum C-reactive protein relationship in high- versus low-virulence pathogens in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. Unter Ecker N; Suero EM; Gehrke T; Haasper C; Zahar A; Lausmann C; Hawi N; Citak M J Med Microbiol; 2019 Jun; 68(6):910-917. PubMed ID: 31017566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Circulating D-Dimer versus Fibrinogen in the Diagnosis of Peri-Prosthetic Joint Infection: A Meta-Analysis. Zhang Q; Dong J; Zhou D; Liu F Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2021 Mar; 22(2):200-210. PubMed ID: 32345131 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Serum D-lactate, a novel serological biomarker, is promising for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. Chen Y; Wang H; Chen X; Ma H; Zheng J; Cao L BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Mar; 23(1):292. PubMed ID: 35346149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Laboratory-Reported Normal Value Ranges Should Not Be Used to Diagnose Periprosthetic Joint Infection. Forte SA; D'Alonzo JA; Wells Z; Levine B; Sizer S; Deirmengian C Cureus; 2022 Aug; 14(8):e28258. PubMed ID: 36039123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Is D-dimer a reliable biomarker compared to ESR and CRP in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection? Chen X; Li H; Zhu S; Wang Y; Qian W Bone Joint Res; 2020 Oct; 9(10):701-708. PubMed ID: 33399473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Diagnostic Value of Synovial White Blood Cell Count and Serum C-Reactive Protein for Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Knee Arthroplasty. Kim SG; Kim JG; Jang KM; Han SB; Lim HC; Bae JH J Arthroplasty; 2017 Dec; 32(12):3724-3728. PubMed ID: 28800858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]