These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34911154)

  • 1. Conduction system pacing versus biventricular pacing: Reduced repolarization heterogeneity in addition to improved depolarization.
    Gupta A; Pavri BB
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2022 Feb; 33(2):287-295. PubMed ID: 34911154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conduction System Pacing vs Biventricular Pacing in Heart Failure and Wide QRS Patients: LEVEL-AT Trial.
    Pujol-Lopez M; Jiménez-Arjona R; Garre P; Guasch E; Borràs R; Doltra A; Ferró E; García-Ribas C; Niebla M; Carro E; Puente JL; Vázquez-Calvo S; Invers-Rubio E; Roca-Luque I; Castel MÁ; Arbelo E; Sitges M; Brugada J; Tolosana JM; Mont L
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2022 Nov; 8(11):1431-1445. PubMed ID: 36424012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biventricular pacing has an advantage over left ventricular epicardial pacing alone to minimize proarrhythmic perturbation of repolarization.
    Harada M; Osaka T; Yokoyama E; Takemoto Y; Ito A; Kodama I
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 Feb; 17(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 16533252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conduction System Pacing Versus Conventional Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Congenital Heart Disease.
    Moore JP; de Groot NMS; O'Connor M; Cortez D; Su J; Burrows A; Shannon KM; O'Leary ET; Shah M; Khairy P; Atallah J; Wong T; Lloyd MS; Taverne YJHJ; Dubin AM; Nielsen JC; Evertz R; Czosek RJ; Madhavan M; Chang PM; Aydin A; Cano Ó
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2023 Mar; 9(3):385-393. PubMed ID: 36752449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Novel Method for Assessment of His Bundle Pacing Morphology Using Near Field and Far Field Device Electrograms.
    Saini A; Serafini NJ; Campbell S; Waugh WB; Zimberg R; Sheldon TJ; Kron J; Kalahasty G; Padala SK; Trohman R; Shepard RK; Koneru JN; Vijayaraman P; Ellenbogen KA; Sharma PS
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2019 Feb; 12(2):e006878. PubMed ID: 30707036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Depolarization and repolarization dynamics after His-bundle pacing: Comparison with right ventricular pacing and native ventricular conduction.
    Yanagisawa S; Inden Y; Watanabe R; Tsurumi N; Suzuki N; Nakagomi T; Shimojo M; Okajima T; Riku S; Furui K; Suga K; Shibata R; Murohara T
    Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol; 2022 Sep; 27(5):e12991. PubMed ID: 35802829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Left bundle branch area pacing is superior to right ventricular septum pacing concerning depolarization-repolarization reserve.
    Wang J; Liang Y; Wang W; Chen X; Bai J; Chen H; Su Y; Chen R; Ge J
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):313-322. PubMed ID: 31778249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. His-bundle pacing versus cardiac resynchronisation therapy: Effect on ECG parameters of repolarization.
    Sarkar R; Subramanian M; Rangaswamy VV; Saggu DK; Yalagudri S; Chennapragada S; Bhargava K; Narasimhan C
    J Electrocardiol; 2022; 70():45-49. PubMed ID: 34920166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing versus biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and complete left bundle branch block.
    Hua J; Chen Y; Yu J; Xiong Q; Xia Z; Xia Z; Huang Q; Kong Q; Chen H; Zhang Y; Hu J; Li J; Hu J; Chen Q; Hong K
    Heart Vessels; 2022 Jul; 37(7):1162-1174. PubMed ID: 35088204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. His-bundle pacing versus biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients: A crossover design comparison.
    Lustgarten DL; Crespo EM; Arkhipova-Jenkins I; Lobel R; Winget J; Koehler J; Liberman E; Sheldon T
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 Jul; 12(7):1548-57. PubMed ID: 25828601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of methods for delivering cardiac resynchronization therapy: an acute electrical and haemodynamic within-patient comparison of left bundle branch area, His bundle, and biventricular pacing.
    Ali N; Arnold AD; Miyazawa AA; Keene D; Chow JJ; Little I; Peters NS; Kanagaratnam P; Qureshi N; Ng FS; Linton NWF; Lefroy DC; Francis DP; Phang Boon L; Tanner MA; Muthumala A; Shun-Shin MJ; Cole GD; Whinnett ZI
    Europace; 2023 Mar; 25(3):1060-1067. PubMed ID: 36734205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of left ventricular epicardial and biventricular pacing on ventricular repolarization in normal-heart individuals and patients with congestive heart failure.
    Bai R; Yang XY; Song Y; Lin L; Lü JG; Ching CK; Pu J; Kam R; Hsu LF; Zhang CT; Teo WS; Wang L
    Europace; 2006 Nov; 8(11):1002-10. PubMed ID: 17043073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Network meta-analysis of His bundle, biventricular, or right ventricular pacing as a primary strategy for advanced atrioventricular conduction disease with normal or mildly reduced ejection fraction.
    Fernandes GC; Knijnik L; Lopez J; Rivera M; Fernandes A; Lambrakos LK; Myerburg RJ; Mitrani RD; Goldberger JJ
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 Jun; 31(6):1482-1492. PubMed ID: 32275339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conduction system pacing: promoting the physiology to prevent heart failure.
    Tun HN; Khan H; Chernikova D; Mareev Y; Chakrabarti S; Thant M; Cannata A
    Heart Fail Rev; 2023 Mar; 28(2):379-386. PubMed ID: 36781809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical outcomes of conduction system pacing compared to biventricular pacing in patients requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Vijayaraman P; Zalavadia D; Haseeb A; Dye C; Madan N; Skeete JR; Vipparthy SC; Young W; Ravi V; Rajakumar C; Pokharel P; Larsen T; Huang HD; Storm RH; Oren JW; Batul SA; Trohman RG; Subzposh FA; Sharma PS
    Heart Rhythm; 2022 Aug; 19(8):1263-1271. PubMed ID: 35500791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sequential His bundle and left ventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization.
    Deshmukh A; Sattur S; Bechtol T; Heckman LIB; Prinzen FW; Deshmukh P
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 Sep; 31(9):2448-2454. PubMed ID: 32666630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrical and mechanical components of dyssynchrony in heart failure patients with normal QRS duration and left bundle-branch block: impact of left and biventricular pacing.
    Turner MS; Bleasdale RA; Vinereanu D; Mumford CE; Paul V; Fraser AG; Frenneaux MP
    Circulation; 2004 Jun; 109(21):2544-9. PubMed ID: 15148267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Permanent His bundle pacing: Electrophysiological and echocardiographic observations from long-term follow-up.
    Vijayaraman P; Dandamudi G; Lustgarten D; Ellenbogen KA
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Jul; 40(7):883-891. PubMed ID: 28569391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of scar and His-Purkinje and myocardium conduction on response to conduction system pacing.
    Strocchi M; Gillette K; Neic A; Elliott MK; Wijesuriya N; Mehta V; Vigmond EJ; Plank G; Rinaldi CA; Niederer SA
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2023 Apr; 34(4):984-993. PubMed ID: 36738149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. His-Optimized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy to Maximize Electrical Resynchronization: A Feasibility Study.
    Vijayaraman P; Herweg B; Ellenbogen KA; Gajek J
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2019 Feb; 12(2):e006934. PubMed ID: 30681348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.