203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34911180)
21. Stroke volume variation fail to predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy with one-lung ventilation using thoracotomy.
Fu Q; Zhao F; Mi W; Zhang H
Biosci Trends; 2014 Feb; 8(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 24647114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Stroke volume variation and pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness during resection of primary retroperitoneal tumors in Hans Chinese.
Fu Q; Mi WD; Zhang H
Biosci Trends; 2012 Feb; 6(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 22426102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Uncalibrated pulse contour-derived stroke volume variation predicts fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing liver transplantation.
Biais M; Nouette-Gaulain K; Cottenceau V; Revel P; Sztark F
Br J Anaesth; 2008 Dec; 101(6):761-8. PubMed ID: 18852114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: comparing stroke volume variation by FloTrac/Vigileo and automated pulse pressure variation.
Khwannimit B; Bhurayanontachai R
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2012 Feb; 29(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 21946822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Variation of left ventricular outflow tract velocity and global end-diastolic volume index reliably predict fluid responsiveness in cardiac surgery patients.
Broch O; Renner J; Gruenewald M; Meybohm P; Höcker J; Schöttler J; Steinfath M; Bein B
J Crit Care; 2012 Jun; 27(3):325.e7-13. PubMed ID: 21855280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Influence of increased intra-abdominal pressure on fluid responsiveness predicted by pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in a porcine model.
Renner J; Gruenewald M; Quaden R; Hanss R; Meybohm P; Steinfath M; Scholz J; Bein B
Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):650-8. PubMed ID: 19114894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Stroke volume variation (SVV) and pulse pressure variation (PPV) as indicators of fluid responsiveness in sevoflurane anesthetized mechanically ventilated euvolemic dogs.
Endo Y; Tamura J; Ishizuka T; Itami T; Hanazono K; Miyoshi K; Sano T; Yamashita K; Muir WW
J Vet Med Sci; 2017 Aug; 79(8):1437-1445. PubMed ID: 28690287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Positive end-expiratory pressure-induced increase in external jugular venous pressure does not predict fluid responsiveness in laparoscopic prostatectomy.
Hur M; Yoo S; Choi JY; Park SK; Jung DE; Kim WH; Kim JT; Bahk JH
J Anesth; 2018 Jun; 32(3):316-325. PubMed ID: 29488025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Respiratory variation in the internal jugular vein does not predict fluid responsiveness in the prone position during adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: a prospective cohort study.
Wu M; Dai Z; Liang Y; Liu X; Zheng X; Zhang W; Bo J
BMC Anesthesiol; 2023 Nov; 23(1):360. PubMed ID: 37932674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Stroke volume variation and dynamic arterial elastance predict fluid responsiveness even in thoracoscopic esophagectomy: a prospective observational study.
Hikasa Y; Suzuki S; Tanabe S; Noma K; Shirakawa Y; Fujiwara T; Morimatsu H
J Anesth; 2023 Dec; 37(6):930-937. PubMed ID: 37731141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The influence of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation.
Jun IJ; Chung MH; Kim JE; Lee HS; Son JM; Choi EM
Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(12):2589-2598. PubMed ID: 34104090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Predicting stroke volume and arterial pressure fluid responsiveness in liver cirrhosis patients using dynamic preload variables: A prospective study of diagnostic accuracy.
Wu CY; Cheng YJ; Liu YJ; Wu TT; Chien CT; Chan KC;
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2016 Sep; 33(9):645-52. PubMed ID: 27167058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Non-invasive measurements of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in anesthetized patients using the Nexfin blood pressure monitor.
Stens J; Oeben J; Van Dusseldorp AA; Boer C
J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26318314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Predictive values of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation for fluid responsiveness in patients with pneumoperitoneum.
Zlicar M; Novak-Jankovic V; Blagus R; Cecconi M
J Clin Monit Comput; 2018 Oct; 32(5):825-832. PubMed ID: 29149433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of stroke volume variation and pulse pressure variation as predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing protective one-lung ventilation.
Fu Q; Duan M; Zhao F; Mi W
Drug Discov Ther; 2015 Aug; 9(4):296-302. PubMed ID: 26370528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The comparison of stroke volume variation with central venous pressure in predicting fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure.
Angappan S; Parida S; Vasudevan A; Badhe AS
Indian J Crit Care Med; 2015 Jul; 19(7):394-400. PubMed ID: 26180432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Reliability of pulse pressure and stroke volume variation in assessing fluid responsiveness in the operating room: a metanalysis and a metaregression.
Messina A; Caporale M; Calabrò L; Lionetti G; Bono D; Matronola GM; Brunati A; Frassanito L; Morenghi E; Antonelli M; Chew MS; Cecconi M
Crit Care; 2023 Nov; 27(1):431. PubMed ID: 37940953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prediction of fluid responsiveness by dynamic preload parameters in children undergoing thoracoscopic surgery with one-lung ventilation - A prospective observational study.
Xie S; Han D; Chen G; Pan S
Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Dec; 101(49):e31795. PubMed ID: 36626414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Central venous pressure as an adjunct to flow-guided volume optimisation after induction of general anaesthesia.
Hahn RG; He R; Li Y
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther; 2016; 48(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 26499516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Noninvasive pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness at multiple thresholds: a prospective observational study.
Vos JJ; Poterman M; Salm PP; Van Amsterdam K; Struys MM; Scheeren TW; Kalmar AF
Can J Anaesth; 2015 Nov; 62(11):1153-60. PubMed ID: 26335905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
