BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34911639)

  • 21. Gender bias in resident evaluations: Natural language processing and competency evaluation.
    Andrews J; Chartash D; Hay S
    Med Educ; 2021 Dec; 55(12):1383-1387. PubMed ID: 34224606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How do Trainers and Trainees use Formative Workplace-based Assessments of Operative Competence to Deliver and Receive Structured Feedback?
    Toale C; Nally DM; Ryan DM; Morris M; Kavanagh DO
    J Surg Educ; 2022; 79(2):485-491. PubMed ID: 34593328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Core principles of assessment in competency-based medical education.
    Lockyer J; Carraccio C; Chan MK; Hart D; Smee S; Touchie C; Holmboe ES; Frank JR;
    Med Teach; 2017 Jun; 39(6):609-616. PubMed ID: 28598746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Operative Self-Confidence, Hesitation, and Ability Assessment of Surgical Trainees in Rural Kenya.
    Parker RK; Oloo M; Mogambi FC; White RE; Parker AS
    J Surg Res; 2021 Feb; 258():137-144. PubMed ID: 33010559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Examining gender bias in the feedback shared with family medicine residents.
    Loeppky C; Babenko O; Ross S
    Educ Prim Care; 2017 Nov; 28(6):319-324. PubMed ID: 28812957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Assessment Rationale of Postgraduate Medical Trainees With Incongruent Self and Faculty Assigned Entrustment Scores.
    Zadeh M; Braund H; Chaplin T
    Cureus; 2021 Jul; 13(7):e16666. PubMed ID: 34458051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How can positive and negative trainer feedback in the operating theatre impact a surgical trainee's confidence and well-being: a qualitative study in the north of England.
    Kamali D; Illing J
    BMJ Open; 2018 Feb; 8(2):e017935. PubMed ID: 29440141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hot Seat Diagnosis.
    Han R; Keith J; Slodkowska E; Nofech-Mozes S; Djordjevic B; Parra-Herran C; Shachar S; Mirkovic J; Sherman C; Hsieh E; Ismiil N; Lu FI
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2022 Jan; 146(1):123-131. PubMed ID: 34133708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Survey of Perceptions of Surgical Trainees on Feedback During Training in West Africa.
    Nasir AA; Ameh EA; Ojo EO
    World J Surg; 2020 Aug; 44(8):2542-2549. PubMed ID: 32318791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Improving Narrative Feedback for Resident-Led Academic Rounds: The Effects of Assessment Form Design Changes.
    Courtis S; Rachul C; Fotti S; Fleisher W
    J Grad Med Educ; 2023 Apr; 15(2):257-260. PubMed ID: 37139201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Understanding Surgical Resident and Fellow Perspectives on Their Operative Performance Feedback Needs: A Qualitative Study.
    Bello RJ; Sarmiento S; Meyer ML; Rosson GD; Cooney DS; Lifchez SD; Cooney CM
    J Surg Educ; 2018 Nov; 75(6):1498-1503. PubMed ID: 29685786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Repaying in Kind: Examination of the Reciprocity Effect in Faculty and Resident Evaluations.
    Gardner AK; Scott DJ
    J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(6):e91-e94. PubMed ID: 27211878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Factors influencing the rating of sonographer students' clinical performance.
    Bowman A; Harreveld RB; Lawson C
    Radiography (Lond); 2022 Feb; 28(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 34332858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Exploring the value of structured narrative feedback within the Serious Illness Conversation-Evaluation Exercise (SIC-Ex): a qualitative analysis.
    Ko J; Roze des Ordons A; Ballard M; Shenkier T; Simon JE; Fyles G; Lefresne S; Hawley P; Chen C; McKenzie M; Sanders J; Bernacki R
    BMJ Open; 2024 Jan; 14(1):e078385. PubMed ID: 38286701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessors' and trainees' perceptions of workplace-based assessments in histopathology.
    Brierley DJ; Farthing PM; Zijlstra-Shaw S
    J Clin Pathol; 2018 Dec; 71(12):1100-1107. PubMed ID: 30196274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mixed Messages or Miscommunication? Investigating the Relationship Between Assessors' Workplace-Based Assessment Scores and Written Comments.
    Sebok-Syer SS; Klinger DA; Sherbino J; Chan TM
    Acad Med; 2017 Dec; 92(12):1774-1779. PubMed ID: 28562452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Quality of Assessment of Learning (Qual) Score: Validity Evidence for a Scoring System Aimed at Rating Short, Workplace-Based Comments on Trainee Performance.
    Chan TM; Sebok-Syer SS; Sampson C; Monteiro S
    Teach Learn Med; 2020; 32(3):319-329. PubMed ID: 32013584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Operative Autonomy in a Gender-Balanced Cohort of Surgical Trainees.
    Parr JM; van der Werf B; Locke M
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Dec; 152(6):1367-1374. PubMed ID: 36917746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of rating scales on scores given to junior doctors in multi-source feedback.
    Hassell A; Bullock A; Whitehouse A; Wood L; Jones P; Wall D
    Postgrad Med J; 2012 Jan; 88(1035):10-4. PubMed ID: 22052883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Striving to thrive or striving to survive: Professional identity constructions of medical trainees in clinical assessment activities.
    Liao KC; Ajjawi R; Peng CH; Jenq CC; Monrouxe LV
    Med Educ; 2023 Nov; 57(11):1102-1116. PubMed ID: 37394612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.