BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34912711)

  • 1. Does the Identification of a Minimum Number of Cases Correlate With Better Adherence to International Guidelines Regarding the Treatment of Penile Cancer? Survey Results of the European PROspective Penile Cancer Study (E-PROPS).
    Lebentrau S; Wakileh GA; Schostak M; Schmid HP; Suarez-Ibarrola R; Merseburger AS; Hutterer GC; Necknig UH; Rink M; Bögemann M; Kluth LA; Pycha A; Burger M; Brookman-May SD; Bründl J; May M
    Front Oncol; 2021; 11():759362. PubMed ID: 34912711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adherence to the EAU Guideline Recommendations for Local Tumor Treatment in Penile Cancer: Results of the European PROspective Penile Cancer Study Group Survey (E-PROPS).
    Pallauf M; Hempel MC; Hupe MC; May M; Haccius M; Weckermann D; Lebentrau S; Hoschke B; Necknig U; Pfitzenmaier J; Manka L; Nuhn P; Törzsök P; Lusuardi L; Merseburger AS
    Adv Ther; 2020 Dec; 37(12):4969-4980. PubMed ID: 33038006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adherence to the EAU guideline recommendations for systemic chemotherapy in penile cancer: results of the E-PROPS study group survey.
    Distler FA; Pahernik S; Gakis G; Hutterer G; Lebentrau S; Rink M; Nuhn P; Brookman-May S; Burger M; Gratzke C; Wolff I; May M
    World J Urol; 2020 Oct; 38(10):2523-2530. PubMed ID: 31834472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adherence to European Association of Urology and National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines Criteria for Inguinal and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Penile Cancer Patients-A Survey Assessment in German-speaking Countries on Behalf of the European Prospective Penile Cancer Study Group.
    Suarez-Ibarrola R; Zengerling F; Haccius M; Lebentrau S; Schmid HP; Bier M; Lenart S; Distler FA; Resch I; Oelschlager M; May M; Bolenz C; Gratzke C; Miernik A; Wakileh GA
    Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Jul; 7(4):843-849. PubMed ID: 32089496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of the Standardization of Penile Cancer Care on the Quality of Care, Outcomes, and Academic-driven Centralization in a Single eUROGEN Referral Center.
    Pecoraro A; Elst L; Roussel E; Miletić M; Vanthoor J; De Ridder D; Van Rompuy AS; De Cuyper E; Dumez H; De Meerleer G; de Wever L; Goffin K; Van Poppel H; Joniau S; Albersen M
    Eur Urol Focus; 2024 Jan; 10(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 37537111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Are there any volume-related effects on treatment options for patients with penile cancer? Results of a survey among university hospitals in Germany and Austria].
    Lebentrau S; Yakac A; Lusuardi L; Thomas C; Sarcan S; Burger M; Merseburger AS; Wiegland J; Gilfrich C; Wolff I; May M
    Aktuelle Urol; 2023 Aug; 54(4):285-291. PubMed ID: 37339667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Penile cancer--Guideline adherence produces optimum results.
    Breen KJ; O'Connor KM; Power DG; Mayer NJ; Rogers E; Sweeney P
    Surgeon; 2015 Aug; 13(4):200-6. PubMed ID: 24559898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adherence of the indication to European Association of Urology guideline recommended pelvic lymph node dissection at a high-volume center: Differences between open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Schiffmann J; Haese A; Leyh-Bannurah SR; Salomon G; Steuber T; Schlomm T; Boehm K; Beyer B; Larcher A; Michl U; Heinzer H; Huland H; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Nov; 41(11):1547-53. PubMed ID: 26117216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Centralization of Penile Cancer Management in the United States: A Combined Analysis of the American Board of Urology and National Cancer Data Base.
    Matulewicz RS; Flum AS; Helenowski I; Jovanovic B; Palis B; Bilimoria KY; Meeks JJ
    Urology; 2016 Apr; 90():82-8. PubMed ID: 26827845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adherence to EAU guidelines on penile cancer translates into better outcomes: a multicenter international study.
    Cindolo L; Spiess PE; Bada M; Chipollini JJ; Nyirády P; Chiodini P; Varga J; Ditonno P; Battaglia M; De Nunzio C; Tema G; Veccia A; Antonelli A; Musi G; De Cobelli O; Conti A; Micali S; Álvarez-Maestro M; Olarte JQ; Diogenes E; Lima MVA; Tracey A; Guruli G; Autorino R; Sountoulides P; Schips L
    World J Urol; 2019 Aug; 37(8):1649-1657. PubMed ID: 30377813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Centralizing Penile Cancer Care in Germany and Austria: Just a Dream or a Fast-Approaching Reality? Results of a Survey Study among Urological Department Chairs and Modeling of Real Treatment Numbers of Penile Cancer Patients.
    Yakac A; Lebentrau S; Lusuardi L; Sarcan S; Burger M; Merseburger AS; Wiegland J; Gilfrich C; Wolff I; Ahyai S; May M; Thomas C
    Urol Int; 2023; 107(10-12):916-923. PubMed ID: 37918360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. EAU guidelines on penile cancer: 2014 update.
    Hakenberg OW; Compérat EM; Minhas S; Necchi A; Protzel C; Watkin N
    Eur Urol; 2015 Jan; 67(1):142-150. PubMed ID: 25457021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Management of the lymph nodes in penile cancer.
    Heyns CF; Fleshner N; Sangar V; Schlenker B; Yuvaraja TB; van Poppel H
    Urology; 2010 Aug; 76(2 Suppl 1):S43-57. PubMed ID: 20691885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Making surgery safer by centralization of care: impact of case load in penile cancer.
    Vanthoor J; Thomas A; Tsaur I; Albersen M;
    World J Urol; 2020 Jun; 38(6):1385-1390. PubMed ID: 31292733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of Incidence and Surgical Treatment of Penile Cancer in Germany from 2006 to 2016: Potential Implications for Future Management.
    Groeben C; Koch R; Kraywinkel K; Buttmann-Schweiger N; Baunacke M; Borkowetz A; Thomas C; Huber J
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Dec; 28(13):9190-9198. PubMed ID: 34120266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: Summary of the 2020 Guidelines.
    Witjes JA; Bruins HM; Cathomas R; Compérat EM; Cowan NC; Gakis G; Hernández V; Linares Espinós E; Lorch A; Neuzillet Y; Rouanne M; Thalmann GN; Veskimäe E; Ribal MJ; van der Heijden AG
    Eur Urol; 2021 Jan; 79(1):82-104. PubMed ID: 32360052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Current practice patterns of society of urologic oncology members in performing inguinal lymph node staging/therapy for penile cancer: A survey study.
    Marilin N; Master VA; Pettaway CA; Spiess PE
    Urol Oncol; 2021 Jul; 39(7):439.e9-439.e15. PubMed ID: 33775532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of radioisotope-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy in penile cancer: verification in consideration of the European guidelines.
    Schubert T; Uphoff J; Henke RP; Wawroschek F; Winter A
    BMC Urol; 2015 Sep; 15():98. PubMed ID: 26416391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hospital and surgical caseload are predictors of comprehensive surgical treatment for bladder cancer: a population based study.
    Abdollah F; Schmitges J; Sun M; Thuret R; Djahangirian O; Jeldres C; Shariat SF; Graefen M; Perrotte P; Montorsi F; Karakiewicz PI
    J Urol; 2011 Sep; 186(3):824-8. PubMed ID: 21788051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Usage and survival implications of surgical staging of inguinal lymph nodes in intermediate- to high-risk, clinical localized penile cancer: A propensity-score matched analysis.
    Woldu SL; Ci B; Hutchinson RC; Krabbe LM; Singla N; Passoni NM; Clinton TN; Raj GV; Miller DS; Sagalowsky AI; Lotan Y; Xie Y; Margulis V; Bagrodia A
    Urol Oncol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):159.e7-159.e17. PubMed ID: 29288008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.