159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34913140)
1. You won't guess that: On the limited benefits of guessing when learning a foreign language.
Butowska E; Hanczakowski M; Zawadzka K
Mem Cognit; 2022 Jul; 50(5):1033-1047. PubMed ID: 34913140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Guessing can benefit memory for related word pairs even when feedback is delayed.
Zawadzka K; Zaborowska O; Butowska E; Piątkowski K; Hanczakowski M
Mem Cognit; 2023 Jul; 51(5):1235-1248. PubMed ID: 36633821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating the contributions of task expectancy in the testing and guessing benefits on recognition memory.
Huff MJ; Yates TJ; Balota DA
Memory; 2018 Sep; 26(8):1065-1083. PubMed ID: 29723114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of recall, reproduction, and restudy on word learning: a pre-registered study.
Krishnan S; Watkins KE; Bishop DVM
BMC Psychol; 2017 Aug; 5(1):28. PubMed ID: 28778213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two routes to memory benefits of guessing.
Zawadzka K; Hanczakowski M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1748-1760. PubMed ID: 30570326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. When is guessing incorrectly better than studying for enhancing memory?
Vaughn KE; Rawson KA
Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Oct; 19(5):899-905. PubMed ID: 22688538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The costs and benefits of testing and guessing on recognition memory.
Huff MJ; Balota DA; Hutchison KA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1559-1572. PubMed ID: 26950490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Repeated guessing attempts during acquisition can promote subsequent recall performance.
Kliegl O; Bartl J; Bäuml KT
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2024 Jun; 30(2):282-292. PubMed ID: 37561423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Metamemory expectancy illusion and schema-consistent guessing in source monitoring.
Schaper ML; Kuhlmann BG; Bayen UJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Mar; 45(3):470-496. PubMed ID: 30024249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnosing criterion-level effects on memory: what aspects of memory are enhanced by repeated retrieval?
Vaughn KE; Rawson KA
Psychol Sci; 2011 Sep; 22(9):1127-31. PubMed ID: 21813798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The benefits of impossible tests: Assessing the role of error-correction in the pretesting effect.
Seabrooke T; Mitchell CJ; Wills AJ; Inkster AB; Hollins TJ
Mem Cognit; 2022 Feb; 50(2):296-311. PubMed ID: 34363196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Repeated retrieval practice and item difficulty: does criterion learning eliminate item difficulty effects?
Vaughn KE; Rawson KA; Pyc MA
Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Dec; 20(6):1239-45. PubMed ID: 23589200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pretesting boosts recognition, but not cued recall, of targets from unrelated word pairs.
Seabrooke T; Mitchell CJ; Wills AJ; Hollins TJ
Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Feb; 28(1):268-273. PubMed ID: 32959192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of forced recall on illusory recollection in younger and older adults.
Meade ML; Roediger HL
Am J Psychol; 2006; 119(3):433-62. PubMed ID: 17061694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Why is test-restudy practice beneficial for memory? An evaluation of the mediator shift hypothesis.
Pyc MA; Rawson KA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):737-46. PubMed ID: 22060276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Age differences in collaborative memory: the role of retrieval manipulations.
Meade ML; Roediger HL
Mem Cognit; 2009 Oct; 37(7):962-75. PubMed ID: 19744936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Working memory load in the initial learning phase facilitates relearning: a study of vocabulary learning.
Sasaki T
Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Feb; 106(1):317-27. PubMed ID: 18459381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of unsuccessful retrieval on children's subsequent learning.
Carneiro P; Lapa A; Finn B
J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Feb; 166():400-420. PubMed ID: 29032207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lexical and semantic search in cued recall, fragment completion, perceptual identification, and recognition.
Nelson DL; McEvoy CL; Bajo MT
Am J Psychol; 1988; 101(4):465-80. PubMed ID: 3232723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retrieval practice via corrective feedback: is learning better for targets in an expected or surprising sense?
Burt JS; Leggett JMI; Chalmers KA; Boulton PA
Memory; 2021 Nov; 29(10):1396-1410. PubMed ID: 34634998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]