These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34913140)

  • 21. Test-potentiated learning: three independent replications, a disconfirmed hypothesis, and an unexpected boundary condition.
    Wissman KT; Rawson KA
    Memory; 2018 Apr; 26(4):406-414. PubMed ID: 28691577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The production effect in paired-associate learning: benefits for item and associative information.
    Putnam AL; Ozubko JD; Macleod CM; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Apr; 42(3):409-20. PubMed ID: 24154982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of testing on subsequent re-encoding and long-term forgetting of action-relevant materials: On the influence of recall type.
    Kubik V; Nilsson LG; Olofsson JK; Jönsson FU
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Oct; 56(5):475-81. PubMed ID: 26243692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Feeling of knowing and restudy choices.
    Hanczakowski M; Zawadzka K; Cockcroft-McKay C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1617-22. PubMed ID: 24659050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Putting action into testing: Enacted retrieval benefits long-term retention more than covert retrieval.
    Kubik V; Jönsson FU; de Jonge M; Arshamian A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Dec; 73(12):2093-2105. PubMed ID: 32686985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. What types of learning are enhanced by a cued recall test?
    Carpenter SK; Pashler H; Vul E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):826-30. PubMed ID: 17328380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dopamine Enhances Item Novelty Detection via Hippocampal and Associative Recall via Left Lateral Prefrontal Cortex Mechanisms.
    Clos M; Bunzeck N; Sommer T
    J Neurosci; 2019 Oct; 39(40):7920-7933. PubMed ID: 31405927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Lower constraint testing enhances the testing effect for some contextual details but not others.
    Giannakopoulos KL; McCurdy MP; Sklenar AM; Frankenstein AN; Urban Levy P; Leshikar ED
    Brain Behav; 2024 Jan; 14(1):e3380. PubMed ID: 38376029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Adaptive memory: Animacy enhances free recall but impairs cued recall.
    Popp EY; Serra MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Feb; 42(2):186-201. PubMed ID: 26375781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Production does not improve memory for face-name associations.
    Hourihan KL; Smith AR
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 27244356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Why does guessing incorrectly enhance, rather than impair, retention?
    Yan VX; Yu Y; Garcia MA; Bjork RA
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Nov; 42(8):1373-83. PubMed ID: 25120240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Vocabulary Learning During Reading: Benefits of Contextual Inferences Versus Retrieval Opportunities.
    van den Broek GSE; Wesseling E; Huijssen L; Lettink M; van Gog T
    Cogn Sci; 2022 Apr; 46(4):e13135. PubMed ID: 35436027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Why testing improves memory: mediator effectiveness hypothesis.
    Pyc MA; Rawson KA
    Science; 2010 Oct; 330(6002):335. PubMed ID: 20947756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of presentation rate on foreign-language vocabulary learning.
    Zeelenberg R; de Jonge M; Tabbers HK; Pecher D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(6):1101-15. PubMed ID: 25397973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Attention and the testing effect.
    Mulligan NW; Picklesimer M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jun; 42(6):938-50. PubMed ID: 26618913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Enhancing retention through reconsolidation: negative emotional arousal following retrieval enhances later recall.
    Finn B; Roediger HL
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Jun; 22(6):781-6. PubMed ID: 21537055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The role of verbal and pictorial information in multimodal incidental acquisition of foreign language vocabulary.
    Bisson MJ; van Heuven WJ; Conklin K; Tunney RJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(7):1306-26. PubMed ID: 25383918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Guessing versus misremembering in recognition: A comparison of continuous, two-high-threshold, and low-threshold models.
    Starns JJ; Ma Q
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(4):527-539. PubMed ID: 28933897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The testing effect under divided attention.
    Buchin ZL; Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1934-1947. PubMed ID: 28504527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Progressive retrieval practice leads to greater memory for image-word pairs than standard retrieval practice.
    Liu S; Zheng Z; Kent C; Briscoe J
    Memory; 2022 Aug; 30(7):796-805. PubMed ID: 35638593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.