These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34913249)

  • 21. Large, chemically diverse dataset of logP measurements for benchmarking studies.
    Martel S; Gillerat F; Carosati E; Maiarelli D; Tetko IV; Mannhold R; Carrupt PA
    Eur J Pharm Sci; 2013 Jan; 48(1-2):21-9. PubMed ID: 23131797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. SVM approach for predicting LogP.
    Liao Q; Yao J; Yuan S
    Mol Divers; 2006 Aug; 10(3):301-9. PubMed ID: 17031534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Estimation of alkane-water logP for neutral, acidic, and basic compounds using an alkylated polystyrene-divinylbenzene high-performance liquid chromatography column.
    Jensen DA; Gary RK
    J Chromatogr A; 2015 Oct; 1417():21-9. PubMed ID: 26372447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Is there enough focus on lipophilicity in drug discovery?
    Lobo S
    Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2020 Mar; 15(3):261-263. PubMed ID: 31736369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Extension of the liquid chromatography/quantitative structure-property relationship method to assess the lipophilicity of neutral, acidic, basic and amphotheric drugs.
    Pallicer JM; Calvet C; Port A; Rosés M; Ràfols C; Bosch E
    J Chromatogr A; 2012 Jun; 1240():113-22. PubMed ID: 22537604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bile acid structure-activity relationship: evaluation of bile acid lipophilicity using 1-octanol/water partition coefficient and reverse phase HPLC.
    Roda A; Minutello A; Angellotti MA; Fini A
    J Lipid Res; 1990 Aug; 31(8):1433-43. PubMed ID: 2280184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Relative hydrophobicity and lipophilicity of drugs measured by aqueous two-phase partitioning, octanol-buffer partitioning and HPLC. A simple model for predicting blood-brain distribution.
    Gulyaeva N; Zaslavsky A; Lechner P; Chlenov M; McConnell O; Chait A; Kipnis V; Zaslavsky B
    Eur J Med Chem; 2003 Apr; 38(4):391-6. PubMed ID: 12750026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Biorelevant physicochemical profiling of (E)- and (Z)-resveratrol determined from isomeric mixtures.
    Orgován G; Gonda I; Noszál B
    J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2017 May; 138():322-329. PubMed ID: 28242573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Drug-phospholipid interactions. 2. Predicting the sites of drug distribution using n-octanol/water and membrane/water distribution coefficients.
    Barton P; Davis AM; McCarthy DJ; Webborn PJ
    J Pharm Sci; 1997 Sep; 86(9):1034-9. PubMed ID: 9294818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Improving drug candidates by design: a focus on physicochemical properties as a means of improving compound disposition and safety.
    Meanwell NA
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2011 Sep; 24(9):1420-56. PubMed ID: 21790149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. LogP, a yesterday's value?
    Vraka C; Nics L; Wagner KH; Hacker M; Wadsak W; Mitterhauser M
    Nucl Med Biol; 2017 Jul; 50():1-10. PubMed ID: 28364662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Improvement in the Predicted Partitioning of Alcohol and Polyethylene Oxide Groups Between Water and Octanol (logP) in Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
    Warren DB; McPhee E; Birru WA; Benameur H; Chalmers DK; Pouton CW
    J Pharm Sci; 2019 Jan; 108(1):214-222. PubMed ID: 30468829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Setup and validation of shake-flask procedures for the determination of partition coefficients (logD) from low drug amounts.
    Andrés A; Rosés M; Ràfols C; Bosch E; Espinosa S; Segarra V; Huerta JM
    Eur J Pharm Sci; 2015 Aug; 76():181-91. PubMed ID: 25968358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The use of phospholipid modified column for the determination of lipophilic properties in high performance liquid chromatography.
    Godard T; Grushka E
    J Chromatogr A; 2011 Mar; 1218(9):1211-8. PubMed ID: 21256500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Systematic Investigation of Lipophilicity Modulation by Aliphatic Fluorination Motifs.
    Jeffries B; Wang Z; Felstead HR; Le Questel JY; Scott JS; Chiarparin E; Graton J; Linclau B
    J Med Chem; 2020 Feb; 63(3):1002-1031. PubMed ID: 31894985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Electrochemical determination of partition coefficients of drugs.
    Kontturi K; Murtomäki L
    J Pharm Sci; 1992 Oct; 81(10):970-5. PubMed ID: 1432622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Lipophilic Permeability Efficiency Reconciles the Opposing Roles of Lipophilicity in Membrane Permeability and Aqueous Solubility.
    Naylor MR; Ly AM; Handford MJ; Ramos DP; Pye CR; Furukawa A; Klein VG; Noland RP; Edmondson Q; Turmon AC; Hewitt WM; Schwochert J; Townsend CE; Kelly CN; Blanco MJ; Lokey RS
    J Med Chem; 2018 Dec; 61(24):11169-11182. PubMed ID: 30395703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Population, basicity and partition of short-lived conformers. Characterization of baclofen and pregabalin, the biaxial, doubly rotating drug molecules.
    Pálla T; Tóth G; Kraszni M; Mirzahosseini A; Noszál B
    Eur J Pharm Sci; 2018 Oct; 123():327-334. PubMed ID: 29981894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The role of ligand efficiency metrics in drug discovery.
    Hopkins AL; Keserü GM; Leeson PD; Rees DC; Reynolds CH
    Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2014 Feb; 13(2):105-21. PubMed ID: 24481311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Determination of drug lipophilicity by phosphatidylcholine-modified microemulsion high-performance liquid chromatography.
    Xuan X; Xu L; Li L; Gao C; Li N
    Int J Pharm; 2015 Jul; 490(1-2):258-64. PubMed ID: 25959117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.