These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34913249)

  • 41. Multivariate assessment of lipophilicity scales-computational and reversed phase thin-layer chromatographic indices.
    Andrić F; Bajusz D; Rácz A; Šegan S; Héberger K
    J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2016 Aug; 127():81-93. PubMed ID: 27155738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Accurate and efficient generalized born model based on solvent accessibility: derivation and application for LogP octanol/water prediction and flexible peptide docking.
    Totrov M
    J Comput Chem; 2004 Mar; 25(4):609-19. PubMed ID: 14735578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Separation methods for estimating octanol-water partition coefficients.
    Poole SK; Poole CF
    J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2003 Nov; 797(1-2):3-19. PubMed ID: 14630140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Updating molecular properties during early drug discovery.
    Caron G; Ermondi G
    Drug Discov Today; 2017 Jun; 22(6):835-840. PubMed ID: 27890670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Estimation of logP(ow) values for neutral and basic compounds by microchip microemulsion electrokinetic chromatography with indirect fluorimetric detection (muMEEKC-IFD).
    Tu J; Halsall HB; Seliskar CJ; Limbach PA; Arias F; Wehmeyer KR; Heineman WR
    J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2005 Jun; 38(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 15907611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A comparison of theoretical methods of calculation of partition coefficients for selected drugs.
    Pyka A; Babuśka M; Zachariasz M
    Acta Pol Pharm; 2006; 63(3):159-67. PubMed ID: 20085219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Integrating intramolecular hydrogen bonding (IMHB) considerations in drug discovery using ΔlogP as a tool.
    Shalaeva M; Caron G; Abramov YA; O'Connell TN; Plummer MS; Yalamanchi G; Farley KA; Goetz GH; Philippe L; Shapiro MJ
    J Med Chem; 2013 Jun; 56(12):4870-9. PubMed ID: 23710574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A New Straightforward Method for Lipophilicity (logP) Measurement using 19F NMR Spectroscopy.
    Wang Z; Jeffries BF; Felstead HR; Wells NJ; Chiarparin E; Linclau B
    J Vis Exp; 2019 Jan; (143):. PubMed ID: 30774129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Development of a simple proton nuclear magnetic resonance-based procedure to estimate the approximate distribution coefficient at physiological pH (logD
    Stéen EJL; Nyberg N; Lehel S; Andersen VL; Di Pilato P; Knudsen GM; Kristensen JL; Herth MM
    Bioorg Med Chem Lett; 2017 Jan; 27(2):319-322. PubMed ID: 27908763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Energy-entropy prediction of octanol-water logP of SAMPL7 N-acyl sulfonamide bioisosters.
    Falcioni F; Kalayan J; Henchman RH
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jul; 35(7):831-840. PubMed ID: 34244906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Computational prediction of octanol-water partition coefficient based on the extended solvent-contact model.
    Kim T; Park H
    J Mol Graph Model; 2015 Jul; 60():108-17. PubMed ID: 26142695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Recent methodologies for the estimation of n-octanol/water partition coefficients and their use in the prediction of membrane transport properties of drugs.
    Klopman G; Zhu H
    Mini Rev Med Chem; 2005 Feb; 5(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 15720283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Solvent constraints on the property space of acetylcholine. 2. Ordered media.
    Vistoli G; Pedretti A; Villa L; Testa B
    J Med Chem; 2005 Nov; 48(22):6926-35. PubMed ID: 16250651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Permeability diagnosis model in drug discovery: a diagnostic tool to identify the most influencing properties for gastrointestinal permeability.
    Wang J; Skolnik S
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2013; 13(11):1308-16. PubMed ID: 23675937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Physico-chemical profiling of centrally acting molecules for prediction of pharmacokinetic properties].
    Deák K
    Acta Pharm Hung; 2008; 78(3):110-20. PubMed ID: 18986088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Comparative study of lipophilicity from immobilized artificial chromatography and n-octanol/buffer systems].
    Sun J; Cheng G; He ZG; Wang SJ
    Yao Xue Xue Bao; 2003 Oct; 38(10):791-4. PubMed ID: 14730907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Getting physical in drug discovery II: the impact of chromatographic hydrophobicity measurements and aromaticity.
    Young RJ; Green DV; Luscombe CN; Hill AP
    Drug Discov Today; 2011 Sep; 16(17-18):822-30. PubMed ID: 21704184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Band-selective excitation NMR spectroscopy and quantitative time-domain analysis using Complete Reduction to Amplitude-Frequency Table (CRAFT) to determine distribution coefficients during drug development.
    Soulsby D
    Magn Reson Chem; 2019 Nov; 57(11):953-960. PubMed ID: 31070814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. ADME evaluation in drug discovery. 3. Modeling blood-brain barrier partitioning using simple molecular descriptors.
    Hou TJ; Xu XJ
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(6):2137-52. PubMed ID: 14632466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Accessing lipophilicity of drugs with biomimetic models: A comparative study using liposomes and micelles.
    Loureiro DRP; Soares JX; Lopes D; Macedo T; Yordanova D; Jakobtorweihen S; Nunes C; Reis S; Pinto MMM; Afonso CMM
    Eur J Pharm Sci; 2018 Mar; 115():369-380. PubMed ID: 29366962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.