These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34913850)

  • 1. Detecting Endpoint Error of an Ongoing Reaching Movement: the Role of Vision, Proprioception, and Efference.
    Kumawat AS; Manson GA; Welsh TN; Tremblay L
    J Mot Behav; 2022; 54(4):457-465. PubMed ID: 34913850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using proprioception to control ongoing actions: dominance of vision or altered proprioceptive weighing?
    Goodman R; Tremblay L
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jul; 236(7):1897-1910. PubMed ID: 29696313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proprioceptive Acuity is Enhanced During Arm Movements Compared to When the Arm is Stationary: A Study of Young and Older Adults.
    Coffman CR; Capaday C; Darling WG
    Neuroscience; 2021 Jul; 466():222-234. PubMed ID: 33905823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Proprioceptive loss and the perception, control and learning of arm movements in humans: evidence from sensory neuronopathy.
    Miall RC; Kitchen NM; Nam SH; Lefumat H; Renault AG; Ørstavik K; Cole JD; Sarlegna FR
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Aug; 236(8):2137-2155. PubMed ID: 29779050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High proprioceptive acuity in slow and fast hand movements.
    Yoss AL; Zuck BI; Yem JA; Darling WG
    Exp Brain Res; 2022 Jun; 240(6):1791-1800. PubMed ID: 35426512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Somatosensory target information is used for reaching but not for saccadic eye movements.
    Goettker A; Fiehler K; Voudouris D
    J Neurophysiol; 2020 Oct; 124(4):1092-1102. PubMed ID: 32845193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A key region in the human parietal cortex for processing proprioceptive hand feedback during reaching movements.
    Reichenbach A; Thielscher A; Peer A; Bülthoff HH; Bresciani JP
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 84():615-25. PubMed ID: 24060316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Target modality affects visually guided online control of reaching.
    Cameron BD; López-Moliner J
    Vision Res; 2015 May; 110(Pt B):233-43. PubMed ID: 24997229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of the cross-sensory error signal in visuomotor adaptation.
    Salomonczyk D; Cressman EK; Henriques DY
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Jul; 228(3):313-25. PubMed ID: 23708802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The interaction of visual and proprioceptive inputs in pointing to actual and remembered targets in Parkinson's disease.
    Adamovich SV; Berkinblit MB; Hening W; Sage J; Poizner H
    Neuroscience; 2001; 104(4):1027-41. PubMed ID: 11457588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Motor learning without moving: Proprioceptive and predictive hand localization after passive visuoproprioceptive discrepancy training.
    Mostafa AA; 't Hart BM; Henriques DYP
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0221861. PubMed ID: 31465524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visuo-proprioceptive interactions during adaptation of the human reach.
    Judkins T; Scheidt RA
    J Neurophysiol; 2014 Feb; 111(4):868-87. PubMed ID: 24259549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robot-Aided Upper-limb Proprioceptive Training in Three-Dimensional Space.
    Valdes BA; Khoshnam M; Neva JL; Menon C
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2019 Jun; 2019():121-126. PubMed ID: 31374617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reach endpoint errors do not vary with movement path of the proprioceptive target.
    Jones SA; Byrne PA; Fiehler K; Henriques DY
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Jun; 107(12):3316-24. PubMed ID: 22402658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Untangling visual and proprioceptive contributions to hand localisation over time.
    Bellan V; Gilpin HR; Stanton TR; Newport R; Gallace A; Moseley GL
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jun; 233(6):1689-701. PubMed ID: 25757958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of visuomotor adaptation on proprioceptive localization: the contributions of perceptual and motor changes.
    Clayton HA; Cressman EK; Henriques DY
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Jul; 232(7):2073-86. PubMed ID: 24623356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Paradoxical adaptation of successful movements: The crucial role of internal error signals.
    Gaveau V; Priot AE; Pisella L; Havé L; Prablanc C; Rossetti Y
    Conscious Cogn; 2018 Sep; 64():135-145. PubMed ID: 30025675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Force field adaptation can be learned using vision in the absence of proprioceptive error.
    Melendez-Calderon A; Masia L; Gassert R; Sandini G; Burdet E
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2011 Jun; 19(3):298-306. PubMed ID: 21652280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. External error attribution dampens efferent-based predictions but not proprioceptive changes in hand localization.
    Gastrock RQ; Modchalingam S; 't Hart BM; Henriques DYP
    Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):19918. PubMed ID: 33199805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of visuomotor-map uncertainty on visuomotor adaptation.
    Saijo N; Gomi H
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Mar; 107(6):1576-85. PubMed ID: 22190631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.