137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34914160)
1. Redo-surgery after failed colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: Morbidity, mortality and factors predictive of success. A retrospective study of 200 patients.
Calmels M; Collard MK; O'Connell L; Voron T; Debove C; Chafai N; Parc Y; Lefevre JH
Colorectal Dis; 2022 Apr; 24(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 34914160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Second redo surgery after two consecutive failures of a colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: is it reasonable?
Labiad C; Monsinjon M; Giacca M; Panis Y
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2021 Sep; 36(9):2057-2060. PubMed ID: 34169331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Redo coloanal anastomosis for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: an analysis of 59 cases.
Westerduin E; Borstlap WAA; Musters GD; Westerterp M; van Geloven AAW; Tanis PJ; Wolthuis AM; Bemelman WA; D'Hoore A
Colorectal Dis; 2018 Jan; 20(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 28795776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reversal of Hartmann's procedure in patients following failed colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: an analysis of 45 consecutive cases.
Caille C; Collard M; Moszkowicz D; Prost À la Denise J; Maggiori L; Panis Y
Colorectal Dis; 2020 Feb; 22(2):203-211. PubMed ID: 31536670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Redo-surgery by transanal colonic pull-through for failed anastomosis associated with chronic pelvic sepsis or rectovaginal fistula.
Maggiori L; Blanche J; Harnoy Y; Ferron M; Panis Y
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2015 Apr; 30(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 25586206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Postoperative and long-term outcomes after redo surgery for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: retrospective analysis of 50 patients and review of the literature.
Genser L; Manceau G; Karoui M; Breton S; Brevart C; Rousseau G; Vaillant JC; Hannoun L
Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Jun; 56(6):747-55. PubMed ID: 23652749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anastomotic stenosis after coloanal, colorectal and ileoanal anastomosis: what is the best management?
Kraenzler A; Maggiori L; Pittet O; Alyami MS; Prost À la Denise J; Panis Y
Colorectal Dis; 2017 Feb; 19(2):O90-O96. PubMed ID: 27996184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What is the functional result of a delayed coloanal anastomosis in redo rectal surgery?
Boullenois H; Lefevre JH; Creavin B; Calmels M; Voron T; Debove C; Chafai N; Parc Y
ANZ J Surg; 2019 May; 89(5):E179-E183. PubMed ID: 30968540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Functional outcomes of patients undergoing successful redo surgery after failed primary colorectal or coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer.
Collard MK; Calmels M; Creavin B; Boullenois H; Debove C; Chafai N; Parc Y; Lefevre JH
Surgery; 2021 Apr; 169(4):782-789. PubMed ID: 33276975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Delayed pull-through coloanal anastomosis without temporary stoma: an alternative to the standard manual side-to-end coloanal anastomosis with temporary stoma? A comparative study in 223 patients with low rectal cancer.
Melka D; Leiritz E; Labiad C; Blondeau M; Frontali A; Giacca M; Monsinjon M; Panis Y
Colorectal Dis; 2022 May; 24(5):587-593. PubMed ID: 35094470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Morbidity risk factors after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and coloanal anastomosis: a retrospective series of 483 patients.
Bennis M; Parc Y; Lefevre JH; Chafai N; Attal E; Tiret E
Ann Surg; 2012 Mar; 255(3):504-10. PubMed ID: 22281734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of faecal diversion in low rectal cancer: a review of 1791 patients having rectal resection with anastomosis for cancer, with and without a proximal stoma.
Nurkin S; Kakarla VR; Ruiz DE; Cance WG; Tiszenkel HI
Colorectal Dis; 2013 Jun; 15(6):e309-16. PubMed ID: 23586660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Redo coloanal anastomosis: a retrospective study of 66 patients.
Pitel S; Lefèvre JH; Tiret E; Chafai N; Parc Y
Ann Surg; 2012 Nov; 256(5):806-10; discussion 810-1. PubMed ID: 23095625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer: technique and long-term outcome.
Tekkis P; Tan E; Kontovounisios C; Kinross J; Georgiou C; Nicholls RJ; Rasheed S; Brown G
Colorectal Dis; 2015 Dec; 17(12):1062-70. PubMed ID: 26096142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcome After Redo Surgery for Complicated Colorectal and Coloanal Anastomosis: A Systematic Review.
Westerduin E; Klaver CEL; van Geloven AAW; Westerterp M; Bemelman WA; Tanis PJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2018 Aug; 61(8):988-998. PubMed ID: 29944585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Risk factors of coloanal anastomotic stricture after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer].
Zhang B; Zhuo GZ; Tian L; Zhao K; Zhao Y; Zhao YJ; Zhu J; Zhang T; Ding JH
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 22(8):755-761. PubMed ID: 31422614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term functional results and quality of life after redo rectal surgery: delayed versus immediate colo-anal anastomosis.
Boullenois H; Lefevre JH; Creavin B; Voron T; Debove C; Chafai N; Parc Y
Colorectal Dis; 2020 Aug; 22(8):885-893. PubMed ID: 31976608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Low anterior resection combined with a covering stoma in the treatment of rectal cancer reduces the risk of permanent anastomotic failure.
Räsänen M; Renkonen-Sinisalo L; Carpelan-Holmström M; Lepistö A
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1323-8. PubMed ID: 26111635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic delayed coloanal anastomosis without diverting ileostomy for low rectal cancer surgery: 85 consecutive patients from a single institution.
Sage PY; Trilling B; Waroquet PA; Voirin D; Girard E; Faucheron JL
Tech Coloproctol; 2018 Jul; 22(7):511-518. PubMed ID: 30027493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
