122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34914290)
21. Deoxyribonucleic acid-damaged sperm in cryopreserved-thawed specimens from cancer patients and healthy men.
Edelstein A; Yavetz H; Kleiman SE; Botchan A; Hauser R; Paz G; Yogev L
Fertil Steril; 2008 Jul; 90(1):205-8. PubMed ID: 17658528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Preservation of fertility of adult male cancer patients treated with chemotherapy.
Kawai K; Nishiyama H
Int J Clin Oncol; 2019 Jan; 24(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 30353257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Current status of sperm banking for young cancer patients in Japanese nationwide survey.
Yumura Y; Tsujimura A; Okada H; Ota K; Kitazawa M; Suzuki T; Kakinuma T; Takae S; Suzuki N; Iwamoto T
Asian J Androl; 2018; 20(4):336-341. PubMed ID: 29405167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Do malignant diseases affect semen quality? Sperm parameters of men with cancers.
Caponecchia L; Cimino G; Sacchetto R; Fiori C; Sebastianelli A; Salacone P; Marcucci I; Tomassini S; Rago R
Andrologia; 2016 Apr; 48(3):333-40. PubMed ID: 26173956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Testicular sperm extraction (TESE) and ICSI in patients with permanent azoospermia after chemotherapy.
Meseguer M; Garrido N; Remohí J; Pellicer A; Simón C; Martínez-Jabaloyas JM; Gil-Salom M
Hum Reprod; 2003 Jun; 18(6):1281-5. PubMed ID: 12773459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Autologous sperm usage after cryopreservation-the crucial impact of patients' characteristics.
Bitan R; Magnezi R; Kedem A; Avraham S; Youngster M; Yerushalmi G; Kaufman S; Umanski A; Hourvitz A; Gat I
Andrology; 2024 Mar; 12(3):527-537. PubMed ID: 37528799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Seasonal variations in pre- and post-thaw donor sperm quality.
Yogev L; Kleiman S; Shabtai E; Botchan A; Gamzu R; Paz G; Yavetz H; Hauser R
Hum Reprod; 2004 Apr; 19(4):880-5. PubMed ID: 14990539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Sperm banking and assisted reproductive outcome in men with cancer: a 10 years' experience.
Freour T; Mirallie S; Jean M; Barriere P
Int J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 17(6):598-603. PubMed ID: 21979750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assisted reproductive outcomes of male cancer survivors.
García A; Herrero MB; Holzer H; Tulandi T; Chan P
J Cancer Surviv; 2015 Jun; 9(2):208-14. PubMed ID: 25272983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An adapted carrier for the cryopreservation of human testicular spermatozoa.
Wang M; Wu Z; Hu Y; Wang Y; Tan Y; Xiang Y; Wang L; Jin L; Huang H
Reprod Biomed Online; 2018 Nov; 37(5):590-599. PubMed ID: 30366839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reliable single sperm cryopreservation in Cell Sleepers for azoospermia management.
Coetzee K; Ozgur K; Berkkanoglu M; Bulut H; Isikli A
Andrologia; 2016 Mar; 48(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 25988980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles with fresh testicular spermatozoa obtained on the day of or the day before oocyte collection and with cryopreserved testicular sperm in patients with azoospermia.
Karacan M; Alwaeely F; Erkan S; Çebi Z; Berberoğlugil M; Batukan M; Uluğ M; Arvas A; Çamlıbel T
Fertil Steril; 2013 Oct; 100(4):975-80. PubMed ID: 23891272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Successful testicular sperm extraction (TESE) in spite of high serum follicle stimulating hormone and azoospermia: correlation between testicular morphology, TESE results, semen analysis and serum hormone values in 103 infertile men.
Jezek D; Knuth UA; Schulze W
Hum Reprod; 1998 May; 13(5):1230-4. PubMed ID: 9647552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Influence of motility on the outcome of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection with fresh vs. frozen testicular sperm from men with obstructive azoospermia.
Park YS; Lee SH; Song SJ; Jun JH; Koong MK; Seo JT
Fertil Steril; 2003 Sep; 80(3):526-30. PubMed ID: 12969692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Patient factors associated with sperm cryopreservation among at-risk adolescents newly diagnosed with cancer.
Klosky JL; Lehmann V; Flynn JS; Su Y; Zhang H; Russell KM; Schenck LAM; Schover LR
Cancer; 2018 Sep; 124(17):3567-3575. PubMed ID: 29975417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Factors affecting storage of Slovak native rabbit semen in the gene bank.
Kulíková B; Oravcová M; Baláži A; Supuka P; Chrenek P
Zygote; 2017 Oct; 25(5):592-600. PubMed ID: 28835294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Monitoring fertility (semen analysis) by cancer survivors who banked sperm prior to cancer treatment.
Pacey AA; Merrick H; Arden-Close E; Morris K; Barton LC; Crook AJ; Tomlinson MJ; Wright E; Rowe R; Eiser C
Hum Reprod; 2012 Nov; 27(11):3132-9. PubMed ID: 22926842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [The Munich cryopreserved sperm bank--intermediate 1974-1986 evaluation].
Köhn FM; Schill WB
Hautarzt; 1988 Feb; 39(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 3360601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Reasons for rejecting potential donors from a sperm bank program.
Sidhu RS; Sharma RK; Kachoria S; Curtis C; Agarwal A
J Assist Reprod Genet; 1997 Jul; 14(6):354-60. PubMed ID: 9226516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Analysis of the screening results of 24040 potential sperm donors in a human sperm bank in Henan Province, China: a 14-year retrospective cohort study.
Liu J; Dai Y; Li Y; Yuan E; Wang Q; Guan Y; Lou H
Hum Reprod; 2021 Apr; 36(5):1205-1212. PubMed ID: 33611556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
