BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34914718)

  • 21. User Control of Personal mHealth Data Using a Mobile Blockchain App: Design Science Perspective.
    Sengupta A; Subramanian H
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2022 Jan; 10(1):e32104. PubMed ID: 35049504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mobile health and privacy: cross sectional study.
    Tangari G; Ikram M; Ijaz K; Kaafar MA; Berkovsky S
    BMJ; 2021 Jun; 373():n1248. PubMed ID: 34135009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Spanish adaptation and validation of the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS).
    Martin-Payo R; Carrasco-Santos S; Cuesta M; Stoyan S; Gonzalez-Mendez X; Fernandez-Alvarez MDM
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2021 Nov; 28(12):2681-2686. PubMed ID: 34613400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Promoting Health via mHealth Applications Using a French Version of the Mobile App Rating Scale: Adaptation and Validation Study.
    Saliasi I; Martinon P; Darlington E; Smentek C; Tardivo D; Bourgeois D; Dussart C; Carrouel F; Fraticelli L
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Aug; 9(8):e30480. PubMed ID: 34463623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Smartphone Users' Persuasion Knowledge in the Context of Consumer mHealth Apps: Qualitative Study.
    Joo E; Kononova A; Kanthawala S; Peng W; Cotten S
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Apr; 9(4):e16518. PubMed ID: 33847596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Factors Related to User Ratings and User Downloads of Mobile Apps for Maternal and Infant Health: Cross-Sectional Study.
    Biviji R; Vest JR; Dixon BE; Cullen T; Harle CA
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Jan; 8(1):e15663. PubMed ID: 32012107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Weight Management Apps in Saudi Arabia: Evaluation of Features and Quality.
    Alshathri DM; Alhumaimeedy AS; Al-Hudhud G; Alsaleh A; Al-Musharaf S; Aljuraiban GS
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Oct; 8(10):e19844. PubMed ID: 33104013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mobile Phone Apps for Food Allergies or Intolerances in App Stores: Systematic Search and Quality Assessment Using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS).
    Mandracchia F; Llauradó E; Tarro L; Valls RM; Solà R
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Sep; 8(9):e18339. PubMed ID: 32936078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluating Asthma Mobile Apps to Improve Asthma Self-Management: User Ratings and Sentiment Analysis of Publicly Available Apps.
    Camacho-Rivera M; Vo H; Huang X; Lau J; Lawal A; Kawaguchi A
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Oct; 8(10):e15076. PubMed ID: 33118944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Analyzing security issues of android mobile health and medical applications.
    Tangari G; Ikram M; Sentana IWB; Ijaz K; Kaafar MA; Berkovsky S
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2021 Sep; 28(10):2074-2084. PubMed ID: 34338763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mobile health technologies for the management of urinary incontinence: A systematic review of online stores in Brazil.
    Dantas LO; Carvalho C; Santos BLJ; Ferreira CHJ; Bø K; Driusso P
    Braz J Phys Ther; 2021; 25(4):387-395. PubMed ID: 33468447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quality of Psychoeducational Apps for Military Members With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: An Evaluation Utilizing the Mobile Application Rating Scale.
    Jones C; O'Toole K; Jones K; Brémault-Phillips S
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Aug; 8(8):e19807. PubMed ID: 32808937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. What Do People Want in a Smoking Cessation App? An Analysis of User Reviews and App Quality.
    Bendotti H; Lawler S; Ireland D; Gartner C; Hides L; Marshall HM
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2022 Feb; 24(2):169-177. PubMed ID: 34460922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. mHealth apps for gestational diabetes mellitus that provide clinical decision support or artificial intelligence: A scoping review.
    Daley BJ; Ni'Man M; Neves MR; Bobby Huda MS; Marsh W; Fenton NE; Hitman GA; McLachlan S
    Diabet Med; 2022 Jan; 39(1):e14735. PubMed ID: 34726798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mobile applications for diabetics: a systematic review and expert-based usability evaluation considering the special requirements of diabetes patients age 50 years or older.
    Arnhold M; Quade M; Kirch W
    J Med Internet Res; 2014 Apr; 16(4):e104. PubMed ID: 24718852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Making Self-Management Mobile Health Apps Accessible to People With Disabilities: Qualitative Single-Subject Study.
    Zhou L; Saptono A; Setiawan IMA; Parmanto B
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Jan; 8(1):e15060. PubMed ID: 31899453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A data encryption solution for mobile health apps in cooperation environments.
    Silva BM; Rodrigues JJ; Canelo F; Lopes IC; Zhou L
    J Med Internet Res; 2013 Apr; 15(4):e66. PubMed ID: 23624056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. German Mobile Apps in Rheumatology: Review and Analysis Using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS).
    Knitza J; Tascilar K; Messner EM; Meyer M; Vossen D; Pulla A; Bosch P; Kittler J; Kleyer A; Sewerin P; Mucke J; Haase I; Simon D; Krusche M
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Aug; 7(8):e14991. PubMed ID: 31381501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Server-Focused Security Assessment of Mobile Health Apps for Popular Mobile Platforms.
    Müthing J; Brüngel R; Friedrich CM
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Jan; 21(1):e9818. PubMed ID: 30672738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A Pilot Evaluation of mHealth App Accessibility for Three Top-Rated Weight Management Apps by People with Disabilities.
    Radcliffe E; Lippincott B; Anderson R; Jones M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Apr; 18(7):. PubMed ID: 33915917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.