217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34914756)
1. Cultural factors weaken but do not reverse left-to-right spatial biases in numerosity processing: Data from Arabic and English monoliterates and Arabic-English biliterates.
Lopiccolo D; Chang CB
PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261146. PubMed ID: 34914756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. SNARC for numerosities is modulated by comparative instruction (and resembles some non-numerical effects).
Patro K; Shaki S
Cogn Process; 2016 May; 17(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 26714804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spatial-numerical association of response code effect as a window to mental representation of magnitude in long-term memory among Hebrew-speaking children.
Feldman A; Oscar-Strom Y; Tzelgov J; Berger A
J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 May; 181():102-109. PubMed ID: 30735908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On the instability and constraints of the interaction between number representation and spatial attention in healthy humans: A concise review of the literature and new experimental evidence.
Fattorini E; Pinto M; Merola S; D'Onofrio M; Doricchi F
Prog Brain Res; 2016; 227():223-56. PubMed ID: 27339014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. SNARC effects with numerical and non-numerical symbolic comparative judgments: instructional and cultural dependencies.
Shaki S; Petrusic WM; Leth-Steensen C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):515-30. PubMed ID: 22288694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bisections in two languages: when number processing, spatial representation, and habitual reading direction interact.
Kazandjian S; Cavézian C; Zivotofsky AZ; Chokron S
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Dec; 48(14):4031-7. PubMed ID: 20965204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reading space into numbers: a cross-linguistic comparison of the SNARC effect.
Shaki S; Fischer MH
Cognition; 2008 Aug; 108(2):590-9. PubMed ID: 18514179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bad-good constraints on a polarity correspondence account for the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) and markedness association of response codes (MARC) effects.
Leth-Steensen C; Citta R
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):482-94. PubMed ID: 26213330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. It takes just one word to quash a SNARC.
Fischer MH; Shaki S; Cruise A
Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(5):361-6. PubMed ID: 19447752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. It does exist! A left-to-right spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect among native Hebrew speakers.
Zohar-Shai B; Tzelgov J; Karni A; Rubinsten O
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Apr; 43(4):719-728. PubMed ID: 28182477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The SNARC effect in the processing of second-language number words: further evidence for strong lexico-semantic connections.
De Brauwer J; Duyck W; Brysbaert M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Mar; 61(3):444-58. PubMed ID: 17853205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments.
Bae GY; Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1506-21. PubMed ID: 19857020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Instructional Dependency of SNARC Effects Reveals Flexibility of the Space-Magnitude Association of Nonsymbolic and Symbolic Magnitudes.
Lee D; Chun J; Cho S
Perception; 2016 May; 45(5):552-67. PubMed ID: 27151510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automaticity of access to numerical magnitude and its spatial associations: The role of task and number representation.
Cleland AA; Bull R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):333-348. PubMed ID: 29708369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Asymmetric bias in perception of facial affect among Roman and Arabic script readers.
Heath RL; Rouhana A; Ghanem DA
Laterality; 2005 Jan; 10(1):51-64. PubMed ID: 15841823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implicit response-irrelevant number information triggers the SNARC effect: evidence using a neural overlap paradigm.
Mitchell T; Bull R; Cleland AA
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(10):1945-61. PubMed ID: 22524699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does the spatial-numerical association of response codes effect depend on digits' relative or absolute magnitude? Evidence from a perceptual orientation judgment task.
Yu S; Li B; Zhang S; Yang T; Jiang T; Chen C; Dong Q
J Gen Psychol; 2018; 145(4):415-430. PubMed ID: 30457038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mapping of non-numerical domains on space: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Macnamara A; Keage HAD; Loetscher T
Exp Brain Res; 2018 Feb; 236(2):335-346. PubMed ID: 29279982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Grammatical number elicits SNARC and MARC effects as a function of task demands.
Roettger TB; Domahs F
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(6):1231-48. PubMed ID: 25384199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How to rapidly construct a spatial-numerical representation in preliterate children (at least temporarily).
Patro K; Fischer U; Nuerk HC; Cress U
Dev Sci; 2016 Jan; 19(1):126-44. PubMed ID: 25939433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
