These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34917813)

  • 21. Remote magnetic navigation facilitates the ablations of frequent ventricular premature complexes originating from the outflow tract and the valve annulus as compared to manual control navigation.
    Qiu X; Zhang N; Luo Q; Liu A; Ji Y; Ye J; Lin C; Ling T; Chen K; Pan W; Zhao J; Jin Q; Wu L
    Int J Cardiol; 2018 Sep; 267():94-99. PubMed ID: 29957265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. MAGNETIC VT study: a prospective, multicenter, post-market randomized controlled trial comparing VT ablation outcomes using remote magnetic navigation-guided substrate mapping and ablation versus manual approach in a low LVEF population.
    Di Biase L; Tung R; Szili-Torok T; Burkhardt JD; Weiss P; Tavernier R; Berman AE; Wissner E; Spear W; Chen X; Neužil P; Skoda J; Lakkireddy D; Schwagten B; Lock K; Natale A;
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2017 Apr; 48(3):237-245. PubMed ID: 28064433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Efficacy and safety of remote magnetic catheter navigation vs. manual steerable sheath-guided ablation for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a case-control study.
    Koutalas E; Bertagnolli L; Sommer P; Richter S; Rolf S; Breithardt O; Bollmann A; Hindricks G; Arya A
    Europace; 2015 Feb; 17(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 25336662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Long-term outcomes of the current remote magnetic catheter navigation technique for ablation of atrial fibrillation.
    Yuan S; Holmqvist F; Kongstad O; Jensen SM; Wang L; Ljungström E; Hertervig E; Borgquist R
    Scand Cardiovasc J; 2017 Dec; 51(6):308-315. PubMed ID: 28958165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Advanced electrophysiologic mapping systems: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2006; 6(8):1-101. PubMed ID: 23074499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impact of sex on clinical, procedural characteristics and outcomes of catheter ablation for ventricular arrhythmias according to underlying heart disease.
    Pham T; Bennett R; Kanawati J; Campbell T; Turnbull S; Thomas SP; Kumar S
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2023 Jan; 66(1):203-213. PubMed ID: 35353320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Robotic magnetic navigation-guided catheter ablation establishes highly effective pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation when compared to conventional ablation techniques.
    Noten AME; Romanov A; De Schouwer K; Beloborodov V; Bhagwandien R; Hoogendijk MG; Mikheenko I; Wijchers S; Yap SC; Schwagten B; Szili-Torok T
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2023 Dec; 34(12):2472-2483. PubMed ID: 37767745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Catheter Ablation of Ischemic Ventricular Tachycardia With Remote Magnetic Navigation: STOP-VT Multicenter Trial.
    Skoda J; Arya A; Garcia F; Gerstenfeld E; Marchlinski F; Hindricks G; Miller J; Petru J; Sediva L; Sha Q; Janotka M; Chovanec M; Waldauf P; Neuzil P; Reddy VY
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Mar; 27 Suppl 1():S29-37. PubMed ID: 26969220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Strategy of catheter ablation for para-Hisian premature ventricular contractions with the assistance of remote magnetic navigation.
    Xie Y; Jin Q; Zhang N; Liu A; Xing C; Jia K; Wei Y; Bao Y; Luo Q; Lin C; Ling T; Chen K; Pan W; Wu L
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Dec; 30(12):2929-2935. PubMed ID: 31638712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Catheter Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia in Ischaemic Versus Non-Ischaemic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Kanagaratnam A; Virk SA; Pham T; Anderson RD; Turnbull S; Campbell T; Bennett R; Thomas SP; Lee G; Kumar S
    Heart Lung Circ; 2022 Aug; 31(8):1064-1074. PubMed ID: 35643798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Beyond the Storm: Comparison of Clinical Factors, Arrhythmogenic Substrate, and Catheter Ablation Outcomes in Structural Heart Disease Patients With versus Those Without a History of Ventricular Tachycardia Storm.
    Kumar S; Fujii A; Kapur S; Romero J; Mehta NK; Tanigawa S; Epstein LM; Koplan BA; Michaud GF; John RM; Stevenson WG; Tedrow UB
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2017 Jan; 28(1):56-67. PubMed ID: 27781325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Meta-analysis comparing outcomes of catheter ablation for ventricular arrhythmia in ischemic versus nonischemic cardiomyopathy.
    Basu-Ray I; Khanra D; Shah SK; Mukherjee A; Char SV; Jain B; Bunch TJ; Gold M; Adeboye AA; Saeed M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2021 Jan; 44(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 33216394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Remote magnetic navigation versus manual catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A single center long-term comparison.
    Schlögl S; Schlögl KS; Haarmann H; Bengel P; Bergau L; Rasenack E; Hasenfuss G; Zabel M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2022 Jan; 45(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 34687054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Procedural outcomes and learning curve of cardiac arrhythmias catheter ablation using remote magnetic navigation: Experience from a large-scale single-center study.
    Li X; Jin Q; Zhang N; Ling T; Lin C; Jia K; Bao Y; Xie Y; Wei Y; Chen K; Pan W; Xie Y; Wu L
    Clin Cardiol; 2020 Sep; 43(9):968-975. PubMed ID: 32453461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Feasibility of a novel mapping system combined with remote magnetic navigation for catheter ablation of premature ventricular contractions.
    Dang S; Jons C; Jacobsen PK; Pehrson S; Chen X
    J Arrhythm; 2019 Apr; 35(2):244-251. PubMed ID: 31007789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Magnetic versus manual catheter navigation for mapping and ablation of right ventricular outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias: a randomized controlled study.
    Zhang F; Yang B; Chen H; Ju W; Kojodjojo P; Cao K; Chen M
    Heart Rhythm; 2013 Aug; 10(8):1178-83. PubMed ID: 23692891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Comparison of Remote Magnetic Irrigated Tip Ablation versus Manual Catheter Irrigated Tip Catheter Ablation With and Without Force Sensing Feedback.
    Weiss JP; May HT; Bair TL; Crandall BG; Cutler MJ; Day JD; Osborn JS; Mallender C; Bunch TJ
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Mar; 27 Suppl 1():S5-S10. PubMed ID: 26969224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Safety and Clinical Outcome of Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias Using Contact Force Sensing: Consecutive Case Series.
    Hendriks AA; Akca F; Dabiri Abkenari L; Khan M; Bhagwandien R; Yap SC; Wijchers S; Szili-Torok T
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Nov; 26(11):1224-1229. PubMed ID: 26200478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Single-ring ablation compared with standard circumferential pulmonary vein isolation using remote magnetic catheter navigation.
    Sohns C; Bergau L; Seegers J; Lüthje L; Vollmann D; Zabel M
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2014 Oct; 41(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 24943245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Contact force sensing manual catheter versus remote magnetic navigation ablation of atrial fibrillation: a single-center comparison.
    Schlögl S; Schlögl KS; Bengel P; Haarmann H; Bergau L; Rasenack E; Hasenfuss G; Zabel M
    Heart Vessels; 2024 May; 39(5):427-437. PubMed ID: 38189924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.