157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34918578)
21. Single-pass 1-needle actuation versus single-pass 3-needle actuation technique for EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling: a randomized prospective trial (with video).
Ching-Companioni RA; Johal AS; Confer BD; Forster E; Khara HS; Diehl DL
Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 Sep; 94(3):551-558. PubMed ID: 33771557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Quality of Tissue Samples Obtained by Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsy: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial.
Lariño-Noia J; Fernández-Castroagudín J; de la Iglesia-García D; Lázare H; Nieto L; Porto S; Vallejo-Senra N; Molina E; San Bruno A; Martínez-Seara X; Iglesias-García J; García-Acuña S; Domínguez-Muñoz JE
Am J Gastroenterol; 2023 Oct; 118(10):1821-1828. PubMed ID: 37439519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. "Wet Heparin" and "Wet Saline" EUS-Guided Liver Biopsy Techniques Both Provide High Rates of Specimen Adequacy for Benign Parenchymal Liver Disease.
Saraireh H; Abdelfattah T; Hassouneh R; Lippman R; Puri P; Mutha P; Singh S; Fuchs M; Shah T
Dig Dis Sci; 2022 Nov; 67(11):5256-5261. PubMed ID: 35169957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy using a single-pass, slow-pull technique with a 19-G Franseen tip fine-needle biopsy needle: A prospective study.
Rai P; Majeed A; Kumar P; Rajput M; Goel A; Rao RN
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Jun; 42(3):418-424. PubMed ID: 37097513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. EUS-guided fine-needle liver biopsy in pediatric patients using a modified technique with one-pass, one-actuation wet suction.
Tejedor-Tejada J; Nieto J; Deshmukh A; Elmeligui AM
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2022 Oct; 114(10):575-579. PubMed ID: 35040332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsy.
Madhok IK; Parsa N; Nieto JM
Clin Liver Dis; 2022 Feb; 26(1):127-138. PubMed ID: 34802658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. EUS-guided liver biopsy for parenchymal disease: a comparison of diagnostic yield between two core biopsy needles.
Sey MS; Al-Haddad M; Imperiale TF; McGreevy K; Lin J; DeWitt JM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Feb; 83(2):347-52. PubMed ID: 26278654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Optimizing EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling: comprehensive assessment of needle types and tissue acquisition techniques.
Schulman AR; Thompson CC; Odze R; Chan WW; Ryou M
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Feb; 85(2):419-426. PubMed ID: 27530070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. In memoriam: Fine-needle aspiration, birth: Fine-needle biopsy: The changing trend in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition.
Bang JY; Kirtane S; Krall K; Navaneethan U; Hasan M; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
Dig Endosc; 2019 Mar; 31(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 30256458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparative Study of an Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Biopsy and Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration for Liver Tumors.
Takano Y; Noda J; Yamawaki M; Azami T; Kobayashi T; Niiya F; Maruoka N; Norose T; Ohike N; Wakabayashi T; Matsuo K; Tanaka K; Nagahama M
Intern Med; 2021; 60(11):1657-1664. PubMed ID: 34078770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling using a novel fork-tip needle: a case-control study.
Kandel P; Tranesh G; Nassar A; Bingham R; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Gomez V; Wallace MB
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec; 84(6):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 27018087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration versus standard fine-needle aspiration in pancreatic masses: a meta-analysis.
Facciorusso A; Mohan BP; Crinò SF; Ofosu A; Ramai D; Lisotti A; Chandan S; Fusaroli P
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Jul; 15(7):821-828. PubMed ID: 33481633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison between fine-needle biopsy and fine-needle aspiration for EUS-guided sampling of subepithelial lesions: a meta-analysis.
Facciorusso A; Sunny SP; Del Prete V; Antonino M; Muscatiello N
Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jan; 91(1):14-22.e2. PubMed ID: 31374187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) from peritoneal lesions: a prospective cohort pilot study.
Kongkam P; Orprayoon T; Yooprasert S; Sirisub N; Klaikaew N; Sanpawat A; Safa S; Ridtitid W; Kullavanijaya P; Rerknimitr R
BMC Gastroenterol; 2021 Oct; 21(1):400. PubMed ID: 34689752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration versus endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle biopsy in sampling pancreatic masses: A meta-analysis.
Wang J; Zhao S; Chen Y; Jia R; Zhang X
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Jul; 96(28):e7452. PubMed ID: 28700483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration for genomic profiling and DNA yield in pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
Kandel P; Nassar A; Gomez V; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Crook JE; Fares NS; Wallace MB
Endoscopy; 2021 Apr; 53(4):376-382. PubMed ID: 32767288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparative accuracy of needle sizes and designs for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.
Facciorusso A; Wani S; Triantafyllou K; Tziatzios G; Cannizzaro R; Muscatiello N; Singh S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Dec; 90(6):893-903.e7. PubMed ID: 31310744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration versus fine-needle biopsy and impact of rapid on-site evaluation for pancreatic masses.
de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Hathorn KE; Madruga-Neto AC; Lee LS; Thompson CC
Endosc Int Open; 2020 Jun; 8(6):E738-E747. PubMed ID: 32490158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling versus FNA in the diagnosis of subepithelial lesions: a large multicenter study.
de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Flumignan VK; Najdawai F; Ryou M; Lee LS; Thompson CC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jul; 92(1):108-119.e3. PubMed ID: 32105712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
