These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34920428)

  • 1. Radiographic and clinical outcomes in one- and two-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions: a comparison of bullet versus banana cages.
    Toop N; Viljoen S; Baum J; Hatef J; Maggio D; Oosten J; Deistler K; Gilkey T; Close L; Farhadi HF; Grossbach AJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2022 Jun; 36(6):918-927. PubMed ID: 34920428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Static Cage Morphology in Short-Segment Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusions Is Associated With Alterations in Foraminal Height But Not Clinical Outcomes.
    Toop N; Grossbach A; Gibbs D; Akhter A; Keister A; Maggio D; Oosten J; Deistler K; Gilkey T; Farhadi HF; Viljoen S
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Mar; 159():e389-e398. PubMed ID: 34954441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.
    Hawasli AH; Khalifeh JM; Chatrath A; Yarbrough CK; Ray WZ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E10. PubMed ID: 28760032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of steerable cage placement during minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion on lumbar lordosis.
    Lindley TE; Viljoen SV; Dahdaleh NS
    J Clin Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 21(3):441-4. PubMed ID: 24207010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Gödde S; Fritsch E; Dienst M; Kohn D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15):1693-9. PubMed ID: 12897494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable Cages: Increased Risk of Late Postoperative Subsidence Without a Real Improvement of Perioperative Outcomes: A Clinical Monocentric Study.
    Armocida D; Pesce A; Cimatti M; Proietti L; Santoro A; Frati A
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Dec; 156():e57-e63. PubMed ID: 34492389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of cage positioning on lumbar lordosis and disc space restoration following minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion.
    Issa TZ; Lee Y; Lambrechts MJ; Tran KS; Trenchfield D; Baker S; Fras S; Yalla GR; Kurd MF; Woods BI; Rihn JA; Canseco JA; Hilibrand AS; Vaccaro AR; Kepler CK; Schroeder GD
    Neurosurg Focus; 2023 Jan; 54(1):E7. PubMed ID: 36587401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.
    Massie LW; Zakaria HM; Schultz LR; Basheer A; Buraimoh MA; Chang V
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E8. PubMed ID: 29290133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term radiographic outcomes of expandable versus static cages in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Chang CC; Chou D; Pennicooke B; Rivera J; Tan LA; Berven S; Mummaneni PV
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Mar; 34(3):471-480. PubMed ID: 33186902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of interbody approach and lumbar level on segmental, adjacent, and sagittal alignment in degenerative lumbar pathology: a radiographic analysis six months following surgery.
    O'Connor B; Drolet CE; Leveque JA; Nemani V; Krause KL; Dorsi M; Schroerlucke S; Shen J; Louie PK
    Spine J; 2022 Aug; 22(8):1318-1324. PubMed ID: 35351666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing Outcomes of Banana-Shaped and Straight Cages in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Lin GX; He LR; Nan JN; Xu WB; Xiao K; Que Z; Jhang SW; Chen CM; Zhu MT; Rui G
    Neurospine; 2024 Mar; 21(1):261-272. PubMed ID: 38317558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Expandable cages that expand both height and lordosis provide improved immediate effect on sagittal alignment and short-term clinical outcomes following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF).
    Jitpakdee K; Sommer F; Gouveia E; Mykolajtchuk C; Boadi B; Berger J; Hussain I; Härtl R
    J Spine Surg; 2024 Mar; 10(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 38567017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using banana-shaped and straight cages: meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes.
    Sebaaly A; Kreichati G; Tarchichi J; Kharrat K; Daher M
    Eur Spine J; 2023 Sep; 32(9):3158-3166. PubMed ID: 37326836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Restoration of lumbopelvic sagittal alignment and its maintenance following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): comparison between straight type versus curvilinear type cage.
    Kim JT; Shin MH; Lee HJ; Choi DY
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Nov; 24(11):2588-96. PubMed ID: 25805578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with placement of steerable banana cage: A single-center retrospective analysis of radiographic parameters of success.
    Levy AS; Maddy K; Murray A; John DL; Kumar V; Urakov T
    Radiography (Lond); 2024 Jan; 30(1):163-167. PubMed ID: 38035428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable cages: Radiological and clinical results of banana-shaped and straight implants.
    Tassemeier T; Haversath M; Jäger M
    J Craniovertebr Junction Spine; 2018; 9(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 30443140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Expandable cages increase the risk of intraoperative subsidence but do not improve perioperative outcomes in single level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Stickley C; Philipp T; Wang E; Zhong J; Balouch E; O'Malley N; Leon C; Maglaras C; Manning J; Varlotta C; Buckland AJ
    Spine J; 2021 Jan; 21(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 32890783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation Between Cage Positioning and Lumbar Lordosis in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF).
    Vialle EN; Ramos GZ; Hinojosa FL; Guiroy A; Rocha LGDD; Arruda AO
    Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo); 2022 Oct; 57(5):821-827. PubMed ID: 36226212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing hyperlordotic and standard lordotic cages for achieving segmental lumbar lordosis during transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in adult spinal deformity surgery.
    Mathew J; Cerpa M; Lee NJ; Boddapati V; Marciano G; Sardar ZM; Lenke LG
    J Spine Surg; 2021 Sep; 7(3):318-325. PubMed ID: 34734136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictors of segmental lumbar lordosis following midline posterior (transforaminal) lumbar interbody fusion: Does interbody device type matter?
    Crawford CH; Epperson TN; Gum JL; Owens RK; Djurasovic M; Glassman SD; Carreon LY
    N Am Spine Soc J; 2022 Sep; 11():100145. PubMed ID: 35990008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.