316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34920886)
1. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab for treatment of US patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer.
Shi Y; Chen J; Shi B; Liu A
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 164(2):379-385. PubMed ID: 34920886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab monotherapy versus chemotherapy for previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Aziz MIA; Tan LE; Tan WHG; Toh CK; Loke LPY; Pearce F; Ng K
J Med Econ; 2020 Sep; 23(9):952-960. PubMed ID: 32462958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus standard-of-care chemotherapy for first-line treatment of PD-L1 positive (>50%) metastatic squamous and non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in France.
Chouaid C; Bensimon L; Clay E; Millier A; Levy-Bachelot L; Huang M; Levy P
Lung Cancer; 2019 Jan; 127():44-52. PubMed ID: 30642550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer in China.
Zheng Z; Song X; Qiu G; Xu S; Cai H
Curr Med Res Opin; 2023 Mar; 39(3):433-440. PubMed ID: 36757780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pembrolizumab with or without bevacizumab for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
Barrington DA; Riedinger C; Haight PJ; Tubbs C; Cohn DE
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Jun; 165(3):500-505. PubMed ID: 35422338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab for the first-line treatment of recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in the United States.
Borse RH; Ramakrishnan K; Gandhi J; Dhankhar P; Chirovsky D
J Med Econ; 2022; 25(1):954-965. PubMed ID: 35765888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative cost-effectiveness of first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy alone in persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer.
Lin YT; Wang C; He XY; Yao QM; Chen J
Front Immunol; 2023; 14():1345942. PubMed ID: 38274823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nivolumab vs Pembrolizumab for Treatment of US Patients With Platinum-Refractory Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Network Meta-analysis and Cost-effectiveness Analysis.
Pei R; Shi Y; Lv S; Dai T; Zhang F; Liu S; Wu B
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 May; 4(5):e218065. PubMed ID: 33956130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Combination Therapy for First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the United States.
Criss SD; Mooradian MJ; Watson TR; Gainor JF; Reynolds KL; Kong CY
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Sep; 2(9):e1911952. PubMed ID: 31553470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy With or Without Bevacizumab for Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer: Subgroup Analyses From the KEYNOTE-826 Randomized Clinical Trial.
Tewari KS; Colombo N; Monk BJ; Dubot C; Cáceres MV; Hasegawa K; Shapira-Frommer R; Salman P; Yañez E; Gümüs M; Olivera Hurtado de Mendoza M; Samouëlian V; Castonguay V; Arkhipov A; Tekin C; Li K; Toker S; Keefe SM; Lorusso D
JAMA Oncol; 2024 Feb; 10(2):185-192. PubMed ID: 38095881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy in the 1st line treatment of non-squamous NSCLC in the US.
Insinga RP; Vanness DJ; Feliciano JL; Vandormael K; Traore S; Burke T
J Med Econ; 2018 Dec; 21(12):1191-1205. PubMed ID: 30188231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness analysis of cemiplimab vs pembrolizumab for treatment of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.
Paul E; Konidaris G; Cope S; Chen CI; Keeping S; Xu Y; Atsou K; Ayers D; Guyot P; Sasane M; Mojebi A; Kuznik A
J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2021 Nov; 27(11):1513-1525. PubMed ID: 34351214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.
Liu Q; Tan C; Yi L; Wan X; Peng L; Li J; Luo X; Zeng X
PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0258605. PubMed ID: 34780478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-Effectiveness of Cemiplimab Versus Standard of Care in the United States for First-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression ≥50.
Kuznik A; Smare C; Chen CI; Venkatachalam M; Keeping S; Atsou K; Xu Y; Wilson F; Guyot P; Chan K; Glowienka E; Konidaris G
Value Health; 2022 Feb; 25(2):203-214. PubMed ID: 35094793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with PD-L1 tumor proportion score 1% or greater.
She L; Hu H; Liao M; Xia X; Shi Y; Yao L; Ding D; Zhu Y; Zeng S; Shen L; Huang J; Carbone DP
Lung Cancer; 2019 Dec; 138():88-94. PubMed ID: 31655368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Cancer Based on the KEYNOTE-181 Study.
Zhan M; Xu T; Zheng H; He Z
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():790225. PubMed ID: 35309225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost effectiveness of pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy as first-line treatment for metastatic NSCLC that expresses high levels of PD-L1 in Switzerland.
Bhadhuri A; Insinga R; Guggisberg P; Panje C; Schwenkglenks M
Swiss Med Wkly; 2019 Dec; 149():w20170. PubMed ID: 31880807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab as a Second-Line Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Chiang CL; Chan SK; Lee SF; Wong IO; Choi HC
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Jan; 4(1):e2033761. PubMed ID: 33464318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pembrolizumab and lenvatinib versus carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line therapy for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: A Markov analysis.
Ackroyd SA; Huang ES; Kurnit KC; Lee NK
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 162(2):249-255. PubMed ID: 34103196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The cost effectiveness of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy or atezolizumab as second-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma in the United States.
Slater RL; Lai Y; Zhong Y; Li H; Meng Y; Moreno BH; Godwin JL; Frenkl T; Sonpavde GP; Mamtani R
J Med Econ; 2020 Sep; 23(9):967-977. PubMed ID: 32412387
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
