256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34920924)
1. 2021 opinion from the CUROPF on THE efficacy and safety of mid-urethral slings used in women WITH urinary stress incontinence.
Cardot V; Campagne-Loiseau S; Roulette P; Peyrat L; Vidart A; Wagner L; Thuillier C; Klap J; Hurel S; Hermieu JF; Girard F; Even L; Donon L; Charles T; Tibi B; Bosset PO; Berrogain N; Meyer F; Cornu JN; Deffieux X
Prog Urol; 2022 Mar; 32(4):247-257. PubMed ID: 34920924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women.
Ford AA; Rogerson L; Cody JD; Aluko P; Ogah JA
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Jul; 7(7):CD006375. PubMed ID: 28756647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women.
Ford AA; Rogerson L; Cody JD; Ogah J
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Jul; (7):CD006375. PubMed ID: 26130017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surgical treatments for women with stress urinary incontinence: the ESTER systematic review and economic evaluation.
Brazzelli M; Javanbakht M; Imamura M; Hudson J; Moloney E; Becker F; Wallace S; Omar MI; Shimonovich M; MacLennan G; Ternent L; Vale L; Montgomery I; Mackie P; Saraswat L; Monga A; Craig D
Health Technol Assess; 2019 Mar; 23(14):1-306. PubMed ID: 30929658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retropubic or transobturator mid-urethral slings for intrinsic sphincter deficiency-related stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ford AA; Ogah JA
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jan; 27(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 26220506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retropubic versus Transobturator Mid Urethral Slings in Patients at High Risk for Recurrent Stress Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Kim A; Kim MS; Park YJ; Choi WS; Park HK; Paick SH; Kim HG
J Urol; 2019 Jul; 202(1):132-142. PubMed ID: 30865553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term efficacy and complications of a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing retropubic and transobturator mid-urethral slings: a prospective observational study.
Offiah I; Freeman R;
BJOG; 2021 Dec; 128(13):2191-2199. PubMed ID: 34478604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.
Nambiar A; Cody JD; Jeffery ST
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Jun; (6):CD008709. PubMed ID: 24880654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The fate of synthetic mid-urethral slings in 2013: A turning point.
Barboglio PG; Ann Gormley E
Arab J Urol; 2013 Jun; 11(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 26558068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgical interventions for women with stress urinary incontinence: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Imamura M; Hudson J; Wallace SA; MacLennan G; Shimonovich M; Omar MI; Javanbakht M; Moloney E; Becker F; Ternent L; Montgomery I; Mackie P; Saraswat L; Monga A; Vale L; Craig D; Brazzelli M
BMJ; 2019 Jun; 365():l1842. PubMed ID: 31167796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes and failure risks in mid-urethral sling insertion in elderly and old age with urodynamic stress incontinence.
Lo TS; Shailaja N; Tan YL; Wu MP; Chua S; Roy KW
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Apr; 31(4):717-726. PubMed ID: 31832716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Comparative Data on Colposuspensions, Pubovaginal Slings, and Midurethral Tapes in the Surgical Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Fusco F; Abdel-Fattah M; Chapple CR; Creta M; La Falce S; Waltregny D; Novara G
Eur Urol; 2017 Oct; 72(4):567-591. PubMed ID: 28479203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.
Lapitan MC; Cody JD
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 2():CD002912. PubMed ID: 26878400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term re-procedure rate after mid-urethral slings for stress urinary incontinence.
Tulokas S; Rahkola-Soisalo P; Gissler M; Mikkola TS; Mentula MJ
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Apr; 31(4):727-735. PubMed ID: 31956938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Midterm postoperative results of mid-urethral slings. Role of ultrasound in explaining surgical failures.
Escura S; Ros C; Anglès-Acedo S; Bataller E; Sánchez E; Carmona F; Espuña-Pons M
Neurourol Urodyn; 2022 Nov; 41(8):1834-1843. PubMed ID: 36057980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retropubic slings are more efficient than transobturator at 10-year follow-up: a Swedish register-based study.
Alexandridis V; Lundmark Drca A; Ek M; Westergren Söderberg M; Andrada Hamer M; Teleman P
Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jun; 34(6):1307-1315. PubMed ID: 36995417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How cure rates drive patients' preference for urethral bulking agent or mid-urethral sling surgery as therapy for stress urinary incontinence.
Casteleijn FM; Enklaar RA; El Bouyahyaoui I; Jeffery S; Zwolsman SE; Roovers JWR
Neurourol Urodyn; 2019 Jun; 38(5):1384-1391. PubMed ID: 30989703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized comparison of a single-incision needleless (Contasure-needleless®) mini-sling versus an inside-out transobturator (Contasure-KIM®) mid-urethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 24-month follow-up results.
Dogan O; Kaya AE; Pulatoglu C; Basbug A; Yassa M
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Sep; 29(9):1387-1395. PubMed ID: 29549394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retrospective study on the management and follow-up of 18 patients with a mid-urethral sling penetrating the urethra or bladder.
Goujon E; Jarniat A; Bardet F; Bergogne L; Delorme E
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2018 Sep; 47(7):289-297. PubMed ID: 29783036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgical management of urinary stress incontinence - Where are we now?
Dwyer PL; Karmakar D
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Jan; 54():31-40. PubMed ID: 30503362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
